Social psychologists have studied the psychological processes involved in persuasion, conformity, and other forms of social influence, but they have rarely modeled the ways influence processes play out when multiple sources and multiple targets of influence interact over time. However, workers in other fields from sociology and economics to cognitive science and physics have recognized the importance of social influence and have developed models of influence flow in populations and groups—generally without relying on detailed social psychological findings. This article reviews models of social influence from a number of fields, categorizing them using four conceptual dimensions to delineate the universe of possible models. The goal is to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations to build models that incorporate the detailed, microlevel understanding of influence processes derived from focused laboratory studies but contextualized in ways that recognize how multidirectional, dynamic influences are situated in people's social networks and relationships.
Abelson, R.P. (1964). Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. In N. Frederiksen & H. Gulliken (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model of local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution , 41, 203-226.
4.
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512.
5.
Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725-730.
6.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy , 100, 992-1026.
7.
Blanton, H., & Christie, C. (2003). Deviance regulation: A theory of identity and action. Review of GeneralPsychology, 7(2), 115-149.
8.
Brehm, J.W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, UK : Academic Press.
9.
Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 17, 475-482.
10.
Burt, R.S. (1978). Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups. Sociological Methods & Research , 7, 189-212.
11.
Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. New York: McGraw-Hill .
12.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
13.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized ? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690-755.
14.
Dittrich, P., Liljeros, F., Soulier, A., & Banzhaf, W. (2000). Spontaneous group formation in the seceder model . Physics Review Letters, 84, 3205-3208.
15.
Doreian, P. (2001). Causality in social network analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 30, 81-114.
16.
Fazio, R.H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford.
17.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Oxford, UK: Row & Peterson.
18.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Friedkin, N.E. (1994). Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods & Research , 12, 235-261.
20.
Friedkin, N.E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Gordijn, E.H., De Vries, N.K., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, attributions, and information processing . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1315-1326.
22.
Gottman, J.M. (1994). What predicts divorce?Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Gould, R.V. (1993). Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review, 58, 182-196.
24.
Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420-1443.
25.
Griffin, D.W., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 24, 319-359.
26.
Hastie, R., & Stasser, G. (2000). Computer simulation methods for social psychology . In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 85-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: Models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/5/3/2.html
28.
Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent information influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition . In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
30.
Jager, W., & Amblard, F. (2005). Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with and agent-based simulation model of attitude change. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory , 10, 295-303.
31.
Janssen, M.A., & Jager, W. (2001). Fashions, habits and changing preferences: Simulation of psychological factors affecting market dynamics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 745-772.
32.
Jin, M., Girvan, M., & Newman, M.E.J. (2001). The structure of growing social networks. Physics Review E, 64, 381-399.
33.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
34.
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R.C. (2001). Swarm intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffmann and Academic Press.
35.
Kleinberg, J.M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406, 24.
36.
Klovdahl, A.S. (1985). Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: The AIDS example. Social Science & Medicine, 21, 1203-1216.
37.
Klovdahl, A.S., Potterat, J.J., Woodhouse, D.E., Muth, J.B., Muth, S.Q., & Darrow, W.W. (1994). Social networks and infectious disease: The Colorado Springs study. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 79-89.
38.
Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L.W. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayer's attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly,30, 242-261.
39.
Kumkale, G.T., & Albarracín, D. (2004). The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 143-172.
40.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308
41.
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
42.
Latané, B., & Bourgeois, M.J. (1996). Experimental evidence for dynamic social impact: The emergence of subcultures in electronic groups. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 35-47.
43.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
Leavitt, H.J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 46, 38-50.
45.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 415-469). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Mackie, D.M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
48.
Macy, M.W., & Skvoretz, J. (1998). The evolution of trust and cooperation between managers. American Sociological Review, 63, 638-660.
49.
Macy, M.W., & Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143-166.
50.
Mason, W.A., Jones, A., & Goldstone, R.L. (2006). Propagation of innovations in networked groups. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University —Bloomington.
51.
McCann, C.D., Higgins, E.T., & Fondacaro, R.A. (1991). Primacy and recency in communication and self-persuasion: How successive audiences and multiple encodings influence subsequent evaluative judgments. Social Cognition , 9, 47-66.
52.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks . Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
53.
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1, 60-67.
54.
Miller, D.T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 298-305.
55.
Moldovan, S., & Goldenberg, J. (2004). Cellular automata modeling of resistance to innovations: Effects and solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 425-442.
56.
Monin, B., & Norton, M.I. (2003). Perceptions of a fluid consensus: Uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 29, 559-567.
57.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
58.
Moss, S., & Edmonds, B. (2005). Towards good social science. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/13.html
59.
Newman, M.E.J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 404-409.
60.
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
61.
Prislin, R., Limbert, W.M., & Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 385-397.
62.
Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B—Condensed Matter, 4, 131-134.
63.
Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
Rogers, R.W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection motivation theory. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behavior research I: Personal and social determinants (pp. 113-132). New York: Plenum.
65.
Rojas, F., & Howe, T. (2006). Contact patterns and aggregate opinion levels—Results from a simulation study. Unpublished manuscript.
66.
Rolfe, M. (2005). Social networks and simulations. In C. M. Macal, D. Sallach, & M. J. North (Eds.), Proceedings of the agent 2004 conference on Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity, and Emergence (pp. 483-499). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67.
Salganik, M.J., Dodds, P.S., & Watts, D.J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854-856.
68.
Schelling, T.C. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Review, 59, 488-493.
69.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. (1965). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Oxford, UK: Yale University Press.
70.
Smith, E.R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.
71.
Smith, E.R., & Conrey, F.R. (2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory-building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 11, 87-104.
72.
Smith, E.R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
73.
Smith, E.R., & Semin, G.R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 36, 53-117.
74.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537
75.
Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.
76.
Stasser, G. (1999). A primer of social decision scheme theory: Models of group influence, competitive model testing and prospective modeling. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 3-20.
77.
Stasser, G., Kerr, N.L., & Davis, J.H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 279-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
79.
Stauffer, D. (2001). Monte Carlo simulations of Sznajd models. Journal of Artificial and Simulated Societies, 5(1). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/1/4.html
80.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London : Academic Press.
81.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
82.
Turner, J.C., Wetherell, M.S., & Hogg, M.A. (1989). Referent informational influence and group polarization . British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 135-147.
83.
Urbig, D. (2003). Attitude dynamics with limited verbalisation capabilities . Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(1). Available at http://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2002-38-2.html
84.
Valente, T.W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations . Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
85.
Walker, A., & Wooldridge, M. (1995). Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 384-389). Menlo Park, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
86.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, W. (1953). A “sleeper” effect in opinion change . Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 48, 173-180.
89.
Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
90.
Wolfson, L.B. (2003). A study of the factors of psychological abuse and control in two relationships: Domestic violence and cultic systems. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2794.
91.
Wood, W.L.S., Ouellette, J.A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin , 115, 323-345.
