Reliability and Validity of Goniometric Turnout Measurements Compared with MRI and Retro-Reflective Markers

Abstract

There is no consensus on a valid and reliable method of measuring turnout. However, there is a building awareness that such measures need to exist. Total turnout is the sum of hip rotation, tibial torsion, and contributions from the foot. To our knowledge, there has been no research that directly measures and then sums each individual component of turnout to verify a total turnout value. Furthermore, the tibial torsion component has not previously been confirmed by an imaging study. The purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of a single total passive turnout (TPT) test taken with a goniometer by comparing it with the sum of the individual components. Fourteen female dancers were recruited as participants. Measurements of the subjects’ right and left legs were gathered for the components of turn-out. Tibial torsion was measured using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Retro-reflective marker assisted measurements were used to calculate the static components of TPT. Hip external rotation, TPT, and total active turnout (TAT) were measured by goniometer. Additional standing turnout values were collected on rotational disks. Tibial torsion and hip rotation were summed and compared with three whole-leg turnout values using Two-Tailed T-Tests and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients. Tibial torsion measurements in dancers were found to demonstrate substantial variation between subjects and between legs in the same subject. The range on the right leg was 16° to 60°, and the range on the left leg was 16° to 52°. Retro-reflective markers and biomechanical theory demonstrated that when the knee is extended and locked, “screwed home,” it will not factor into a whole-leg turnout value. TAT and turnout on the disks were not statistically significant when compared with the summed total. Statistical significance was achieved in four of the eight measurement series comparing TPT with the summed value of tibial torsion and hip rotation. The advantages of a standard, valid, and reliable method of measuring turnout are many, and the risks are few. Some advantages include improved training techniques, mastery of the use of turnout at an earlier age, better dancer and teacher compliance with suggested turnout rates, understanding the use of parallel position, understanding the etiology of many dance-related injuries, and possible development of preventative measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Grossman

. Measuring dancer's active and passive turnout. J Dance Med Sci. 2003;7(2):49–55.

Negus

. Associations between turnout and lower extremity injuries in classical ballet dancers. J Orthop Phys Ther. 2005 May;35(5):305–18.

Grossman

, Krasnow

, Welsh

. Effective use of turnout; bio-mechanical, neuromuscular, and behavioral considerations. J Dance Educ. 2005;5(1):15–27.

Welsh

, Rodriguez

, Iverson

, . Assessing turnout in university dancers. In: Solomon

, Solomon

(eds): Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science 2007. Canberra, Australia: IADMS, 2007, pp. 50–54.

Watkins

, Woodhul-Mcneal

, Clarkson

, Ebbeling

. Lower extremity alignment and injury in young, pre professional, college, and professional dancers. Med Probi Perform Art. 1989 Dec;(4)4:l48–58.

Gilbert

. Relationship between hip external rotation and turnout angle for the five classical ballet positions. J Sports Phys Ther. May 1998;27(5):339–47.

Hamilton

, Hamilton

, Marshall

, Molnar

. A profile of the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite professional ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med. 1992 May-June;20(3):267–73.

Tamari

, Tinley

, Briffa

, Breidahl

. Validity and reliability of existing and modified clinical methods of measuring femoral and tibiofibular torsion in healthy subjects: use of different axes may improve reliability. Clin Anat. 2005;(18)46–55.

Hudson

, Royer

, Richards

. Ultrasound measurements of torsions in the tibia and femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):138–43.

10.

Scheider

, Laubenberger

, Jemlich

, . Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1997 June; 70 (834): 575–9.

11.

Lang

, Volpe

. Measurement of tibial torsion. J Am Podiatr Assoc. 1998;88(4):161–5.

12.

Crookshanks

. Normative dance- specific musculoskeletal parameters for young female dancers in Australia. In: Solomon

, Solomon

(eds): Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science 2007. Canberra, Australia: IADMS, 2007, pp. 249–52.

13.

Magee

. The hip. In: Benson

(ed): Orthopedic Physical Assessment, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Com pany; 1987, pp. 239–265.

14.

Norkin

, White

. The hip. In: Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometery: Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1985, pp. 86–87.

15.

Johal

Williams

, Wragg

, . Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight-bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using ‘interventional MRI.’. J Biomech. 2005;38:269–76.

16.

Iwaki

, Pinskerova

, Freeman

. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1189–95.

17.

Dyrby

, Andriacchi

. Secondary motions of the knee during weight bearing and non-weight bearing activities. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:794–800.

18.

Freeman

, Pinskerova

. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech. 2005;38:197–208.

19.

Patel

, Hall

, Lotz

, . A three-dimensional MRI analysis of knee kinematics. J Orthp Res. 2004;22:283–92.

20.

Richardson

, Iglarsh

. The Foot and Ankle. In: Weinstien

, Rydivik

(eds): Clinical Orthopedic Physical Therapy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1994, pp. 501–513.

21.

Sahrmann

. Movement impairment syndromes of the hip. In: White

(ed): Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. St, Louis, MO: Mosby, 2002, pp. 121–190.

22.

Hoppenfeld

. Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976.

23.

Bauman

, Singson

, Hamilton

. Femoral neck anteversion in ballerinas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 May;302:57–63.

24.

Hamilton

, Aronsen

, Loken

, . Dance training intensity at 11-14 years is associated with femoral torsion in classical ballet dancers. Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40:299–303.

25.

Grossman

, Waninger

, Voloshin

, . Reliability and validity of goniometric turnout measurements compared with MRI and retro reflective markers. In: Solomon

, Solomon

(eds): Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science 2006. Eugene, OR: IADMS, 2006, pp. 9–12.

26.

Cibulka

, Sinacore DR , Cromer

, Delitto

. Unilateral hip rotation range of motion asymmetry in patients with sacroiliac joint regional pain. Spine. 1998;23(9):1009–15.

27.

Andrews

, Harrelson

, Wilk

. Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004.

28.

Gilbert

, Gross

, Klug

. Relationship between hip external rotation angle for the five classical ballet positions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 May;27(5):339–47.

29.

Clippinger-Robertson

. Biomechanical considerations in turnout. JOPERD. 1987 May/June; 58(5);37–40.

30.

Kahn

, Bennell

, Ng

, . Can 16-18-year-old elite ballet dancers improve their hip and ankle range of motion over a 12 month period of time. Clinical J Sports Med. 2000;10:98–103.

31.

Bennell

, Kahn

, Matthews

, Singleton

. Changes in hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in 8-11 year old novice female ballet dancers and controls: a 12 month follow up study. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35:54–9.

32.

Gupta

, Fernihough

, Bailey

, . An evaluation of differences in hip external rotation strength and range of motion between female dancers and non-dancers. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):778–83.

33.

Chunjuan

, Hongshun

, Ruo

, . An experimental study on the biomechanical properties of the cancellous bones of distal femur. Biomed Mater Eng. 2006;16(3):215–22.

34.

Bayraktar

, Morgan

, Niebur

, . Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech. 2004 Jan;37(1):27–35.

35.

Keaveny

, Guo

, Wachtel

, . Trabecular bone exhibits elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech. 1994 Sep:27(9): 1127–36.

36.

Hardaker

. Foot and ankle injuries in classical ballet dancers. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989 Oct;20(4):621–9.

37.

Brody

. Running injuries. Clin Symp. 1980;32(4):2–9.

38.

Marshall

. The rehabilitation of overuse foot injuries in athletes and dancers. Clin Sports Med. 1988 Jan;6(3):639–55.

39.

Gamboa

, Roberts

, Maring

, Ferus

. Injury patterns in elite adolescent preprofessional ballet dancers and the use of screening data to describe and predict injury characteristics. In: Solomon

, Solomon

(eds): Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science 2006. Eugene, OR: IADMS, 2006, pp. 47–51.

40.

Solomon

, Trepman

, Micheli

. Foot morphology and injury patterns in ballet and modern dancers. Kinesiol Med Dance. 1989;12(1):20–40.

41.

Grossman

. The dancers hip. In: Hughes

(ed): Independent Study Course 18.3, Dance Medicine: Strategies for the Prevention and Care of Injuries to Dancers. La Crosse, WI: Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc., 2008.