Monitoring Changes in Aerobic Fitness Using the Dance-Specific Aerobic Fitness Test (DAFT): A Longitudinal Study of Contemporary Dance and Dance Teacher Students
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Monitoring Changes in Aerobic Fitness Using the Dance-Specific Aerobic Fitness Test (DAFT): A Longitudinal Study of Contemporary Dance and Dance Teacher Students
Purpose: This longitudinal study aimed to monitor changes in heart rate (HR) variables during the dance-specific aerobic fitness test (DAFT) in contemporary dance and dance teacher students across their first, second, and third academic year. A secondary objective was to examine the influence of sex (female/male) and educational program (dance or dance teacher) on these changes. Methods: Between 2016 and 2024, a total of 408 students from a contemporary dance or dance teacher program completed the DAFT twice per year across their first, second, and third year of study. Peak heart rate (HRpeak) was determined at the end of the DAFT and heart rate recovery (HRR) was determined after 1 minute of rest. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to assess within-subject changes in HRpeak and HRR over time. Between-subjects main effects of sex and educational program were analyzed, along with interactions between time and these factors. Results: The repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time for HRpeak (P < .001, ŋp2 = 0.293). Pairwise comparisons showed that each subsequent measurement of HRpeak was significantly different from the first 2 measurements (September and February, year 1). HRpeak was significantly higher for females than for males at all 6 measurements (P = .003, ŋp2 = 0.234). A significant interaction effect between time and educational program (P = .023, ŋp2 = 0.085) was found. There was no significant effect of time for HRR (P = .159). Conclusion: HRpeak at the end of the DAFT test decreased over the course of 3 academic years. This decrease was more pronounced in dance students compared to dance teacher students, indicating that training intensity and curriculum structure influence aerobic adaptations. HRR remained stable over time, suggesting that additional targeted training may be needed to increase recovery capacity when required.
KoutedakisYJamurtasA.The dancer as a performing athlete: physiological considerations. Sports Med. 2004;34(10):651-661. doi:10.2165/00007256-200434100-00003
2.
WyonMAReddingE.Physiological monitoring of cardiorespiratory adaptations during rehearsal and performance of contemporary dance. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(3):611-614. doi:10.1519/14233.1
3.
CohenJLSegalKRWitriolI, et al. Cardiorespiratory responses to ballet exercise and the VO2max of elite ballet dancers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(3):212-217.
4.
WyonMAAbtGReddingE, et al. Oxygen uptake during modern dance class, rehearsal, and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):646-649. doi:10.1519/13082.1
5.
Rodrigues-KrauseJKrauseMReischak-OliveiraÁ.Cardiorespiratory considerations in dance: from classes to performances. J Dance Med Sci. 2015;19(3):91-102. doi:10.12678/1089-313x.19.3.91
6.
BronnerSRakovS.An accelerated step test to assess dancer pre-season aerobic fitness. J Dance Med Sci. 2014;18(1):12-21. doi:10.12678/1089-313x.18.1.12
7.
LégerLAMercierDGadouryC, et al. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6(2):93-101. doi:10.1080/02640418808729800
8.
CooperKH.A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. Correlation between field and treadmill testing. JAMA. 1968;203(3):201-204.
9.
LambertsRPSwartJNoakesTD, et al. A novel submaximal cycle test to monitor fatigue and predict cycling performance. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(10):797-804. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.061325
10.
OtterRTBrinkMSLambertsRP, et al. A new submaximal rowing test to predict 2,000-m rowing ergometer performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(9):2426-2433. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000000902
11.
MeeusenRDuclosMFosterC, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):186-205. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a
12.
ReddingEWellerPEhrenbergS, et al. The development of a high intensity dance performance fitness test. J Dance Med Sci. 2009;13(1):3-9.
13.
ReddingEWyonM.Strengths and weaknesses of current methods for evaluating the aerobic power of dancers. J Dance Med Sci. 2003;7(1):10-16. doi:10.1177/1089313x0300700102
14.
ReddingEWyonMShearmanJP, et al. Validity of using heart rate as a predictor of oxygen consumption in dance. J Dance Med Sci. 2004;8:69-72. doi:10.1177/1089313X0400800301
15.
WyonMReddingEAbtG, et al. Development, reliability, and validity of a multistage dance specific aerobic fitness test (DAFT). J Dance Me Sci. 2003;7(3):80-84.
16.
AngioiMMetsiosGTwitchettEA, et al. Effects of supplemental training on fitness and aesthetic competence parameters in contemporary dance: a randomised controlled trial. Med Probl Perform Art. 2012;27(1):3-8.
17.
BeckSWyonMAReddingE.Changes in energy demand of dance activity and cardiorespiratory fitness during 1 year of vocational contemporary dance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(3):841-848. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000002357
18.
van WindenDvan RijnRMSavelsberghGJP, et al. Characteristics and extent of mental health issues in contemporary dance students. Med Probl Perform Art. 2020;35(3):121-129. doi:10.21091/mppa.2020.3019
19.
van RijnRMStubbeJH.Generalized joint hypermobility and injuries: a prospective cohort study of 185 pre-professional contemporary dancers. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):1007. doi:10.3390/jcm10051007
20.
van SetersCvan RijnRMvan MiddelkoopM, et al. Risk factors for lower-extremity injuries among contemporary dance students. Clin J Sport Med. 2020;30(1):60-66. doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000000533
21.
van WindenDvan RijnRMSavelsberghGJP, et al. Limited coping skills, young age, and high BMI are risk factors for injuries in contemporary dance: a 1-year prospective study. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1452. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01452
22.
TiemensAvan RijnRMKoesBW, et al. Aerobic and anaerobic fitness levels of pre-professional contemporary dancers: an exploration of 2 dance-specific field tests. J Dance Med Sci. 2024;28(2):83-89. doi:10.1177/1089313x231213139
23.
BronnerSCodmanEHash-CampbellD, et al. Differences in preseason aerobic fitness screening in professional and pre-professional modern dancers. J Dance Med Sci. 2016;20(1):11-22. doi:10.12678/1089-313X.20.1.11
24.
WheatleyCMSnyderEMJohnsonBD, et al. Sex differences in cardiovascular function during submaximal exercise in humans. Springerplus. 2014;3:445. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-445
25.
SeoMWParkTYJungH.Sex differences in heart rate variability and vascular function following high-intensity interval training in young adults. J Hum Kinet. 2024;90:89-100. doi:10.5114/jhk/170964
26.
TiemensAPlaatsmanLAvan RijnRM, et al. Dance-specific aerobic fitness test (DAFT) heart rate variables are not associated with lower-extremity injuries in contemporary dance students. J Dance Med Sci. 2025;30(1):33-40. doi:10.1177/1089313x251320698
27.
MannTNWebsterCLambertsRP, et al. Effect of exercise intensity on post-exercise oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(9):1809-1820. doi:10.1007/s00421-014-2907-9
28.
LambertsRPSwartJNoakesTD, et al. Changes in heart rate recovery after high-intensity training in well-trained cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;105(5):705-713. doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0952-y
29.
DaanenHALambertsRPKallenVL, et al. A systematic review on heart-rate recovery to monitor changes in training status in athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(3):251-260. doi:10.1123/ijspp.7.3.251
30.
LambertsRPMaskellSBorresenJ, et al. Adapting workload improves the measurement of heart rate recovery. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(9):698-702. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1275357
