Despite health educators’ revitalized interest in community mobilization for health, little attention has been given to participants’ motives for mobilizing. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the understanding of community mobilizing by analyzing the motives for mobilization among a group of women community health workers (CHWs), members of a community-based organization in Mexico. The study is guided by critical feminist and social constructivist theories. It aims at identifying the categories of motives used by women CHWs and exploring how these motives are created while presenting women’s own voices. Women’s motives fall into four categories: getting out, serving, learning, and women’s betterment. These motives blend personal and public motives. The analysis suggests that mobilization for health may be enhanced by addressing both the personal satisfaction of individuals and the accomplishment of public goods. The study of motives may be useful for the recruitment and retention of participants in community mobilization efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Minkler M (ed.): Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1997.
2.
2. Community-Based Health Education for Urban Populations, Part II (Special issue). Health Education & Behavior25:1998.
3.
3. Collaborative Community Research: Partnerships Between Research and Practice (Special issue). Health Education & Behavior26:1999.
4.
4. Eng E, Young R: Lay health advisors as community change agents. Family Community Health15:24-40, 1992.
5.
5. Morgan LM: Community Participation in Health: The Politics of Primary Care in Costa Rica. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
6.
6. Klandermans B, Tarrow S: Mobilisation into social movements: Synthetisizing European and American approaches. International Social Movement Research1:1-38, 1988.
7.
7. Rothman J, Tropman JE: Three models of community organization and macro practice perspectives: Their mixing and phasing, in Cox FM, Erlich JL, Rothman J, Tropman J (eds.): Strategies of Community Organization: Macro Practice (4th ed.). Itasca, IL, F. E. Peacock, 1987, pp. 3-26.
8.
8. Fraser N: Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
9.
9. Abu-Lughod L: Writing Women’s Worlds: Bedouin Stories. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993.
10.
10. Smith DE: Institutional ethnography: A feminist method. Resources for Feminist Research15:6-13, 1986.
11.
11. Daykin N, Naidoo J: Feminist critiques of health promotion, in Bunton R, Nettleton S, Burrows R (eds.): The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analyses of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk. London, Routledge Kegan Paul, 1995, pp. 60-69.
12.
12. Knoke D, Woods JR: Organized for Action: Commitment in Voluntary Associations. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1981.
13.
13. Hodgkinson VA: Key factors influencing caring, involvement, and community, in Schervish P, Hodgkinson V, Gates M, Associates (eds.): Care and Community in Modern Society. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1995, pp. 21-50.
14.
14. Snyder M, Omoto AM: Who helps and why? The psychology of AIDS volunteerism, in Spacapan S, Oskamp S (eds.): Helping and Being Helped: Naturalistic Studies. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1992, pp. 213-239.
15.
15. Gabard DL: Volunteers in AIDS service organizations: Motivations and values. Health and Human Services Administration17:317-337, 1995.
16.
16. Ouellette SC, Cassel BJ, Maslanka H, Wong LM: GMHC volunteers and the challenges and hopes for the second decade of AIDS. AIDS Education and Prevention7(suppl.): 64-79, 1995.
17.
17. Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD: Volunteers motivations: A functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership2:333-350, 1992.
18.
18. Jenner RJ: Participation, leadership, and the role of volunteerism among selected women volunteers. Journal of Voluntary Action Research11:27-38, 1982.
19.
19. Omoto AM, Snyder M: Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. J Personality and Soc Psychology68:671-686, 1995.
20.
20. Knoke D, Wright-Isak C: Individual and organizational incentive systems. Research in the Sociology of Organizations1:209-254, 1982.
21.
21. Kaminer W: Women Volunteering: The Pleasure, Pain, and Politics of Unpaid Work from 1830 to the Present. Garden City, NY, Doubleday, 1984.
22.
22. Stephen L: Popular Feminism in Mexico. Z-magazine12:102-106, 1989.
23.
23. Safa H: Women’s social movements in Latin America. Gender & Society4:354-369, 1990.
24.
24. Chaney E: Supermadre: Women in Politics in Latin America. Austin, University of Texas, 1979.
25.
25. Massolo A: Por Amor y Coraje: Mujeres en Movimientos Urbanos de la Ciudad de Mexico [For love and courage: Women in Mexico City’s urban movements]. Mexico, El Colegio de Mexico, 1992.
26.
26. Martin J: Motherhood and power: The production of women’s culture of politics in a Mexican community. American Ethnologist17:470-490, 1990.
27.
27. Smith DH: Grassroots associations are important: Some theory and a review of the impact literature. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26:269-306, 1997.
28.
28. Naples N: Activist mothering: Cross-generational continuity in the community work of women from low income neighborhoods. Gender & Society6:441-463, 1992.
29.
29. Abrahams N: Negotiating power, identity, family, and community: Women’s community participation. Gender & Society10:768-796, 1996.
30.
30. Ramirez-Valles J: Changing women: The narrative construction of personal change through community health work among women in Mexico. Health Education & Behavior26:23-40, 1999.
31.
31. Holstein JA, Gubrium JF: Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretative practice, in Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 262-272.
32.
32. Gubrium JF, Holstein JA: Individual agency, the ordinary, and the postmodern life. Sociological Quarterly36:555-570, 1995.
33.
33. Scott J: Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review91:1067-1070, 1986.
34.
34. de Lauretis T: Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1987.
35.
35. Mills CW: Situated actions and vocabulary of motives. American Sociological Review5:904-913, 1940.
36.
36. Scott M, Lyman S: Accounts. American Sociological Review33:46-62, 1968.
37.
37. Snow D, Benford RD: Master frames and cycles of protest, in Morris AD, McClurg MC (eds.): Frontiers of Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1992, pp. 133-155.
38.
38. Goffman E: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, Harper Colophon, 1974.
39.
39. Benford RD: “You could be the hundredth monkey”: Collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. Sociological Quarterly34:195-216, 1993.
40.
40. Voysey M: A Constant Burden: The Reconstitution of Family Life. London, Routledge Kegan Paul, 1975.
41.
41. Craske N: Women’s political participation in colonias populares in Guadalajara, Mexico, in Radcliffe S, Westwood S (eds.): Viva: Women and Popular Protest in Latin America. London, Routledge Kegan Paul, 1993, pp. 112-135.
42.
42. Corcoran-Nantes Y: Female consciousness or feminist consciousness? Women’s consciousness raising in community-based struggles in Brazil, in Radcliffe S, Westwood S (eds.): Viva: Women and Popular Protest in Latin America. London, Routledge Kegan Paul, 1993, pp. 136-155.
43.
43. Carroll TF: Intermediary NGOs: The Supporting Link in Grassroots Development. West Hartford, CT, Kumarian, 1992.
44.
44. Pasara L, Delpino N, Valdeavellano R, Zarzar A (eds.): La Otra Cara de la Luna: Nuevos Actores Sociales en el Peru [The other face of the moon: New social actors in Peru]. Buenos Aires, Argentina, Manatial, 1991.
45.
45. Yudelman SW: Hopeful Openings: A Study of Five Women’s Development Organizations in Latin America and the Caribbean. West Hartford, CT, Kumarian, 1987.
46.
46. Mitchell C: Case and situation analysis. Soc Review51:187-211, 1983.
47.
47. Orum MA, Feagin JR, Sjoberg G: Introduction, in Feagin JR, Orum MA, Sjoberg G (eds.): A Case for the Case Study. Chapell Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1991, pp. 1-26.
48.
48. Stake RE: Case studies, in Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 236-247.
49.
49. Hamel J: Case Study Methods. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1993.
53. Riessman KC: Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1993.
54.
54. Rosenthal G: Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews, in Ruthellen J, Lieblich A (eds.): The Narrative Study of Lives. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1993, pp. 30-58.
55.
55. Silverman D: Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text, and Interaction. London, Sage, 1993.
56.
56. Adelman C: Introduction, in Adelam C (ed.): Uttering, Muttering: Collecting, Using and Reporting Talk for Social and Educational Research. London, Grant McIntyre, 1981, pp. 1-14.
58. Denzin N: Interpretative Biography. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1989.
59.
59. Ewick P, Selby S: Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law & Soc Review29:197-226, 1995.
60.
60. Orozco C: Beyond machismo, la familia, and ladies auxiliaries: A histography of Mexican-origin women’s participation in voluntary associations and politics in the United States, 1870-1990. Renato Rosaldo Lecture Series Monogr10:37-77, 1994.
