Technical Assistance for the Evaluation of Community-Based HIV Prevention Programs

Abstract

Funding agencies are using technical assistance (TA) to strengthen the evaluation capacity of community-based organizations (CBOs) engaged in HIV prevention efforts. The authors used qualitative methods to identify the types of evaluation TA needed by CBOs, to understand CBOs' past experiences with evaluation TA, and to elicit ideas for optimal delivery of evaluation TA. Assistance in developing evaluation tools and data analysis were the most commonly cited needs. Preferred TA providers were characterized as having practical expertise, accessibility, cultural competence, communication skills, and collaboration skills. Critical elements of an ideal TA system were adequate funding, program-specific TA, and extensive interaction between TA providers and CBO staff. Study data were used to generate a set of recommendations for health educators and others who may provide CBOs with TA for evaluating prevention programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for national human immunodeficiency virus case surveillance, including monitoring for human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep 48(RR-13):1-28, 1999.

2. Ruiz MS, Gable AR, Kaplan EH, Stoto MA, Fineberg H, Trussell J (eds.): No Time to Lose: Getting More From HIV Prevention. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2000.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Evaluating CDC-Funded Health Department HIV Prevention Programs: Vol. 1: Guidance. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999.

4. Rugg D, Buehler J, Renaud M, et al: Evaluating HIV prevention: A framework for national, state, and local levels. Am J Eval 20:35-56, 1999.

5. Davis D, Barrington T, Phoenix U, et al: Evaluation and technical assistance for successful HIV program delivery. AIDS Educ Prev 12(Suppl. A):115-125, 2000.

6. DiFranceisco W, Kelly JA, Otto-Salaj L, et al: Factors influencing attitudes within AIDS service organizations toward the use of research-based HIV prevention interventions. AIDS Educ Prev 11(1):72-86, 1999.

7. Valdiserri RO, West GR, Moore M, Darrow WW, Hinman AR: Structuring HIV prevention service delivery systems on the basis of social science theory. J Community Health 17(5):259-269, 1992.

8. Holman PB, Jenkins WC, Gayle JA, Duncan C, Lindsey BK: Increasing the involvement of national and regional racial and ethnic minority organizations in HIV information and education. Public Health Rep 106(6):687-694, 1991.

9, Chng CL, Sy FS, Choi ST, Bau I, Astudillo R: Asian and Pacific Islander American HIV community-based organizations: A nationwide survey. AIDS Educ Prev 10(3, Suppl.):48-60, 1998.

10.

10. Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994.

11.

11. Patton MQ: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.

12.

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: [Chart]. HIV/AIDS Surv Rep 8(2):8-9, 1996.