Does Graduated Licensing Empower Parents to Place Greater Restrictions on Their Newly Licensed Teens’ Driving?

Abstract

This investigation sought to determine if Maryland’s new graduated licensing programwas associated with greater levels of parental involvement in, and restriction on, teens’ unsupervised driving. Separate samples of teens with provisional licenses were interviewed by telephone before (n= 424) and after (n= 600) the new program took effect. The findings indicated that teens in the new program reported significant increases in the frequency of parental driving instruction and supervised driving during the permit phase. There were no differences in amounts of instruction or supervised driving after provisional licensure. Also, teens in the new program reported greater overall amounts of parental restriction on their driving; however, few specific restrictions showed increases. Programs that encourage parents to regulate, restrict, monitor, and supervise the driving privileges of their teens during their provisional period of licensure are recommended. Graduated licensing laws and programs benefit from specific behavioral interventions targeted to, and implemented by, parents.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Centers for Disease Control: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. WISQARS. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/default.htm. Accessed September 5, 2002.

2. Jonah BA: Accident risk and risk-taking behavior among young drivers. Accid Anal Prev 18: 255-271, 1986.

3. Ulmer RG, Williams AF, Preusser D: Crash involvement of 16-year old drivers. J Safety Res 28: 97-103, 1997.

4. Alexander EA, Kallail KJ, Burdsal JP, Ege DL: Multifactorial causes of adolescent driver accidents: Investigation of time as a major factor. J Adolesc Health Care 11: 413-417, 1990.

5. Jonah BA: Age differences in risky driving. Health Educ Res 5: 139-149, 1990.

6. Preusser DF: Delaying teenage licensure. Alcohol Drugs Driving 4: 283-295, 1988.

7. Vernick JS, Li G, Ogaitis S, MacKenzie EJ, Baker SP, Gielen AC: Effectsof high-school driver education on motor vehicle crashes, violations, and licensure. Am J Prev Med 16(1S): 40-46, 1999.

8. Williams AF: Graduated licensing comes to the United States. Inj Prev 5: 133-135, 1999.

9. McCartt AT: Graduated driver licensing systems: Reducing crashes among teenage drivers. JAMA 286(13): 1631-1632, 2001.

10.

10. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: U. S. licensing systems for young drivers. http://www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/state_laws/grad_license.htm. Accessed September 18, 2002.

11.

11. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: Teenagers: Graduated driver licensing. http://www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/qanda/gdl.htm. Accessed January 24, 2002.

12.

12. Ulmer RG, Preusser DF, Williams AF, Ferguson SA, Framer CM: Effect of Florida’s graduated licensing program on the crash rate of teenage drivers. Accid Anal Prev 32: 527-532, 2000.

13.

13. Foss RD, Feaganes JR, Rodgman EA: Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-yearold driver crashes in North Carolina. JAMA 286(13): 1588-1592, 2001.

14.

14. Shope JT, Molnar LJ, Elliot MR, Waller PF: Graduated driver licensing in Michigan: Early impact on motor vehice crashes among 16-year-old drivers. JAMA 286(13): 1593-1598, 2001.

15.

15. Doherty ST, Andrey JC, MacGregor C: The situational risks of young drivers: The influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates. Accid Anal Prev 30(1): 45-52, 1998.

16.

16. Preusser DF: Delaying teenage licensure. Alcohol Drugs Driving 4(3-4): 283-295, 1988.

17.

17. Williams AF, Preusser DF: Night driving restrictions for youthful drivers: A literature review and commentary. J Public Health Policy 18: 334-345, 1997.

18.

18. Ferguson SA, Leaf WA, Williams AF, Preusser DF: Differences in young driver crash involvement in states with varying licensure practices. Accid Anal Prev 28(2): 171-180, 1996.

19.

19. Preusser DF, Zador PL, Williams AF: The effect of city curfew ordinances on teenager motor vehicle fatalities. Accid Anal Prev 25(5): 641-645, 1993.

20.

20. Beck KH, Hartos J, Simons-Morton B: Teen driving risk: The promise of parental influence and public policy. Health Educ Behav 29(1): 71-82, 2002.

21.

21. Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Ferguson SA, Williams AF: Graduated licensing in Nova Scotia: A survey of teenagers and parents. J Traffic Med 26(1-2): 37-44, 1998.

22.

22. Williams AF, Ferguson SA, Leaf WA, Preusser DF: Views of parents of teenagers about graduated licensing systems. J Safety Res 29(1): 1-7, 1998.

23.

23. Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Ferguson SA, Williams AF: Graduated licensing in Ontario: Asurvey of parents. J Traffic Med 27(3-4): 71-80, 1999.

24.

24. Waller PF, Olk ML, Shope JT: Parental viewsof and experience with Michigan’sgraduated licensing program. J Safety Res 31(1): 9-15, 2000.

25.

25. The Rookie Driver: Maryland’s graduated licensing system. http://www.marylandmva.com/mvaprog/rookiedriver/law.htm. Accessed September 6, 2002.

26.

26. Beck KH, Shattuck T, Raleigh R: Parental predictorsof teen driving risk. Am J Health Behav 25(1): 10-20, 2001.

27.

27. Beck KH, Shattuck T, Raleigh R: A comparison of teen perceptions and parental reports of influence on driving risk. Am J Health Behav 25(4): 376-387, 2001.

28.

28. Hartos JL, Eitel P, Simons-Morton BG: Do parent-imposed delayed licensure and restricted driving reduce risky driving behaviors among newly-licensed teens?. Prev Sci 2(2): 111-120, 2001.

29.

29. Simons-Morton BG, Hartos JL, Leaf WA: Promoting parental management of teen driving. Inj Prev 8(suppl. 2): ii24-ii31, 2002.

30.

30. Hartos JL, Eitel P, Haynie DL, Simons-Morton BG: Can I take the car: Relations among parenting practices and adolescent problem-driving practices. J Adolesc Res 15(3): 352-367, 2000.

31.

31. Gielen AC, Girasek DC: Integrating perspectives on the prevention of unintentional injuries, in Schneiderman N, Speers MA, Silva JM, Tomes H, Gentry JH (eds.): Integrating Behavioral and Social Sciences With Public Health. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2001, pp. 203-227.

32.

32. Sleet DA, Gielen AC: Injury prevention, in Gorin SS, Arnold J (eds): Health Promotion Handbook. St. Louis, MO, C. V. Mosby, 1998, pp. 247-275.