News media are an important and influential part of the social environment, calling attention to certain issues by the amount and nature of their coverage. To better understand howhealth behaviors are covered, we examined more than 80, 000 stories in 1, 354 newspaper issues from four midsize Missouri communities. Health behavior stories were rare. Of 1, 373 stories (1. 7%) that addressed diet, physical activity, or tobacco, few were prominently located in the paper, and only half had a primary prevention focus. A large majority had no local angle, local quotes, or call to action for individuals or the community, and only 10% were generated by local reporters. Because the local newspaper can be especially influential in smaller communities, strategies are needed to help reporters and editors in these settings provide more and better coverage of health behavior-related stories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Wallack L, Dorfman L, Jernigan D, Themba M: Media Advocacy and Public Health: Power for Prevention. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1993.
2.
2. Centers for Media and Public Affairs: News of the Nineties. Media Monitor11(3): 1997. Retrieved from http://www.cmpa.com/mediamon.
3.
3. Freimuth V, Greenberg R, DeWitt J, Romano R: Covering cancer: Newspapers and the public interest. J Communic34(1): 62-73, 1984.
4.
4. Milio N: Health education = health instruction + health news: Media experiences in the United States, Finland, Australia, and England, in Rubinstein E, Brown J, (eds.): The Media, Social Science and Social Policy for Children. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985, pp. 118-136.
5.
5. Atkin C, Wallack L: Mass Communication and Public Health: Complexities and Conflicts. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
6.
6. Signorielli N: Mass Media Images and Impact on Health. Westport, CT, Greenwood, 1993.
7.
7. Gandy O: The economics of image building: The information subsidy in health, in McAnany E, Schnitman J, Janus N (eds.): Communication and Social Structure: Critical Studies in Mass Media Research. New York: Praeger, 1981, pp. 204-239.
8.
8. Albert E: Illness and deviance: The response of the press to AIDS, in Feldman D, Johnson T (eds.): The Social Dimensions of AIDS: Method and Theory. NewYork: Praeger, 1986, pp. 163-178.
9.
9. Baker A: The portrayal of AIDS in the media: An analysis of articles in the New York Times, in Feldman D, Johnson T (eds.): The Social Dimensions of AIDS: Method and Theory. NewYork:, Praeger, 1986, pp. 179-194.
10.
10. Fisher J, Gandy O, Janus N: The role of popular media in defining sickness and health, in McAnany E, Schnitman J, Janus N(eds.): Communication and Social Structure: Critical Studies in Mass Media Research. New York:, Praeger, 1981, pp. 240-257.
11.
11. Brown J, Walsh-Childers K: Effects of media on personal and public health, in Bryant J, Zillman D (eds.): Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994, pp. 505-505.
12.
12. McCombs M, Shaw D: The agenda setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Q36: 176-187, 1972.
13.
13. McCombs M, Shaw D: The evolution of agenda-setting research: 25 years in the marketplace of ideas. J Communic43(2): 58-68, 1993.
14.
14. Iyengar S, Peters M, Kinder D: Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. Am Political Sci Rev76(4): 848-858, 1982.
15.
15. Puska P, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J, Salonen J, Koskela K, McAlister A, Kottke TE, Maccoby N, Farquhar JW: The community-based strategy to prevent coronary heart disease: Conclusions from the ten years of the North Karelia project. Annu Rev Public Health6: 147-193, 1985.
16.
16. Fortmann S, Flora J, Winkleby M, Schooler C, Taylor C, Farquhar J: Community intervention trial: Reflections on the Stanford Five-City Project experience. Am J Epidemiol142(6): 576-586, 1995.
17.
17. Murray D: Design and analysis of community trials: Lessons learned from the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Epidemiol142(6): 569-575, 1995.
18.
18. The COMMIT research group: The community intervention trial of smoking cessation (COMMIT): Summary of design and intervention. J Natl Cancer Inst83: 1620-1628, 1991.
19.
19. Jernigan D, Wright P: Media advocacy: Lessons from community experiences. J Public Health Policy17(3): 306-330, 1996.
20.
20. Biglan A, Ary D, Smolkowski K, Duncan T, Black C: A randomised controlled trial of a community intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco use. Tob Control9(1): 24-32, 2000.
21.
21. Woodruff K: Alcohol advertising and violence against women: A media advocacy case study. Health Educ Q23(3): 330-345, 1996.
22.
22. Kinder D, Sears D: Public opinion and political action, in Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds.): Handbook of Social Psychology. (3rd ed.). NY, Random House, 1985, pp. 714-726.
23.
23. Kepplinger H, Roth H: Creating a crisis: German mass media and oil supply in 1973-74. Public Opinion Q33: 285-296, 1979.
24.
24. Lopez-Escobar E, Llamas J, McCombs M: Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. Intern J Public Opinion Res10(4): 335-348, 1998.
25.
25. Redman S, Spencer E, Sanson-Fisher R: The role of mass media in changing health-related behaviour: A critical appraisal of two models. Health Promotion Intern5(1): 85-101, 1990.
26.
26. Behr R, Iyengar S: Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Q49: 38-57, 1985.
27.
27. Fallows J: Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York, Pantheon Books, 1996.
28.
28. Rosen J: What Are Journalists for? New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2001.
29.
29. Eksterowicz A: The history and development of public journalism, in Eksterowicz A, Roberts R (eds.): Public Journalism and Political Knowledge. Lanham, MD:, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 3-20.
30.
30. Lambeth E, Meyer P, Thorson E (eds.): Assessing Public Journalism. Columbia, University of Missouri Press, 1998.
31.
31. Warhover T: Public journalism and the press: TheVirginian-pilot experience, in Eksterowicz A, Roberts R (eds.): Public Journalism and Political Knowledge. Lanham, MD:, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 43-60.
32.
32. Woo W: Public journalism: A critique, in Eksteroqicz A, Roberts R (eds.): Public Journalism and Political Knowledge. Lanham, MD:, Rowman & Littlef ield, 2000, pp. 21-42.
33.
33. McGinnis J: Prevention research and its interface with policy: Defining the terms and challenges. Prev Med23: 618-621, 1994.
34.
34. Center for Health Information Management and Epidemiology—Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services: Leading Causes of Death for Residents. Jefferson City, MO, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, 2001.
35.
35. Moen D: Newspaper Layout & Design: A Team Approach(4th ed.). Ames, IA, Iowa State University Press, 2000.
36.
36. The Missouri Group, Kennedy G, Moen D, Ranly D: News Reporting and Writing(6th ed.). New York, St. Martin’s, 1999.
37.
37. Petty R, Cacioppo J: Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA, William C. Brown, 1981.
38.
38. Brownson R, Remington P, Davis J (eds.): Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control. Washington, DC, American Public Health Association, 1993.
39.
39. Bartko J, Carpenter W: On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis163(5): 307-317, 1976.
40.
40. Gibbs S: Detecting and curing testicular cancer. Southeast Missourian(Cape Girardeau, MO), December 3, 1999, pp. 12-12.
41.
41. Gibbs S: Nobones about it. Southeast Missourian(Cape Girardeau, MO), March 5, 1999, p. 12-12.
42.
42. Webster K: “It’s Killing Us”—Study finds obesity shortens lives. Daily American Republic(Poplar Bluff, MO), October 7, 1999, p. 3-3.
43.
43. Bull F, Holt C, Kreuter M, Clark E, Scharff D: Understanding the effects of printed health education materials: Which features lead to which outcomes?. J Health Communic6(3): 265-279, 2001.
44.
44. Kreuter M, Oswald D, Bull F, Clark E: Are tailored health education materials always better than non-tailored materials?. Health Educ Res15(3): 305-316, 2000.
45.
45. Brug J, Steenhaus I, Van Assema P, De Vries H: The impact of computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med25: 236-242, 1996.
46.
46. Campbell M, DeVellis B, Strecher V, Ammerman A, DeVellis R, Sandler R: Improving dietary behavior: The effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health84(5): 783-787, 1994.
47.
47. Skinner C, Strecher V, Hospers H: Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference?. Am J Public Health84(1): 43-49, 1994.
48.
48. Becker M, Janz N: Practicing health promotion: The doctor’s dilemma. Ann Intern Med113(6): 416-421, 1990.
49.
49. Kreuter M, Bull F, Clark E, Oswald D: Understanding how people process health information: A comparison of tailored and untailored weight loss materials. Health Psychology18(5): 487-494, 1999.
50.
50. Brug J, Glanz K, Van Assema P, Kok G, Van Breukelen G: The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Educ Behav25(4): 517-531, 1998.
51.
51. Kreuter M, Strecher V: Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisals? Results from a randomized trial. Health Educ Res11(1): 97-105, 1996.
52.
52. Bull F, Kreuter M, Scharff D: Effects of tailored, personalized, and general materials on physical activity. Patient Educ Counsel36(2): 181-192, 1999.
53.
53. Logan R, Zengjun P, Wilson N: Science and medical coverage in the Los Angeles Timesand the Washington Post: A six year perspective. Sci Communic22(1): 5-26, 2000.
54.
54. Nunnally J, Bernstein I: Psychometric Theory(3rd ed.). New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.
56. Browne M, Cudeck R: Alternativeways of assessing model fit, in Bollen K, Long J (eds.): Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA:, Sage, 1993, pp. 136-162.
57.
57. Viswanath K, Finnegan J Jr, Rooney B, Potter J: Community ties in a rural Midwest community and use of newspapers and cable television. Journalism Q67(4): 899-911, 1990.
58.
58. Donohue G, Tichenor P, Olien C: Metro pullback and knowledge gaps within and between communities. Communic Res13: 453-471, 1986.
59.
59. Rothenbuhler E, Mullen L, DeLaurell R, Ryu CR: Communication, community attachment, and involvement. Journalism Mass Communic Q73(2): 445-466, 1996.
60.
60. U. S. Bureau of the Census: Demographic Profile 1. Summary File 1, 2000 Decennial Census. St. Louis City, MO, U. S. Bureau of the Census, 2000.
61.
61. Gale Directory of Publications and Broadcast Media. Detroit, MI, Gale Research, 1998.
62.
62. U. S. Bureau of the Census: Census of Population and Housing. Washington, DC, U. S. Bureau of the Census, 1990.
