This article describes the association of external and psychosocial factors on the stages of change for fruit and vegetable consumption, among 2,781 inhabitants, aged 18 to 65 years, in deprived neighborhoods (response rate 60%). To identify correlates of forward stage transition, an ordinal logistic regression model, the Threshold of Change Model (TCM), was used to analyze the data. The results indicate that men, those from Dutch origin, those with (rather) low health locus of control, those displaying risk behaviors, and those without knowledge of dietary guidelines were less likely to move from one stage to another and therefore were more likely to be in a lower stage-of-change category. The results make it possible to distinguish target groups, which should receive more attention in future health promotion campaigns, and to identify factors to be addressed in those programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Joshipura KJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, Colditz G, Ascherio A, Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willet WC: The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med134(12): 1106-1114, 2001.
2.
2. Ness AR, Powles JW: Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: A review. Int J Epidemiol26(1): 1-13, 1997.
3.
3. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD: Vegetables, fruits, and cancer prevention: A review. J Am Diet Assoc96: 1027-1039, 1996.
4.
4. Zieglar RG: Vegetables, fruits, and carotenoids and the risk of cancer. Am J Clin Nutr53(suppl.): 251S-259S, 1991.
5.
5. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans (5th ed., Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232). Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2000.
6.
6. Gerritsen WJ: Start of the fruit and vegetable mass media campaign. Towards 2 ounces of vegetables and 2 pieces of fruit per day [in Dutch]. Voeding56(9): 6-8, 1995.
7.
7. Thompson B, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor G, McClelland JW, Stables G, Havas S, Feng Z, Topor M, Heimendinger J, Reynolds KD, Cohen N: Baseline fruit and vegetable intake among adults in seven 5 a day study centers located in diverse geographic areas. J Am Diet Assoc99(10): 1241-1248, 1999.
8.
8. Hunt CJ, Nichols RN, Pryer JA: Who complied with national fruit and vegetable population goals? Findings from the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. Eur J Public Health10: 178-184, 2000.
9.
9. Netherlands Nutrition Centre: Zo eet Nederland 1998. Resultaten van de Voedselconsumptienpeiling 1998 [This is how the Dutch eat 1998. Results of the Dutch Nutrition Surveillance System 1998]. Den Haag, the Netherlands, VoVo, 1998.
10.
10. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G: Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory-and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ Behav25(5): 545-563, 1998.
11.
11. Armitage CJ, Conner M: Social cognition models and health behavior: A structured review. Psychol Health15: 173-189, 2000.
12.
12. Vries Hd, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P: Self-efficacy: The third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Res3: 273-282, 1988.
13.
13. Kok GJ, Vries Hd, Mudde AN, Strecher VJ: Planned health education and the role of self-efficacy: Dutch research. Health Educ Res6: 273-282, 1991.
14.
14. Azjen I, Fishbein M: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1980.
15.
15. Bandura A: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1986.
16.
16. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol47(9): 1102-1114, 1992.
17.
17. Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars AEJM, Groenhof F, Geurts JJM: Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in Western Europe. Lancet349(7): 1655-1659, 1997.
18.
18. Davey Smith G, Blane D, Bartley M: Explanations for socio-economic differentials in mortality. Eur J Public Health4: 132-144, 1994.
19.
19. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A: Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Lancet337(8754): 1387-1393, 1991.
20.
20. Droomers M, Schrijvers CTM, van de Mheen H, Mackenbach JP: Educational differences in leisure-time physical inactivity: A descriptive and explanatory study. Soc Sci Med47(11): 1665-1676, 1998.
21.
21. Van Duyn MA, Kristal AR, Dodd K, Campbell MK, Subar AF, Stables G, Nebeling L, Glanz K: Association of awareness, intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, and stage of dietary change with fruit and vegetable consumption: A national survey. Am J Health Promot16(2): 69-78, 2001.
22.
22. Brug J, Glanz K, Kok G: The relationship between self-efficacy, attitudes, intake compared to others, consumption, and stages of change related to fruit and vegetables. Am J Health Promot12(1): 25-30, 1997.
23.
23. Assema van P, Brug J, Ronda G, Steenhuis I, Oenema A: A short Dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: Relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health16(2): 85-106, 2002.
24.
24. Ruland R, Harting J, van Limpt P, Ronda G, van Assema P, van Ree J, Gorgels A, Vermeer F, Ament A: “Hartslag Limburg”: A United Approach. Maastricht, the Netherlands, GGD-ZZL, 1999.
25.
25. Lechner L, Brug J, de Vries H, van Assema P, Mudde A: Stages of change for fruit, vegetable and fat intake: Consequences of misconception. Health Educ Res13(1): 1-11, 1998.
26.
26. Ronda G, Van Assema P, Brug J: Stages of change, psychological factors and awareness of physical activity levels in the Netherlands. Health Promot Int16(4): 305-314, 2001.
27.
27. Mackenbach JP, Mheen van de H, Stronks K: A prospective cohort study investigating the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med38(2): 299-308, 1994.
28.
28. Hendriks AAJ, Ormel J, van de Willige G: Langdurige moeilijkheden gemeten volgens zelfbeoordelingsvragenlijst en semi-gestructureerd interview: Een theoretische en empirische vergelijking [Long-term difficulties measured by means of a self-assessment questionnaire and semistructured interview: A theoretical and empirical comparison]. Gedrag en Gezondheid337: 1387-1393, 1990.
29.
29. Permanent Research Living Conditions. Voorburg/Heerlen, Statistics Netherlands, 2002.
30.
30. Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ, Saris WHM, Kromhout D: Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol, in press.
31.
31. Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ, Weeks KA: The Thresholds of Change Model: An approach to analyzing stages of change data. Ann Behav Med21(1): 61-70, 1999.
32.
32. Peterson B, Harrell FE: Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Appl Statistics—J Royal Statistical Society Series C39(2): 205-217, 1990.
33.
33. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. New York, John Wiley, 1989.
34.
34. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG: Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System (2nd ed.). Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 2000.
35.
35. Social and Cultural Planning Office: “Living circumstances,” in Social and Cultural Surveys 1999 [in Dutch]. Den Haag, the Netherlands, Social and Cultural Planning Office, 1999, pp. 55-103.
36.
36. Te Riele S: Misrepresentation by Non-Response: How Accurate Are Outcomes of Household Surveys? [In Dutch]. Voorburg/Heerlen, Statistics Netherlands, 2002.
37.
37. Kristal AR, Glanz K, Curry SJ, Patterson RE: How can stages of change be best used in dietary interventions? J Am Diet Assoc99(6): 679-684, 1999.
38.
[published erratum appears in Health Educ Q22(2): 261, 1995]
39.
39. Campbell MK, Reynolds KD, Havas S, Curry S, Bishop D, Nicklas T, Palombo R, Buller D, Feldman R, Topor M, Johnson C, Beresford SA, Motsinger BM, Morrill C, Heimendinger J: Stages of change for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among adults and young adults participating in the national 5-a-Day for Better Health community studies. Health Educ Behav26(4): 513-534, 1999.
40.
40. Reed GR, Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Marcus BH: What makes a good staging algorithm?: Examples from regular exercise. Am J Health Promot12(1): 57-66, 1997.
41.
41. Brug J, Debie S, van Assema P, Weijts W: Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: Results of focus group interviews. Food Quality Preference6(2): 99-108, 1995.
42.
42. Hulshof KF, Lowik MR, Kok FJ, Wedel M, Brants HA, Hermus RJ, ten Hoor F: Diet and other life-style factors in high and low socio-economic groups (Dutch Nutrition Surveillance System). Eur J Clin Nutr45(9): 441-450, 1991.
43.
43. Lindström M, Hanson BS, Wirfält E, Östergren P: Socioeconomic differences in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and fruit juices. The influence of psychosocial factors. Eur J Public Health11: 51-59, 2001.
44.
44. Laforge RG, Greene GW, Prochaska JO: Psychosocial factors influencing low fruit and vegetable consumption. J Behav Med17(4): 361-374, 1994.
45.
45. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P, de Vries H: The impact of computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med25: 236-242, 1996.
46.
46. O’Loughlin J, Paradis G, Meshefedjian G: Evaluation of two strategies for heart health promotion by direct mail in a low-income urban community. Prev Med26(5 Pt. 1): 745-753, 1997.
