The aim of this study was to gain insight into the extent to which health education text writers apply writing principles derived from cognitive psychological theory. Seventeen professional text writers of health education materials participated in a qualitative study, consisting of a rewriting task combined with a think-aloud procedure and a semistructured interview. The verbal data were explored carefully in light of seven text coherence principles that have proven effective in cognitive psychological research to increase text comprehension. Findings indicate text writers vary in their ideas and use of coherence principles to make a text comprehensible. It is argued that the health education profession can benefit greatly from knowledge about cognitive text processing and cognitive coherence principles for realizing effective comprehension of written health education messages.
1. McGuire WJ: Attitude change: The information processing paradigm, in Clintock CG (ed.): Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
2.
2. Rogers RW: Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation, in Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (eds.): Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford, 1983, pp. 153-176.
3.
3. Flower LS, Hayes JR: The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints, in Gregg L, Steinberg E (eds.): Cognitive Processes in Writing. New York: Hillsdale, 1980, pp. 31-50.
4.
4. Hayes JR, Flower LS: On the structure of the writing process. Topics in Language Disorders7(4):19-30, 1987.
5.
5. Kintsch W: The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychol Rev95(2):163-182, 1988.
6.
6. Doak LG, Doak CC: Patient comprehension profiles: Recent findings and strategies. Patient Counseling and Health Education2(3):101-106, 1980.
7.
7. Davis TC, Michielutte R, Askov EN, Williams MV, Weiss BD: Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ Behav25(5):613-624, 1998.
8.
8. Doak LG, Doak CC, Meade CD: Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum23(8):1305-1312, 1996.
9.
9. Kintsch W: Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
10.
10. Clark HH, Haviland, Susan E: Comprehension and the given-new contract, in Freedle RO (ed.): Discourse Production and Comprehension. Norwood: Ablex, 1977, pp. 1-40.
11.
11. van Dijk TA, Kintsch W: Observations on the status of experimental research on discourse comprehension, in van Dijk TA, Kintsch W (eds.): Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 1983, pp. 21-60.
12.
12. Goldman SR: Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes23(3):357-398, 1997.
13.
13. Albrecht JE, O’ Brien EJ: Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn19(5):1061-1070, 1993.
14.
14. Lorch RF, Lorch EP, Matthews PD: On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language24(3):350-362, 1985.
15.
15. Lorch RF: Effects on recall of signals to text organization. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society23(5):374-376, 1985.
16.
16. Duffy SA: Role of expectations in sentence integration. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn12(2):208-219, 1986.
17.
17. McNamara DS, Kintsch E, Songer NB, Kintsch W: Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction14(1):1-43, 1996.
18.
18. Lorch RF: Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review1(3):209-234, 1989.
19.
19. Brooks LW, Dansereau DF, Spurlin JE, Holley CD: Effects of headings on text processing. Journal of Educational Psychology75(2):292-302, 1983.
20.
20. Wilhite SC: Reading for a multiple-choice test: Headings as schema activators. Journal of Reading Behavior20(3):215-228, 1988.
21.
21. Lorch RF Jr, Lorch EP: Effects of headings on text recall and summarization. Contemporary Educational Psychology21(3):261-278, 1996.
22.
22. Glover JA, Dinnel DL, Halpain DR, McKee TK: Effects of across-chapter signals on recall of text. J Exp Psychol80(1):3-15, 1988.
23.
23. Dixon FA, Glover JA: Another look at number signals and preview sentences. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society28(4):287-288, 1990.
24.
24. Lorch RF, Lorch EP. Topic structure representation and text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology77(2):137-148, 1985.
25.
25. Britton BK, Glynn SM, Meyer BJ, Penland MJ: Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. J Exp Psychol74(1):51-61, 1982.
26.
26. Britton BK, GülögCHAR2z S: Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology83(3):329-345, 1991.
27.
27. Kintsch W, van Dijk TA: Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychol Rev85(5):363-394, 1978,
28.
28. Sanders TJ, Spooren WP, Noordman LG: Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes15(1):1-35, 1992.
29.
29. Loman NL, Mayer RE: Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology75(3):402-412, 1983.
30.
30. Linderholm T, Everson MG, van den Broek P, Mischinski M, Crittenden A, Samuels J: Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction18(4):525-556, 2000.
32. Sanders TJM, Noordman LGM: The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes29(1):37-60, 2000.
33.
33. Ericsson KA, Simon HA: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.
34.
34. Buston K: NUD*IST in action: Its use and its usefulness in a study of chronic illness in young people. Sociological Research Online2(3):1-16, 1997.
35.
35. Vidal Abarca E: Important information in expository prose: The role of awareness of textual structure and of the skill in ranking ideas in a text, in van Hout-Wolters B, Schnotz W (eds.): Text Comprehension and Learning from Text. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger,1992, pp.35-52.
36.
36. Baddeley A: Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Bath, UK: Psychology Press, 1997.
37.
37. Sadoski M, Goetz ET, Fritz JB: Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology85(2):291-304, 1993.
38.
38. Trabasso T, Secco T, Broek PVD: Causal cohesion and story coherence, in Mandl H, Stein NL, Trabasso T, (eds.): Learning and Comprehension of Text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984, pp. 83-111.
