Community-university partnerships for research and action are at the heart of many fields in the social sciences including public health, urban planning, education, and community psychology. These partnerships involve individuals from different backgrounds and disciplines working together to address social issues of importance to the community. This article proposes an interactive and contextual model for developing and sustaining community-university partnerships. The phases in the model include gaining entry into the community, developing and sustaining a mutual collaboration (developing trust and mutual respect, establishing adequate communication, respecting human diversity, establishing a culture of learning, respecting the culture of the setting and the community, and developing an action agenda), and recognizing the benefits and outcomes of partnership work. The model also includes the potential challenges that might threaten the partnership, such as resource inequality and time commitment.
Amuwo, S. A., & Jenkins, A. (2001). True partnership evolves over time. In M. Sullivan & J. G. Kelly (Eds.), Collaborative research: University and community partnership(pp. 25-44). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
2.
Anderson, D. D. (2003). Students and service staff learning and researching together on a college campus. Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(2), 47-58.
3.
Balcazar, F., Keys, C., Kaplan, D.,& Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (1999). Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 105-112.
4.
Balcazar, F., Keys, C., & Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (2001). Empowering Latinos with disabilities to address issues of independent living and disability rights: A capacity building approach. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 21, 53-70.
5.
Bond, M. A.,& Keys, C. B. (1993). Empowerment, diversity and collaboration: Promoting synergy on community boards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 37-57.
6.
Evans, G. D., Rey, J., Hemphill, M. H.,& Perkins, D. (2001). Academic-community collaboration: An ecology for early childhood violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 22-30.
7.
Fawcett, S. B. (1990). Some emerging standards for community research and action: Aid from a behavioral perspective. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods(pp. 64-75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schultz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., et al. (1996). Empowering community-health initiatives through evaluation. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability(pp. 161-187). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
9.
Fawcett, S. B., White, G. W., Balcazar, F., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Mathews, M. R.,& Paine, A. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471-496.
10.
Foster-Fishman, P., Berkowitz, S., Lounsbury, D., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 241-261.
11.
Gibson, S., & Oberg, D. (1998). Learning to use the Internet: A study of teacher learning through collaborative research. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 44(2), 239-241.
12.
Gills, D. C., Butler, M., Rose, A.,& Bivens, S. (2001). Collaborative research and action in communities: Partnership building in the Chicago empowerment zone. In M. Sullivan & J. G. Kelly (Eds.), Collaborative research: University and community partnership(pp. 25-44). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
13.
Greenberg, J. S., Howard, D.,& Desmond, S. (2003). Acommunity-campus partnership for health: The Seat Pleasant-University of Maryland Health Partnership. Health Promotion Practice, 4, 393-401.
14.
Harper, G., Bangi, A. K., Contreras, R., Pedraza, A., Tolliver, M.,& Vess, L. (2004). Diverse phases of collaboration: Working together to improve community-based HIV interventions for youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 193-204.
15.
Harper, G. W., & Carver, L. J. (1999). Out-of-the-mainstream youth as partners in collaborative research: Exploring the benefits and challenges. Health Education and Behavior, 26(2), 250-265.
16.
Harper, G. W., Lardon, C., Rappaport, J., Bangi, A. K., Contreras, R., & Pedraza, A. (2004). Community narratives: The use of narrative ethnography in participatory community research. In L. Jason, C. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, M. Davis, J. Durlak, et al. (Eds), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action(pp. 199-217). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
Harper, G. W., & Salina, D. (2000). Building collaborative partnerships to improve communitybased HIV prevention research: The university-CBO collaborative (UCCP) model. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 19, 1-20.
18.
Jackson, R. S., & Reddick, B. (1999). The African American church and university partnerships: Establishing lasting collaborations. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 663-674.
19.
Jordan, L. C., Bogat, A. G., & Smith, G. (2001). Collaborating for social change: The Black psychologist and the Black community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 599-620.
20.
Kelly, J. G., Ryan, A. M., Altman, E., & Stelzner, S. P. (2000). Understanding and changing social systems: An ecological view. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology(pp. 133-159). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
21.
Lewis, M. R. (1998). The many faces of school social work practice: Results from a research partnership. Social Work in Education, 20(3), 177-190.
22.
Marin, G. (1993). Defining culturally appropriate community interventions: Hispanics as a case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 149-161.
23.
Mattessich, P., & Monsey, B. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. St. Paul, MN: Amherst Wilder Foundation.
24.
Minkler, M., Thompson, M., Bell, J.,& Rose, K. (2001). Contributions of community involvement to organizational-level empowerment: The federal Healthy Start experience. Health Education & Behavior, 28(6), 783-807.
25.
Nelson, G., Prilleltensky, I.,& MacGillivary, H. (2001). Building value-based partnerships: Toward solidarity with oppressed groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 649-677.
26.
Nyden, P., Figert, A., Shibley, M., & Burrows, D. (1997). Building community: Social science in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
27.
Ostrom, C. W., Lerner, R. M., & Freel, M. A. (1995). Building the capacity of youth and families through university-community collaborations: The Development-in-Context Evaluation (DICE) Model. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 427-448.
28.
Panet-Raymond, J. (1992). Partnership: Myth or reality?Community Development Journal, 27, 156-165.
29.
Park, P.,& Lee, W. L. (1999). Atheoretical framework for participatory evaluation research. Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology, 1(2), 89-100.
30.
Perkins, D. D.,& Wandersman, A. (1990). “You'll have to work to overcome our suspicions”: The benefits and pitfalls of research with community organizations. Social Policy, 20, 32-41.
31.
Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (2002). Doing psychology critically: Making a difference in diverse settings. Basingstroke, UK: Palgrave, Macmillan.
32.
Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research, and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart& Winston.
33.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121-148.
34.
Riger, S. (2001). Working together: Challenges in collaborative research. In M. Sullivan & J. G. Kelly (Eds.), Collaborative research: University and community partnership(pp. 25-44). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
35.
Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369-402.
36.
Sanstad, K. H., Stall, R., Goldstein, E., Everett, W.,& Brousseau, R. (1999). Collaborative community research consortium: A model for HIV prevention. Health Education & Behavior, 26(2), 171-184.
37.
Selener, D. (1997). Participatory action research and social change. Ithaca: The Cornell Participatory Action Research Network.
38.
Serrano-Garcia, I. (1990). Implementing research: Putting our values towork. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods(pp. 171-182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
Small, S. A. (1996). Collaborative, community-based research on adolescents: Using research for community change. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 9-22.
40.
Solarz, A. (2001). Investing in children, families, and communities: Challenges for an interdivisional public policy collaboration. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 1-14.
41.
Stadtlander, L. M. (2002). Integrating research, teaching and service through a graduate servicelearning course. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 67-69.
42.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Balcazar, F.,& Fawcett, S. B. (1992). Problem identification in applied social research. In F. Bryant, J. Edwards, R. S. Tindale, L. Health, E. L. Posavac, E. Henderson, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Social psychological methods applied to social issues(pp. 25-42). New York: Plenum.
43.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Davis, M., Ferrari, J., Nyden, P., Olson, B., Alvarez, J., Molloy, P., & Toro, P. (2004). University-community partnerships: Aframework and case study. In L. Jason, C. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, M. Davis, J. Durlak,& D. Isenberg (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theory and methods in action(pp. 105-120). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & Orellana-Damacela, L. (1999). A university-community partnership for empowerment evaluation in a community housing organization. Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology, 1(2), 115-132.
45.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Orellana-Damacela, L., Portillo, N., Sharma, A.,& Lanum, M. (2003). Implementing an outcomes model in the participatory evaluation of community initiatives. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 26(2), 5-25.
46.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Orellana-Damacela, L., Von Dreele, L., Leon, V., & Coleman, M. (2001). A community-university partnership for improving the quality of life of tenants of a housing organization. In M. Sullivan & M. Willis (Eds.), Collaborative research: University community partnerships(pp. 115-128). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
47.
Sullivan, M., & Kelly, J. G. (2001). Collaborative Research: University and community partnership. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
48.
Sullivan, M., Kone, A., Senturia, K. D., Chrisman, N. J., Ciske, S. J., & Krieger, J. W. (2001). Researchers and researched—Community perspectives: Toward bridging the gap. Health Education & Behavior, 28(2), 130-149.
49.
Taylor, R. R., Jason, L. A., Keys, C. B., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Davis, M. I., Durlak, J. A., et al. (2004). Capturing theory and methodology in participatory research. In L. A. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, M. I. Davis, J. A. Durlak, et al. (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action(pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Thompson, L. S., Story, M., & Butler, G. (2003). Use of a university-community collaboration model to frame issues and set an agenda for strengthening a community. Health Promotion Practice, 4(4), 385-392.
51.
Trickett, E. J., Watts, R. J.,& Birman, D. (Eds.). (1994). Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Weiss, E. S., Anderson, R. M.,& Lasker, R. D. (2002). Making the most of collaboration: Exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning. Health Education& Behavior, 29(6), 683-698.
53.
Wolff, T. (2001). A practitioner's guide to successful coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 173-191.
54.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology(pp. 43-63). New York: Plenum.
