Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has evolved as a popular new paradigm in health research. This shift is exciting, yet there is still much to discover about how various stakeholders are affected. This article uses a critical social science perspective to explore who benefits from these changes through an analysis of a CBPR case study (The Positive Youth Project). Two major categories of beneficiaries emerged: the research itself and the partner-stakeholders. The benefits, however, were not gained without substantial human resource investment, nor were they necessarily equitably spread. Participation costs included heavy demands of time, an added burden of work, frustration with the process, missing other opportunities, risking loss of anonymity, and loss of control. Care needs to be taken to ensure that concrete benefits accrue for all project partners and costs are minimized. Another way of framing benefits is to look at the community capacities built to address future health and social issues.
Blumenthal, D.S., & DiClemente, R.J. (2003). Community based health research. New York: Springer.
2.
Boutilier, M., Rajkumar, E., Poland, B.D., & Badgley, R. (2001). Community action success in public health: Are we using a ruler to measure a sphere?Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 90-94.
3.
Cain, R., & Todd, S. (2002). Shifting sands: The changing context of HIV/AIDS services in Ontario. Hamilton, ON: McMaster UniversitySchool of Social Work & The Ontario HIV Treatment Net work.
4.
Caldwell, C.H., Zimmerman, M.A., & Isichei, P.A.C. (2001). Forging collaborative partnerships to enhance family health: An assessment of strengths and challenges in conducting commu-nity-based research. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 7(2), 1-9.
5.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research?Social Science and Medicine, 41(12), 1667-1676.
7.
Cresswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Devers, K.J. (1999). How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research . Health Services Research, 34(5), 1153-1188.
9.
Eakin, J., Robertson, A., Poland, B., Coburn, D., & Edwards, R. (1996). Towards a criti al social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promotion Inter national , 11(2), 157-165.
10.
Eisinger, A., & Senturia, K. (2001). Doing community-driven research: A description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy ofMedicine, 78(3), 519-534.
11.
Fals-Borda, O., & Anishur-Rahman, M. (1991). Action and knowledge breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: The Apex Press.
12.
Flicker, S. (2004). “Ask me no secrets, I'll tell you no lies”: What happens when a respondent's story makes no sense. The Qualitative Report, 9(3), 528-537.
13.
Flicker, S., Goldberg, E., Read, S., Veinot, T., McClelland, A., Saulnier, P., et al. (2004). HIV-positive youth's perspectives on the Internet and eHealth. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 6(3), e32.
14.
Flicker, S., Skinner, H., Veinot, T., McClelland, A., Saulnier, P., Read, S.R., et al. (2005). Falling through the cracks of the big cities: Who is meeting the needs of young people with HIV?Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(4), 308-313.
15.
Freudenberg, N. (2001). Case history of the Cen ter for Urban Epidemiologic Studies in New York City. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 508-518.
16.
Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
17.
Gomez, C., & Goldstein, E. (1996). The HIV prevention evaluation initiative: A model for collaborative and empowerment evaluations. In D. Fetterman, S. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and account ability (pp. 100-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Green, L., George, M., Daniel, M., Frankish, C., Herbert, C., Bowie, W., et al. (1997). Back ground on participatory research. In D. Murphy, M. Scammell, & R. Sclove (Eds.), Doing community-based research: A reader (pp. 53-66). Amherst, MA: The Loka Institute.
19.
Green, L., & Mercer, S. (2001). Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1926-1929.
20.
Hall, B. (1993). Introduction. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. xiii-xxii). Toronto: OISE Press.
21.
Hawe, P. (1994). Capturing the meaning of “community” in community intervention evaluation: Some contributions from community psychology. Health Promotion International, 9(3), 199-210.
22.
Hawe, P., Noort, M., King, L., & Jordens, C. (1997). Multiplying health gains: The critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs. Health Policy, 39, 29-42.
23.
Israel, B., Eng, E., Schulz, A., & Parker, E. (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
24.
Israel, B., Schulz, A., Parker, E., & Becker, A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review ofPublic Health, 19(1), 173-194.
25.
Israel, B., Schulz, A., Parker, E., & Becker, A. (2001). Community-based participatory research: Policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Education forHealth, 14(2), 182-197.
26.
Jewkes, R., & Murcott, A. (1998). Community representatives: Representing the “community”?Social Science and Medicine, 46(7), 843-858.
27.
Keiffer, C. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A develop mental perspective . Prevention in Human Services, 3(2/3), 9-36.
28.
Kone, A., Sullivan, M., Senturia, K., Chrisman, J., Ciske, S., & Kreiger, J. (2000). Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2/3), 243-248.
29.
Lin coln, Y.S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A femi nist approach . Amherst: University of Massachusetts,Center for International Education .
31.
Maguire, P. (1993). Challenges, contradictions, and celebrations: Attempting participatory research as a doctoral student. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller , B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 157-176). Toronto: OISE Press.
32.
Mason, R., & Boutilier, M. (1996). The challenge of genuine power sharing in participatory research: The gap between theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 145-152.
33.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Minkler, M. (1978). Ethical issues in community organization. Health Education Monographs, 6(2), 198-210.
35.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
O'Fallen, L., & Dearry, A. (2002). Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. EnvironmentalHealth Perspectives, 110(2), 155-159.
37.
Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.
38.
Robert son, A., & Minkler, M. (1994). New health promotion movement: A critical examination. Health Education Quarterly, 21(3), 295-312.
39.
Sclove, R. (1997). Research by the people, for the people. Futures, 29(6), 541-549.
40.
Seifer, S. (2004, January 15). Promoting health through partnerships: Bridging the academic-community divide. Paper presented at the Wellesley Urban Health Seminar Series (slides), Toronto, Ontario.
41.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Stake, R.E. (2000). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Stoecker, R. (1999). Are academics irrelevant? Roles for scholars in participatory research. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(5), 840-854.
44.
Stoecker, R. (2005). Research methods for community change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Taylor, S.J., & Bogden, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guide book and resource (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
47.
Veinot, T., Flicker, S., Skinner, H., McClelland, A., Saulnier, P., Read, S., et al. (2006). “Supposed to make you better but it doesn't really”: HIV-positive youths' perceptions of HIV treatment. Journal of AdolescentHealth, 38, 261-267.
48.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K., Griffith, D., et al. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Summary, evidence report/ technology assessment, No. 99 (AHRQ Publication 04-E022-1). Rockville, MD: RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center & Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
49.
Vlahov, D., & Friedman, S.R. (2001). Urban research centers [Special feature]. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3).
50.
Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2003). The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community based participatory research and related participatory traditions. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 27-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
Wang, C., Yi, W., Tao, Z., & Carovano, K. (1998). Photovoice as a participatory health promotion strategy. Health Promotion International, 13, 75-86.
52.
Whyte, W.F., et al. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Williams, L., & Labonte, R. (2003). Changing health determinants through community action: Power, participation and policy. Promotion & Education, 10(2), 65-71.
54.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Zeldin, S., Larson, R., & Camino, L. (Eds.). (2005). Youth-adult relationships in community programs: Diverse perspectives on good practices [Special issue]. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1). Retrieved from http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/109798956
