Narrative is the basic mode of human interaction and a fundamental way of acquiring knowledge. In the rapidly growing field of health communication, narrative approaches are emerging as a promising set of tools for motivating and supporting health-behavior change. This article defines narrative communication and describes the rationale for using it in health-promotion programs, reviews theoretical explanations of narrative effects and research comparing narrative and nonnarrative approaches to persuasion, and makes recommendations for future research needs in narrative health communication.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Allen, M., & Preiss, R.W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports,14(2), 125-131.
3.
Alpert, M.I., & Anderson, W.T. (1973). Optimal heterophily and communication effectiveness: Some empirical findings. Journal of Communication, 23, 328-343.
4.
Andreoli, V., & Worchel, S. (1978). Effects of media, communicator, and message position on attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 59-79.
5.
Baesler, E.J., & Burgoon, J.K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21(5), 582-602.
6.
Bailey, E.J., Erwin, D.O., & Belin, P. (2000). Using cultural beliefs and patterns to improve mammography utilization among African American women: The Witness Project . Journal of the National Medical Association, 92(3), 136-142.
7.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychology Review, 84(2), 191-215.
8.
Bernhardt, J.M. (2004). Communication at the core of effective public health. American Journal of Public Health, 94(12), 2051-2052.
9.
Black, J.B., & Bower, G.H. (1979). Episodes as chunks in narrative memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 309-318.
10.
Booth-Butterfield, S., & Gutowski, C. (1993). Message modality and source credibility can interact to affect argument processing. Communication Quarterly, 41(1), 77-89.
11.
Booth-Butterfield, S., & Welbourne, J. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model: Its impact on persuasion theory and research. In J. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 155-173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Bouman, M., Maas, L., & Kok, G. (1998). Health education in television entertainment— Medisch Centrum West: A Dutch drama serial. Health Education Research, 13(4), 503-518.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
16.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A.H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241-256.
17.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
18.
Cole, H.P. (1997). Stories to live by: A narrative approach to health behavior research and injury prevention. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behavior research IV: Relevance for professionals and issues for the future (pp. 325-349). New York: Plenum.
19.
Dickson, P.R. (1982). The impact of enriching case and statistical information on consumer judgments. The Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 398-406.
20.
Erwin, D.O., Spatz, T.S., Stotts, R.C., & Hollenberg, J.A. (1999). Increasing mammography practice by African American women. Cancer Practice, 7(2), 78-85.
21.
Erwin, D.O., Spatz, T.S., Stotts, R.C., Hollenberg, J.A., & Deloney, L.A. (1996). Increasing mammography and breast self-examination in African American women using the Witness Project model. Journal of CancerEducation, 11(4), 210-215.
22.
Fishbein, M., Higgins, D.L., Rietmeijer, C., & Wolitski, R.J. (1999). Community-level HIV intervention in 5 cities: Final outcome data from the CDC AIDS community demonstration projects. American Journal of Public Health, 89(3), 336-346.
23.
Freimuth, V.S., & Quinn, S.C. (2004). The contributions of health communication to eliminating health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 94(12), 2053-2055.
24.
Gabbay, S.M., & Leenders, R.T.A.J. (2003). Creating trust through narrative strategy. Rationality and Society, 15(4), 509-539.
25.
Gates, H. (1989). Introduction: Narration and cultural memory in the African-American tradition. In L. Goss & M. Barnes (Eds.), Talk that talk: An anthology of African American storytelling. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26.
Glik, D., Berkanovic, E., Stone, K., Ibarra, L., Jones, M.C., Rosen, B., et al. (1998). Health education goesHollywood: Working with prime-time and daytime entertainment television for immunization promotion. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 263-282.
27.
Graber, D.A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication , 40(3), 134-155.
28.
Graesser, A.C., Golding, J.M., & Long, D.L. (1996). Narrative representation and comprehension. In R. K. Barr & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 171-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Graesser, A.C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229-262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review,101(3), 371-395.
31.
Green, M.C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes,38(4), 247-266.
32.
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 79(5), 701-721.
33.
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2002). In the mind's eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Green, M.C., Garst, J., & Brock, T.C. (2004). The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries . In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media (pp. 161-176). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Greene, K., & Brinn, L.S. (2003). Messages influencing college women's tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication , 8, 443-461.
36.
Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205-242.
37.
Howard, G.S. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy. American Psychologist , 46(3), 187-197.
38.
Janz, N.K., Zimmerman, M.A., Wren, P.A., Israel, B.A., Freudenberg, N., & Carter, R.J. (1996). Evaluation of 37 AIDS prevention projects: Successful approaches and barriers to program effectiveness. Health Education Quarterly, 23(1), 80-97.
39.
Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 261-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Koithan, M. (1994). The seeing self: Photography and storytelling as a health promotion methodology. NLN Publications,14-2611, 247-261.
41.
Kopfman, J.E., Smith, S.W., Ah Yun, J.K., & Hodges, A. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 279-300.
42.
Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 32-51). New York: Harper and Bros.
43.
Lutrell, W. (1989). Working class women's ways of knowing: Effects of gender, race, and class. Sociology of Education, 62, 33-46.
44.
Magliano, J.P., Zwaan, R.A., & Graesser, A. (1999). The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 219-245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Martin, R. (1995). Black family adaptation, survival, and growth strategies. In Oral history in social work (pp. 81-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Montgomery, K.C. (1993). The Harvard Alcohol Project: Promoting the designated driver on television. In T. E. Backer & E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 178-201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morrow, D.G., Greenspan, S.L., & Bower, G.H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 26, 165-187.
49.
Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Pennebaker, J.W. (2000). Telling stories: The health benefits of narrative . Literature and Medicine, 19(1), 3-18.
51.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion . In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
Pfau, M., Holbert, R.L., Zubric, S.J., Pasha, N.H., & Lin, W. (2000). Role and influence of communication modality in the process of resistance to persuasion. MediaPsychology , 2, 1-33.
53.
Polichak, J.W., & Gerrig, R.J. (2002). “Get up and win!” In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange , & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 71-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
55.
Prentice, D.A., Gerrig, R.J., & Bailis, D.S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 416-420.
56.
Rogers, E.M., & Bhowmik, D.K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(4), 523-538.
57.
Rogers, E.M., Vaughan, P.W., Swalehe, R.M.A., Rao, N., Svenkerud, P., & Sood, S. (1999). Effects of an entertainment-education radio soap opera on family planning behavior in Tanzania. Studies in Family Planning, 30(3), 193-211.
58.
Rosenthal, G. (2003). The healing effects of storytelling: On the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counseling. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(6), 915-933.
59.
Schank, R.C., & Berman, T.R. (2002). The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 287-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
Shankar, A., Elliott, R., & Goulding, C. (2001). Understanding consumption: Contributions from a narrative perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 429-453.
61.
Simons, H.W., Berkowitz, N.N., & Moyer, R.J. (1970). Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and theory. Psychological Bulletin,73(1), 1-16.
62.
Slater, M.D. (1999). Integrating application of media effects, persuasion, and behavior change theories to communication campaigns: A stages-of-changes framework. Health Communication, 11(4), 335-354.
63.
Slater, M.D. (2002a). Involvement as goal-directed strategic processing: Extending the elaboration likelihood model. In J. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 175-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Slater, M.D. (2002b). Entertainment-education and the persuasive impact of entertainment narratives. In M. C. Green , J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
Slater, M.D., Buller, D.B., Waters, E., Archibeque, M., & LeBlanc, M. (2003). A test of conversational and testimonial messages versus didactic presentations of nutrition informationJournal of Nutrition Education & Behavior,35(5), 255-259.
66.
Slater, M.D., & Rouner, D. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes . Communication Research, 23(2), 210-235.
67.
Slater, M.D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173-191.
68.
Smyth, J.M., Stone, A.A., Hurewitz, A., & Kaell, A. (1999). Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized trial. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 281(14), 1304-1309.
69.
Sparks, J., Areni, C., & Cox, K. (1998). An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion. Communication Monographs , 65, 108-125.
70.
Strange, J.J., & Leung, C.C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 436-449.
71.
Storey, D., Boulay, M., Karki, Y., Heckert, K., & Karmacharya, D.M. (1999). Impact of the integrated radio communication project in Nepal, 1994-1997. Journal of Health Communication, 4, 271-294.
Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M.D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. In J. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195-211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
Vaughan, P.W., & Rogers, E.M. (2000). A staged model of communication effects: Evidence from an entertainment-education radio soap opera in Tanzania. Journal of Health Communication, 5, 203-227.
75.
Weinstein, N. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7(4), 355-386.
76.
Weinstein, N., & Sandman, P. (1992). A model of the precaution adoption process: Evidence from home radon testing. Health Psychology, 11(3), 170-180.
77.
Wheeler, S.C., Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (1999). Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6(1), 136-141.
78.
Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. New York: Random House .
79.
Wilson, E.J., & Sherrell, D.L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101-112.
80.
Wilson, K.E., & Beck, V.H. (2002). Observations from the CDC: Entertainment outreach for women's health at CDC. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-BasedMedicine, 11(7), 575-578.
81.
Woodstock, L. (2002). Public journalism's talking cure. Journalism,3(1), 37-55.
82.
Worchel, S., Andreoli, V., & Eason, J. (1978). Is the medium the message? A study of the effects of media, communicator, and message characteristics on attitude change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5(2), 157-172.
83.
Zimbardo, P., & Leippe, M. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence . New York: McGraw-Hill.
