Research-based substance use prevention curricula typically yield small effects when implemented by school teachers under real-world conditions. Using a randomized controlled trial, the authors examined whether expert coaching improves the effectiveness of the All Stars prevention curriculum. Although a positive effect on students' cigarette use was noted, this finding may be attributed to marked baseline differences on this variable across the intervention and control groups. No effects were found on students' alcohol or marijuana use or on any of several variables thought to mediate curriculum effects. The effects of coaching on teachers may not become evident until future years, when they have moved beyond an initial mechanical delivery of the curriculum.
Abbott, R.D., O'Donnell, J., Hawkins, J.D., Hill, K.G., Kosterman, R., & Catalano, R.F. (1998). Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(4), 542-552.
2.
Allison, K.R., Silverman, G., & Dignam, C. (1990). Effects on students of teacher training in use of a drug education curriculum. Journal of Drug Education , 20(1), 31-46.
3.
Bierman, K., Coie, J., Dodge, K., Greenberg, M., Lochman, J., McMahon, R., et al. (2002). The implementation of the fast track program: An example of a large-scale prevention science efficacy trial. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(1), 1-17.
4.
Diez Roux, A. (2002). A glossary for multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(8), 588-594.
5.
Drug Strategies. (1999). Making the grade: A guide to school drug prevention programs. Washington, DC: Author .
6.
Edwards, J.L., & Newton, R.R. (1994). The effect of cognitive coaching on teacher efficacy and empowerment (Research Report No. 19941). Unpublished manuscript, Colorado Christian University, Lakewood .
7.
Fearnow-Kenney, M., Hansen, W.B., & McNeal, R. (2002). Comparison of psychosocial influences on substance use in adolescents: Implications for prevention programming . Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Use, 11(4), 1-24.
8.
Gingiss, P.L. (1992). Enhancing program implementation and maintenance through a multiphase approach to peer-based staff development. Journal of School Health, 62, 161-166.
9.
Gingiss, P.L. (1993). Peer coaching: Building collegial support for using innovative health programs. Journal of School Health , 63(2), 79-85.
10.
Hansen, W. (1992). School based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state-of-the-art in curriculum, 1980-1990. Health Education Research, 7, 403-430.
11.
Hansen, W. (1996). All Stars Sixth and Seventh Grade Curriculum, Version 1.32, United States Edition: Specialist Format. Greensboro, NC: Tanglewood Research.
12.
Hansen, W., & Dusenbury, L. (2004). All Stars Plus: A competence and motivation enhancement approach to prevention. Health Education, 104(6), 371-381.
13.
Harrington, N.G., Giles, S.M., Hoyle, R.H., Feeney, G.J., & Yungbluth, S.C. (2001). Evaluation of the All Stars Character Education and Problem Behavior Prevention Program: Effects on mediator and outcome variables for middle school students. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 533-546.
14.
Jones, E.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones , D. E. Kannouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett , S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
15.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1981). Transfer of training: The contribution of "coaching ." Journal of Education, 16(2), 163-172.
16.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
McCormick, K., & Brennan, S. (2001). Mentoring the new professional in interdisciplinary early childhood education: The Kentucky teacher internship program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(3), 131-149.
18.
McNeal, R.B.J., Hansen, W.B., Harrington, N.G., & Giles, S.M. (2004). How All Stars works: An examination of program effects on mediating variables. Health Education & Behavior , 31(2), 165-178.
19.
Mello, L.T. (1984). Peer-centered coaching. Teachers helping teachers to improve classroom performance. Indian Springs, CO: Associates for Human Development.
20.
National Implementation Research Network. ( 2004). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature . Retrieved August 11, 2005, from http://nirn.fmhi.usf.edu/resources/publications/Monograph
21.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2003). Preventing drug use among children: A research-based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
22.
Ralph, E. G. (2000). Aligning mentorship style with beginning teachers' development: Contextual supervision. Alberta Journal of Education Research, 46(4), 311-326. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Ringwalt, C.L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L.A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2002). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prevention Science, 3(4), 257-265.
24.
Robbins, P. (1995). Peer coaching: Quality through collaborative work . In J. Block, S. F. Everson, & T. R. Guskey (Eds.), School improvement programs: A handbook for educational leaders (pp. 54-58). New York: Scholastic.
25.
Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusions of innovations. New York: Free Press.
26.
Showers, B. (1984). Peer coaching: A strategy for facilitating transfer of training. A CEPM R&D report. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management.
27.
Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-17.
28.
Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77-87.
29.
Smart, D.A., Blase, K.B., Smart, D.I., Graham, K., Collins, S.R., Daly, P.B., et al. (1979). The teaching-family consultant's handbook (2nd ed.). Boys Town, NE: Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.
30.
Spouse, J. (2001). Bridging theory and practice in the supervisory relationship: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 512-522.
31.
St. Pierre, T.L., Osgood, D.W., Mincemoyer, C.C., Kaltreider, D.L., & Kauh, T.J. (2005). Results of an independent evaluation of Project ALERT delivered in schools by cooperative extension. Prevention Science, 6(4), 305-317.
32.
Taylor, S.E., & Koivumaki, J.H. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 403-408.
van Driel, J.H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
35.
Veenman, S., Gerrits, J., & Kenter, J. (1999). Coaching pre-service teachers. In Abstracts 8th European Conference on Learning and Instruction (p. 548). Goteborg, Sweden: European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.
36.
Walker, J., Koroloff, N., & Schutte, K. (2002). Implementing high-quality team-based individualized services planning: Necessary and sufficient conditions. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health.
