Is the Receptivity of Substance Abuse Prevention Programming Affected by Students' Perceptions of the Instructor?

Abstract

Drawing on the elaboration likelihood model of persuasive communication, the authors examine the impact of the perceptions of the instructor or source on students' receptivity to a new substance abuse prevention curriculum. Using survey data from a cohort of students participating in the Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study, the authors use structural equation modeling to determine the effects of the perceptions students have of their program instructor on measures of the targeted program mediators and the use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. They test these instructor effects after each component of a two-part curriculum is administered (during the seventh and ninth grades). They find that the perceptions of the instructor significantly affect refusal, communication and decision-making skills, normative beliefs, perceived consequences of use, and substance use. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for school-based prevention programming and indications for further research.

Keywords

substance abuse prevention instructor instructor evaluation normative beliefs instructor effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cegala, D.J. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30, 109-121.

Fishbein, M. , Ajzen, I. , & McArdle, J. (1980). Changing the behavior of alcoholics: Effects of persuasive communication. In I. Ajzen & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Effects of persuasive communication: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (pp. 217-242). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Fiske, S.T. , & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition. New York : McGraw-Hill.

Goldstein, A. , & McGinnis, E. (1997). Skillstreaming the adolescent: New strategies and perspectives for teaching prosocial skills. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

Gottfredson, D.C. , & Wilson, D.B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4(1), 27-38.

Hu, L. , & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

Johnston, L.D. , O'Malley, P.M. , & Bachman, J.G. (2001). The Monitoring the Future project (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services) . Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.

Muthén, L.K. , & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2004). Mplus users' guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

Petty, R.E. , & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York : Springer-Verlag.

10.

Petty, R.E. , Fleming, M.A. , & White, P.H. (1999). Stigmatized sources and persuasion: Prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 19-34.

11.

Petty, R.E. , & Wegener, D.T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current states and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford.

12.

Petty, R.E. , Wheeler, S.C. , & Tormala, Z.L. (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Vol. Eds.) & I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 353-382). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley.

13.

Roskos-Ewoldsen, D.R. , Bichsel, J. , & Hoffman, K. (2002). The influence of accessibility of source likeability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 137-143.

14.

Siegel, J.T. , & Burgoon, J.K. (2002). Expectancy theory approaches to prevention: Violating adolescent expectations to increase the effectiveness of public service announcements . In. W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 163-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Wilson, E.J. , & Sherrell, D.L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101-112.