Differences in Smokers and Nonsmokers’ Assessments of an Educational Campaign About Tobacco Use

Abstract

The authors surveyed 1,998 Missourians to evaluate (a) awareness and (b) understanding of messages about the impact of tobacco use in Missouri, (c) belief in the accuracy of the messages, and (d) intention to vote for a tobacco tax increase on the basis of the messages. Using structural equation modeling, the relationships among these four constructs were evaluated. A comparison of smokers and nonsmokers indicated that these two groups were influenced by the messages in different ways, χ²(8) = 20.89, p < .05, and should be modeled separately. The nonsmokers’ model demonstrated significant (p < .05) relationships between understanding the messages and belief in message accuracy (b = .41; R² = .17) and between belief in message accuracy and intention to vote in favor of the tobacco tax (b = .54; R² = .29). In the smokers’ model, understanding the messages was not a statistically significant predictor of belief in message accuracy. However, belief in message accuracy had a significant and positive relationship with intention to vote in favor of the tax (b = .45; R² = .21). These findings indicate that media campaigns about tobacco use should approach smokers and nonsmokers differently.

Keywords

tobacco policy health messages structural equation modelling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brodie

Hamel

Altman

D. G.

Blendon

Benson

(2003). Health news and the American public, 1996-2002. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28, 927-950.

Bryant

B. E.

(1975). Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 129-135.

Buhi

E. R.

Goodsom

Neilands

T. B.

(2008). Out of sight, not out of mind: Strategies for handling missing data. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32, 83-92.

Bull

F. C.

Holt

C. L.

Kreuter

M. W.

Clark

E. M.

Scharff

(2001). Understanding the effects of printed health education materials: Which features lead to which outcomes? Journal of Health Communication, 6, 265-297.

Cameron

Campo

(2006). Stepping back from social norms campaigns: Comparing normative influences to other predictors of health behaviors. Health Communication, 20, 277-288.

Campo

Cameron

(2006). Differential effects of exposure to social norms campaigns: A cause for concern. Health Communication, 19, 209-219.

Center for Advanced Social Research. (2006). Technical summary of St. Louis University Tobacco & Public Health Survey. Unpublished document.

Center for Tobacco Policy Research. (2007). MFH Tobacco Prevention and Cessation Initiative—Show Me Health: Clearing the air about tobacco—Evaluation findings. St. Louis, MO: Washington University in St. Louis.

Center for Tobacco Policy Research. (2008). Committee for a Healthy Future—Amendment 3: Tobacco Tax Campaign—Final evaluation report. St. Louis, MO: Washington University in St. Louis.

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs—August 1999. Atlanta, GA: Author.

11.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005a). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey data. Atlanta, GA: Author.

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005b). Prenatal smoking data book: State highlights. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/PrenatalSmkbk/states/missouri.htm

13.

Chapman

(1993). The role of advocacy in influencing government policy on tobacco. Lung Cancer, 9, 29-34.

14.

Clegg-Smith

Wakefield

Edsall

(2006). The good news about smoking: How do US newspapers cover tobacco issues? Journal of Public Health Policy, 27, 166-181.

15.

Farrell

A. D.

(1994). Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: Strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 477-487.

16.

Gentry

Herbers

Luke

D. A.

Mueller

N. B.

Kuhlenbeck

DeForest

(2007, November). Evaluation of a statewide educational campaign to build support for a tobacco tax increase in Missouri. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association annual meeting, Washington, DC.

17.

Harris

J. K.

Shelton

S. C.

Moreland-Russell

Luke

D. A.

(2010). Tobacco coverage in print media: The use of timing and themes by tobacco control supporters and opposition prior to a failed tobacco tax initiative. Tobacco Control, 19, 37-43.

18.

Holder

Treno

(1997). Media advocacy in community prevention: News as a means to advance policy change. Addiction, 92, SI89-SI99.

19.

Horner

M. J.

Ries

L. A. G.

Krapcho

Neyman

Aminou

Howlader

. . . Eisner

B. K.

(Eds.). (2009). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/

20.

Bentler

P. M.

(1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

21.

Jacobson

P. D.

Wasserman

Raube

(1993). The politics of anti-smoking legislation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 18, 787-819.

22.

Kennedy

J. M.

(1993, May). A comparison of telephone survey respondent selection procedures. Paper presented at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

23.

Klein

R. B.

(2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

24.

Kreuter

M. W.

McClure

S. M.

(2004). The role of culture in health communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 439-455.

25.

Lasswell

(1948). The structure and function of communication in society: Communication of ideas. New York, NY: Harper.

26.

Levy

D. T.

Hyland

Higbee

Remer

Compton

(2006). The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: Results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model. Health Policy, 82, 167-185.

27.

Liang

Chaloupka

Nichter

Clayton

(2003). Prices, policies and youth smoking. Addiction, 98(Suppl. 1), 105-122.

28.

McGuire

W. J.

(1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In Lindzey

Aronson

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd Ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.

29.

McGuire

W. J.

(1999). Constructing social psychology: Creative and critical processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

30.

McKee

S. A.

O’Malley

S. O.

Steward

W. T.

Neveu

Land

Salovey

(2004). How to word effective messages about smoking and oral health: Emphasize the benefits of quitting. Journal of Dental Education, 68, 569-573.

31.

McNeill

L. H.

Wyrwich

K. W.

Brownson

R. C.

Clark

E. M.

Kreuter

M. W.

(2006). Individual, social environment, and physical environmental influences on physical activity among black and white adults: A structural equation analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 36-44.

32.

National Institutes of Health. (1993). Major local tobacco control ordinances in the United States (3rd ed., NIH Publ. No. 93-3532). Bethesda, MD: Author.

33.

Nelson

D. E.

Holtzman

Bolen

Stanwyck

C. A.

Mack

K. A.

(2001). Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Social and Preventive Medicine, 46(Suppl. 1), S03-S42.

34.

Pinkleton

B. E.

Austin

E. W.

Cohen

Miller

Fitzgerald

(2007). A statewide evaluation of the effectiveness of media literacy training to prevent tobacco use among adolescents. Health Communication, 21, 23-34.

35.

Pornpitakpan

(2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243-281.

36.

Rothman

A. J.

Martina

S. C.

Bedell

B. T.

Detweiler

J. B.

Salovey

(1999). The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed message on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355-1369.

37.

Sato

(2003). Agenda setting for smoking control in Japan, 1945-1990: Influence of the mass media on national health policy making. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 23-40.

38.

Skala

Lin

Kliethermes

Zhu

B. P.

.; Office of Epidemiology, Division of Community and Public Health. (2005). The State of Missourians’ Health, 2005. Jefferson City: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.

39.

Small

Montgomery

T. P.

Harris

J. K.

Herbers

Luke

D. A.

Kuhlenback

(2007, October). Can you hear us now? Getting the message out about tobacco issues. Paper presented at the National Conference on Tobacco or Health, Minneapolis, MN.

40.

Stillman

F. A.

Hartman

A. M.

Graubard

B. I.

Gilpin

E. A.

Murray

D. M.

Gibson

J. T.

(2003). Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): A report of outcomes. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95, 1681-1691.

41.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

42.

Taurus

J. A.

(2004). Public policy and smoking cessation among young adults in the United States. Health Policy, 68, 321-332.

43.

Trodahl

V. C.

Carter

R. E.

(1964). Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 71-76.

44.

Williams-Piehota

Pizarro

Navarro-Silvera

S. A.

Mowad

Salovey

(2006). Need for cognition and message complexity in motivating fruit and vegetable intake among callers to the Cancer Information Service. Health Communication, 19, 75-84.