A substance abuse prevention and life skills program for economically disadvantaged, high sensation seeking African American teens was developed and tested in Cincinnati, Ohio. Formative research was conducted to determine program content and format. Over two implementations, 289 individuals in the target population were recruited as participants for the field test of the program. For the first implementation, participants were randomly selected from the city's summer youth employment program. For the second, a media campaign was designed to recruit participants. Process evaluation indicated that participants evaluated the program extremely positively. Outcome evaluation indicated that significant pretest differences between high and low sensation seekers were neutralized for liquor and marijuana in both years of the program and for attitude toward drugs in the first year of the program. These results suggest that sensation seeking is a useful message design and audience-targeting variable for substance abuse prevention program design. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Donohew L: Effects of Drug Abuse Message Styles (Final report; Grant No. DA03462). Rockville, MD, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988.
2.
2. Donohew L, Lorch EP, Palmgreen P: Sensation seeking and targeting of televised anti-drug PSAs, in Donohew L, Sypher HE, Bukoski WJ (eds.): Persuasive Communication and Drug Abuse Prevention. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.
3.
3. Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Lorch EP, Rogus M, Helm D, Grant NE: Sensation seeking, message sensation value, and drug use as mediators of PSA effectiveness. Health Comm3:217-227, 1991.
4.
4. Lorch EP, Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Helm D, Baer SA, Dsilva MU: Program context, sensation seeking, and attention to televised anti-drug public service announcements. Human Communication Research20:390-412, 1994.
5.
5. Donohew L, Palmgreen P, Lorch EP: Attention, need for sensation, and health communication campaigns. Am Behav Sci38:310-332, 1994.
6.
6. Palmgreen P, Lorch EP, Donohew L, Harrington NG, Dsilva M, Helm D: Reaching at-risk populations in a mass media drug abuse prevention campaign: Sensation seeking as a targeting variable. Drugs Soc8:29-45, 1995.
7.
7. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG: National Survey Results on Drug Use From the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1994 (NIH Publication No. 95-4026). Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1995.
8.
8. Clayton RR, The Ann Arbor Group: Increase in Use of Selected Drugs: Monitoring the Future Study of 8th- 10th- and 12th-graders. Report of the Ann Arbor Group, Ann Arbor, MI, 1994.
9.
9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population Estimates 1994 (DHHS Publication No. SMA 95-3063). Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1995.
10.
10. Tobler N: Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs. J Drug Issues16:537-567, 1986.
11.
11. Tobler N: Drug prevention can work: Research findings. J Addict Dis11(3):1-28, 1992.
12.
12. Catalano RF, Hawkins JD, Krentz C, Gillmore D, Wells E, Abbot R: Using research to guide culturally-appropriate drug abuse prevention. J Consulting Clin Psychol61:804-811, 1993.
13.
13. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP): Substance Abuse Prevention Demonstration Grants for High Risk Populations: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (No. 93.144:A-3). Rockville, MD, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, February 1995.
14.
14. Zuckerman M: Sensation-Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
15.
15. Zuckerman M: A biological theory of sensation seeking, in Zuckerman M (ed.): Biological Bases of Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity, and Anxiety. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.
16.
16. Zuckerman M: Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
17.
17. Andrucci GL, Archer RP, Pancoast DL, Gordon RA: The relationship of MMPI and sensation seeking scales to drug use. J Personality Assessment53:253-266, 1989.
18.
18. Bates ME, Labouvie EW, White HR: The effect of sensation seeking needs on alcohol and marijuana use in adolescence. Bull Soc Psychol Addict Behav5:29-36, 1986.
19.
19. Newcomb MD, McGee L: Adolescent alcohol use and other delinquent behaviors: A one-year longitudinal study controlling for sensation seeking. Criminal Justice Behav16:345-369, 1989.
20.
20. Teichman M, Barnea Z, Rahav G: Sensation seeking, state and trait anxiety, and depressive mood in adolescent substance users. Int J Addict24(2):87-99, 1989.
21.
21. Murphy DL, Belmaker RH, Buchsbaum MS, Martin NF, Ciaranello R, Wyatt RJ: Biogenic amine related enzymes and personality variations in normals. Psychol Med7:149-157, 1977.
22.
22. Benjamin J, Li L, Patterson C, Greenberg BD, Murphy DL, Hamer DH: Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics12:81-84, 1996.
23.
23. Cloninger CR, Adolfsson R, Svrakic NM: Mapping genes for human personality. Nature Genetics12:3-4, 1996.
24.
24. Ebstein R, Novick O, Umansky R, Priel B, Osher Y, Blaine D, Bennett ER, Nemanov L, Katz M, Belmaker RH: Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics12:78-80, 1996.
25.
25. Fulker DW, Eysenck SG, Zuckerman M: A genetic and environmental analysis of sensation seeking. J Research Personality14:261-281, 1980.
26.
26. Segal B, Huba GJ, Singer JL: Drugs, Daydreaming, and Personality: A Study of College Youth. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.
27.
27. Carrol EN, Zuckerman M, Vogel WH: The test of the optimal level of arousal theory of sensation seeking. J Personality Soc Psychol42:572-575, 1982.
28.
28. Donohew L, Helm D, Lawrence P, Shatzer M: Sensation seeking, marijuana use, and responses to prevention messages: Implications for public health campaigns, in Watson R (ed.): Prevention and Treatment of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. Clifton, NJ, Humana, 1990.
29.
29. Teichman M, Rahav G, Barnea Z: A comprehensive substance prevention program: An Israeli experiment. J Alcohol Drug Educ33(3):1-10, 1988.
30.
30. Forsyth G, Hundleby JD: Personality and situation as determinants of desire to drink in young adults. Int J Addictions22:653-669, 1987.
31.
31. Dsilva MU: Dissemination and Targeting of Anti-Drug PSAs: An Interplay of Individual Differences and Program Context in Televised Drug Abuse Prevention Program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Communication, University of Kentucky, 1993.
32.
32. Schierman MJ, Rowland GL: Sensation seeking and selection of entertainment. Personality Individual Differences5:599-603, 1985.
33.
33. Motivational Educational Entertainment (MEE): Reaching the Hip-Hop Generation. Philadelphia, MEE Productions, Inc., 1992.
35. Ellickson P, Bell R: Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science247:1299-1305, 1990.
36.
36. Hansen WB: Effective school-based approaches to drug abuse prevention. Educ Leader34(6):9-14, 1988.
37.
37. Hansen WB: School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990. Health Educ Research7:403-430, 1992.
38.
38. Silverman M: Prevention research: Impediments, barriers, and inadequacies, in Rey KH, Faegre CL, Lowery P (eds.): Prevention Research Findings: 1988. Washington, DC, Office for Substance Abuse Prevention, 1988.
39.
39. Goddard LL (ed.): An African-Centered Model of Prevention for African-American Youth at High Risk. Proceedings from a conference convened by staff of the Office for Substance Abuse Prevention, Washington, DC, 1993.
40.
40. Freeman EM: The use of storytelling techniques with young African-American males: Implications for substance abuse prevention. J Intergroup Relations19(3):53-72, 1992.
