This study investigated associations between confidence in one's ability to discuss mammography with health providers and to obtain regular mammograms (self-efficacy), social network members' attitudes toward mammograms (social influence), mammography experiences, and intention to have a mammogram in the next 1 to 2 years among women who were not in adherence with screening guidelines. Data were collected as part of a baseline assessment for a work site intervention study. Women 52 years and older completed a selfadministered survey. Those not in compliance with screening guidelines (n = 194) were included in the analyses. Logistic regression revealed that self-efficacy and strong supportive social influences were significantly associated with mammography intention (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50, OR = 2.22, respectively), adjusting for prior mammography use. Findings suggest that interventions designed to promote mammography should build women's confidence in their ability to discuss mammography with health providers and to obtain regular mammograms. Intervention among social networks may also be an effective means of promoting mammography.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures-1997. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 1997.
2.
2. Kelsey JL, Horn-Ross PL: Breast cancer: Magnitude of the problem and descriptive epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev15:7-16, 1993.
3.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: The National Strategic Planfor the Early Detection and Control of Breast and Cervical Cancers. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1994.
5. National Cancer Institute: NCI adopts new mammography screening guidelines for women. J Natl Cancer Inst89:538-540, 1997.
6.
6. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 Interventions. Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
7.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People 2000: Midcourse Review and 1995 Revisions. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1995.
8.
8. Anderson LM, May DS: Has the use of cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States?Am JPublic Health85:840-842, 1995.
9.
9. Rimer BK: Understanding the acceptance of mammography by women. Ann Behav Med14:197-203, 1992.
10.
10. Rimer BK, Kasper Keintz M, Kessler HR, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR: Why women resist mammography: Patient-related barriers. Radiology172:243-246, 1989.
11.
11. Urban N, Anderson GL, Peacock S: Mammography screening: How important is cost as a barrier to use?Am JPublic Health84:50-55, 1994.
12.
12. Rimer BK: Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med16:317-326, 1994.
13.
13. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstron PF: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med19:279-290, 1990.
14.
14. Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA: Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Rep108:605-624, 1993.
15.
15. Horton JA, Romans MC, Cruess DF: Mammography attitudes and usage study. Women r Health Iss2(4):180-186, 1992.
16.
16. Breen N, Kessler L: Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Survey. Am JPublic Health84:62-67, 1994.
17.
17. Centers for Disease Control: Use of mammography-United States. MMWR39(36):621-630, 1990.
18.
18. Ackermann SP, Brackbill RM, Bewerse BA, Cheal NC, Sanderson LM: Cancer screening behaviors among U.S. women: Breast cancer, 1987-1989, and cervical cancer, 1988-1989. MMWR41:17-34, 1992.
19.
19. Calle EE, Flanders D, Thun MJ,Martin LM: Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in U.S. women. Am JPublic Health83:53-60, 1993.
20.
20. Gritz ER, Bastani R: Cancer prevention-behavior changes: The short and long of it. Prev Med22:676-688, 1993.
21.
21. Gritz ER, DiMatteo MR, Hays RD: Methodological issues in adherence to cancer control regimens. Prev Med18:711-720, 1989.
22.
22. Janz NK, Becker MH: The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q11: 1-47, 1984.
23.
23. Azjen I, Fishbein M: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1980.
24.
24. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother: Theor, Res Prac20:161-173, 1982.
25.
25. Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA: Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Rep108:605-624, 1993.
26.
26. Allen JD, Sorensen GC, Stoddard AS, Colditz G, Peterson K:The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. In review.
27.
27. National Cancer Institute Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity. JAMA264:54-58, 1990.
28.
28. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1986.
29.
29. Strecher VJ, McEvoy DeVellis B, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM: The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q13:73-91, 1986.
30.
30. Rakowski W, Fulton JP,Feldman JP: Women's decision making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol12:209-214, 1993.
31.
31. Champion VL: The relationship of selected variables to breast cancer detection behaviors in women 35 and older. Oncol Nurs Forum18:733-739, 1991.
32.
32. Champion V: Relationship of age to mammography compliance. Cancer74:329-335, 1994.
33.
33. Champion VL: Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening. Cancer Detect Prev16:253-258, 1992.
34.
34. Montano DE, Taplin SH: A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation. Soc Sci Med32:733-741, 1991.
35.
35. King E, Rimer BK, Balshem A, Ross E, Seay J: Mammography-related beliefs among older women. JAging and Health5:82-100, 1993.
36.
36. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL: Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors. Am JPublic Health79:1499-1502, 1989.
37.
37. Burack RC, Liang J: The acceptance and completion of mammography by older Black women. Am JPublic Health79:721-726, 1989.
38.
38. Mayer JA, Kossman MK, Miller LC, Crooks CE, Slymen DJ, Lee CD: Evaluation of a media-based mammography program. Am JPrev Med8:23-29, 1992.
39.
39. Mayer JA, Slymen DJ: Predicting Compliance With Screening Mammography. Paper presented at the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 11th Annual Meeting Scientific Sessions, Chicago, Spring, 1990.
40.
40. Calnan M. Patterns in preventive behavior: A study of women in middle age. Soc Sci Med20:263-268, 1985.
41.
41. Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G: Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London. JEpidemiol Community Health48:65-73, 1994.
42.
42. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau ofthe Census: 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Summary of Social, Economic and Housing Characteristics. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, 1990.
43.
43. Alagna S, Morokoff P, Bevett J: Performance of breast self-examination by women at high risk for breast cancer. Womens Health12:29-46, 1987.
44.
44. Maibach E, Murphy DA: Self-efficacy in health promotion research and practice: Conceptualization and practice. Health Educ Res: Theor Prac10:37-50, 1995.
45.
45. Gonzalez JT: Factors relating to frequency of breast self-examination among low-income Mexican American women. Cancer Nurs13:134-142, 1990.
46.
46. Baumann LJ, Brown RL, Fontana SA, Cameron L: Testing a model of mammography intention. JAppl Soc Psychol23:1733-1756, 1993.
47.
47. Eng E, Smith J: Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education. Breast Cancer Res Treat35:23-29, 1995.
48.
48. Eng E, Young R: Lay health advisors as community change agents. JFam Community Health15(l):24-40, 1992.
49.
49. Suarez L, Nichols DC, Brady CA: Use of peer role models to increase Pap smear and mammography screening in Mexican-American and Black women. Am JPrev Med9:290-296, 1993.
