This study investigates taxpayer behavior in response to the phaseout of exemptions. This provision implicitly creates fifty $2,500 intervals based on the adjusted gross income (AGI) of high-income taxpayers. Certain individuals can save taxes by adjusting AGI to fall near the top of the previous interval. Thus, the distribution of their reported AGI is hypothesized to be disproportionately greater near the top of these intervals. This study uses tax return data with univariate tests to detect this “bunching effect” and logit models to profile taxpayer attributes that are associated with this behavior. Revenue and efficiency estimates are also addressed. Understanding responses to phaseouts is important as the tax system uses such to unobtrusively raise revenues and target incentives. This bunching effect was observed for the third and fourth years following enactment.However, no bunching was observed for the first two years or for the fifth year following enactment.
Alm, James, and Sally Wallace. 2000. Are the rich different? In Does Atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich, edited by Joel Slemrod. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
2.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Individual Taxation Committee. 1997. Working group phase-out simplification proposal. Washington, DC: AICPA.
3.
Burman, Leonard, and William G. Gale. 2001. A golden opportunity to simplify the tax system. Policy Brief No. 77, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.
4.
Burman, Leonard, William G. Gale, and David Weiner. 1998. Six tax laws later: How individuals'marginal federal income tax rates changed between 1980 and 1985. National Tax Journal51 (3): 637-652.
5.
Christian, Charles W., and Sanjay Gupta. 1993. New evidence on secondary evasion. Journal of the American Taxation Association15 (1): 72-93.
6.
Clotfelter, Charles. 1983. Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. Review of Economics and Statistics65 (3): 363-373.
7.
Copp, Cindy, and Gary McGill. 1992. Visibility and perceptions of fairness: A “now you see it, now you don't” tax policy for the 1990s?Tax Notes54 (8): 1013-16.
8.
de Bartolome, Charles A. M.1995. Which tax rate do people use: Average or marginal?Journal of Public Economics56 (1): 79-96.
9.
Enis, Charles. 1991. The use of individual tax model files to obtain data for empirical research in taxation. In A guide to tax research methodologies, edited by Charles R. Enis, 81-95. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
10.
Enis, Charles, and Leroy Christ. 1999. Implications of phase-outs on individual marginal tax rates. Journal of the American Taxation Association21 (1): 45-72.
11.
Friedberg, Leora. 1998. The Social Security earnings test and the labor supply of older men. In Tax policy and the economy, edited by James Poterba. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Gale, William G.2001. Tax simplification: Issues and options. Tax Notes92 (11): 1463-83.
13.
Goolsbee, Austan. 2000. It's not about the money: Why natural experiments don't work on the rich. In Does Atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich, edited by Joel Slemrod. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
Harmelink, Philip, and Phyllis Copeland. 1993. Hidden taxes through phaseouts and floors: Assessment and policy implications. Tax Notes58 (1): 77-85.
15.
Internal Revenue Service. 1989-1995. General description booklets for (1989-1995) individual tax model files, statistics of income public use tax files. Washington, DC: Individual Statistics Branch, Statistics of Income Division, Internal Revenue Service.
16.
Internal Revenue Service. 1995. Statistics of income bulletin. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Johnson, Linda L., and James A. Fellows. 1992. A reconsideration of effective marginal tax rates after recent tax reform. Taxes70 (4): 260-270.
18.
Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). 1993. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. Report of the Committee on the Budget to accompany H.R. 2264. May 25.
19.
Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). 1998. Present law and analysis relating to individual effective marginal tax rates(JCS-3-98). February 3. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
20.
Kahnemann, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica47 (2): 263-291.
21.
Lerman, Allen, and Jim Cilke. 1991. The distribution of effective marginal tax rates. In Proceedings of the Eighty-Fourth Annual Conference on Taxation, National Tax Association Tax Institute of America, 245-256. Columbus, OH: NTA-TIA.
22.
Liebman, Jeffrey. 1998. The impact of the earned income tax credit on incentives and income distribution. In Tax policy and the economy, edited James Poterba. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Macnaughton, Alan, Thomas Matthews, and Jeffrey Pittman. 1998. Stealth tax rates: Effective vs. statutory personal marginal tax rates. Canadian Tax Journal46 (56): 1029-66.
24.
Manning, Elliott, and Laurence Andress. 1996. The 1996 marginal federal income tax rates: The image and the reality. Tax Notes73 (13): 1585-1614.
25.
Popkin, William D.1998. Phantom tax rates. Tax Notes78 (11): 1409-17.
26.
Rupert, Timothy J., and Carol M. Fischer. 1995. An empirical investigation of taxpayer awareness of marginal tax rates. Journal of the American Taxation Association17 (Suppl.): 36-59.
27.
Rupert, Timothy J., Louise E. Single, and Arnold M. Wright. 2003. The impact of floors and phase-outs on taxpayers' decisions and understanding of marginal tax rates. Journal of the American Taxation Association25 (1): 72-86.
28.
Rupert, Timothy J., and Arnold M. Wright. 1998.The use of marginal tax rates in decision making: The impact of rate visibility. Journal of the American Taxation Association20 (2): 83-99.
29.
Saez, Emmanuel. 1999. Do taxpayers bunch at kink points? Working Paper No. 7366, National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
Siegel, Sidney. 1956. Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Slemrod, Joel. 1985. A nempirical test for tax evasion. Review of Economics and Statistics67 (2): 232-238.
32.
Slemrod, Joel, and Jon Bakija. 1996. Taxing ourselves: A citizen's guide to the great debate over tax reform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Steuerle, C. Eugene. 1992. The tax decade. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
34.
Steuerle, C. Eugene. 1997. Paying taxpayers to file electronic returns. Tax Notes77 (4): 477-478.
35.
Swift, Kenton D.1993. RRA '93 increases effect of phase-outs on marginal rates. Taxation for Accountants51 (6): 334-339.
36.
Tax report: Backdoor tax increases hit a rapidly growing number of people. 1998. Wall Street Journal, July 22, 1-1.
37.
Tax report: Hidden tax increases draw fire from a senior IRS official. 2000. Wall Street Journal, January 12, 1-1.
38.
Tax report: Stealth taxes face renewed assaults in Congress. 2001. Wall Street Journal, March 21, 1-1.
39.
Trist, Robert. 1990. Effective income taxation on the labor supply in the United States. Journal of Human Resources25 (3): 491-516.
40.
U.S. Congress. 1990. The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990. Public Law 101-508, 101st Cong., 2nd sess. (November 5).
41.
U.S. Congress. 1993. The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. Public Law 103-166, 103rd Cong., 1st sess. (August 10).
42.
U.S. Congress. 2001. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. Public Law 107-16, 107th Cong., 1st sess. (June 7).
43.
U.S. Congress. 2004. Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004. Public Law 108-311, 108th Cong., 2nd sess. (October 4).
44.
U.S. Congressional Budget Office. 1996. Labor supply and taxes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
