This article uses voting and sales data from the South Carolina Education Lottery to test whether the vote for a new lottery is driven by latent demand for lottery products or whether it reflects free-riding behavior or other public finance considerations. Including the predicted component of the lottery vote adds no explanatory power to a lottery sales regression. Given the dissimilarity of coefficients between vote and sales regressions, we conclude that there are significant differences in individuals' voting and buying behaviors. We find that the lottery vote is significantly higher in counties with underperforming schools and in counties along the state's borders, where cross-border shopping is an issue. We conclude that much of the variation in the vote is driven by these public finance issues. Finally, we discover that creation of the South Carolina lottery drew substantial revenues from North Carolina shoppers and stemmed an outflow of revenue to Georgia.
Alm, James, Michael McKee, and Mark Skidmore.1993. Fiscal pressure, tax competition, and the introduction of state lotteries. National Tax Journal46 (4): 463-76.
2.
Association of Religion Data Archives.2006 . The ARDA. http://www.thearda.com (accessed February 19, 2006).
3.
Caudill, Steven B., Jon M. Ford, Franklin G. Mixon Jr. , and Ter Chao Peng.1995. A discrete-time hazard model of lottery adoption. Applied Economics27 (6): 555-61.
4.
Clotfelter, Charles T.1979. On the regressivity of state-operated numbers games. National Tax Journal32 (4): 543-47.
5.
———. 2000. Do lotteries hurt the poor? Well, yes and no. Summary of testimony given to the House Select Committee on a State Lottery, April 28. http://www.pubpol.duke.edu/news/newsletters/dpn/summer00/lottery.html (accessed February 19, 2007).
6.
Clotfelter, Charles T., and Philip J. Cook.1987. Implicit taxation in lottery finance . National Tax Journal40 (4): 533-46.
7.
———. 1990. On the economics of state lotteries. Journal of Economic Perspectives4 (4): 105-19.
8.
Ellison, Christopher G., and Kathleen A. Nybroten .1999. Conservative Protestantism and opposition to state-sponsored lotteries: Evidence from the 1997 Texas poll. Social Science Quarterly80 (2): 356-69.
9.
Erekson, O. Homer, Glenn Platt, Christopher Whistler, and Andrea L. Ziegert .1999. Factors influencing the adoption of state lotteries. Applied Economics31 (7): 875-84.
10.
Filer, John E., Donald L. Moak, and Barry Uze.1988. Why some states adopt lotteries and others don't. Public Finance Quarterly16 (3): 259-83.
11.
Garrett, Thomas A., and Thomas L. Marsh .2002. The revenue impacts of cross-border lottery shopping in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Regional Science and Urban Economics32 (4): 501-19.
12.
Garrett, Thomas A., and Russell S. Sobel .2004. State lottery revenue: The importance of game characteristics. Public Finance Review32 (3): 313-30.
13.
Giacopassi, David, Mark W. Nichols, and B. Grant Stitt.2006. Voting for a lottery. Public Finance Review34 (1): 80-100.
14.
Greene, William.2000. Econometric analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
15.
Heckman, James J.1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47 (1): 153-61.
16.
Hersch, Philip L., and Gerald S. McDougall .1989. Do people put their money where their votes are? The case of lottery tickets. Southern Economic Journal56 (1): 32-38.
17.
Jackson, Raymond.1994. Demand for lottery products in Massachusetts. Journal of Consumer Affairs28 (2): 313-25.
18.
Martin, Robert, and Bruce Yandle.1990. State lotteries as duopoly transfer mechanisms. Public Choice64 (3): 253-64.
19.
Mixon, Franklin G., Jr., Steven B. Caudill, Jon M. Ford, and Ter Chao Peng.1997. The rise (or fall) of lottery adoption within the logic of collective action: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Economics and Finance21 (1): 43-49.
20.
Price, Donald I., and E. Shawn Novak. 1999. The tax incidence of three Texas lottery games: Regressivity, race, and education. National Tax Journal52 (4): 741-51.
21.
———. 2000. The income redistribution effects of Texas State Lottery games. Public Finance Review28 (1): 82-92.
22.
Rubenstein, Ross, and Benjamin Scafidi.2002. Who pays and who benefits? Examining the distributional consequences of the Georgia Lottery for Education. National Tax Journal55 (2): 223-38.
23.
Scott, Frank, and John Garen.1994. Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax. Journal of Public Economics54 (1): 121-43.
24.
South Carolina Department of Education.2006 . South Carolina Department of Education: Together, we can. http://ed.sc.gov/ (accessed February 19, 2006).
25.
South Carolina Education Lottery.2005. South Carolina Education Lottery. http://www.sceducationlottery.com (accessed February 19, 2006).
26.
South Carolina Election Commission. N.d. South Carolina Election Commission. http://www.state.sc.us/scsec/ (accessed February 19, 2006).
27.
Stover, Mark E.1990. Contiguous state lotteries: Substitutes or complements?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management9 (4): 565-68.
28.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. N.d. http://www.census.gov (accessed February 19, 2006).
