The Society of Wilderness (SOW) is a non-governmental organization in Taiwan that relies on volunteers to protect nature through environmental education. Since volunteers play such an important role in natural resource preservation, more information is needed to understand their participation in SOW. The purpose of this study was to develop an interpretation specialization continuum of environmental volunteerism in Taiwan. A mail-back survey was administered to interpreters volunteering at Er-ge Mountain during the winter of 2005. Forty-five of 48 questionnaires were returned, yielding a 93.8% response rate. The resource knowledge and place attachment scores of volunteer interpreters were combined into a 2 x 2 matrix, thus providing one explanation for their level of activity involvement in SOW. Although volunteer interpreters were distributed throughout the continuum, results showed that highly specialized interpreters had greater activity involvement scores than those who were less specialized. Length of membership in SOW had no effect on their activity involvement scores. This specialization continuum addressed key managerial issues, such as recruitment and retention of volunteer interpreters.
BrickerK., & KerstetterD. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists.Leisure Sciences, 22, 233–257.
2.
BryanH. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen.Journal of Leisure Research, 9, 174–187.
3.
ChenC., LinH., & WangK. (2003). The ideal operation of interpretation in an environmental non-government organization: The example of Society of Wilderness.Proceedings of the Environmental Education Conference (pp. 218–223). Hualien, Taiwan, R.O.C.: National Dong Hwa University.
4.
EwertA. (1994). Playing the edge: Motivation and risk-taking in a high altitude wildernesslike environment.Environment and Behavior, 26, 3–24.
GiulianiM., & FeldmanR. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 267–274.
7.
HammittW., KnaufL., & NoeF. (1989). A comparison of user versus researcher determined level of past experience on recreation preference.Journal of Leisure Research, 21, 202–213.
8.
HavitzM., & DimancheF. (1997). Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances.Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 245–278.
9.
HiltenJ., & HiltenR. (1997). A sense of place for environmental education and interpretation.Legacy, 8 (2), 10–13.
10.
HoS. (1998). A survey research of volunteer interpretation activity in Shei-Pa National Park. Unpublished master's thesis. National Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
11.
HopkinsT., & MoreR. (1995). The relationship of recreation specialization to the setting preferences of mountain bicyclists.Proceedings of the 1994 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-198, 71–75.
12.
HsuhC. (1998). A explore research: The learning of the volunteers in Kaohsiung Metropolitan Park and its relevant factors. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
13.
HsuhS., & LinM. (2000). Volunteer interpreters advocated environmental education in nongovernmental environmental organizations – A case study at the Hua-lien branch in Society of Wilderness. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
HuX. (1995). Exploring the development of environmental education at the beginning stage of Society of Wilderness. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
15.
JacobG., & SchreyerR. (1980). Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 368–380.
16.
JorgensonB.S., & StedmanR.C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 233–248.
17.
KyleG., GraefeA., ManningR., & BaconJ. (2004a). Predictors of behavioral loyalty among hikers along the Appalachian Trail.Leisure Sciences, 26, 99–118.
18.
KyleG., GraefeA., ManningR., & BaconJ. (2004b). Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists’ perceptions of setting density.Journal of Leisure Research, 36 (2), 209–231.
19.
KyleG., BrickerK., GraefeA., & WickhamT. (2004). An examination of recreationists’ relationships with activities and settings.Leisure Sciences, 26, 123–142.
20.
KyleG.T., AbsherJ., & GraefeA. (2003). The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences.Leisure Sciences, 25, 33–50.
21.
KyleG., GraefeA., ManningR., & BaconJ. (2003). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail.Journal of Leisure Research, 35 (3), 249–273.
22.
KyleG.T., KerstetterD.L., & GuadagnoloF.B. (2002). Market segmentation using participant involvement profiles.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 20 (1), 1–21.
23.
ManningR.E. (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation (2nd ed.). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
24.
McIntyreN. (1989). The personal meaning of participation: Enduring involvement.Journal of Leisure Research, 21, 167–179.
25.
McIntyreN., & PigramJ. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers.Leisure Sciences, 14, 3–15.
26.
MerrillK., & GraefeA. (1998). The relationship between activity specialization and preferences for settings and route attributes of selected rock climbers.Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-241, 40–43.
27.
MiltonB., ClevelandE., & Bennett-GatesD. (1995). Changing perceptions of nature, self, and others: A report on a park/school program.The Journal of Environmental Education, 26 (3), 32–39.
28.
MitchellM., ForceJ., CarrollM., & McLaughlinW. (1993). Forest places of the heart: Incorporating special places into public management.Journal of Forestry, 91 (4), 32–37.
29.
MooreR., & GraefeA. (1994). Attachment to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users.Leisure Sciences, 16, 17–31.
30.
MowenA., GraefeA., & VirdenR. (1998). A typology of place attachment and activity involvement.Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-241, 89–92.
31.
ProshankyH.M. (1978). The city and self-identity.Environment and Behavior, 10, 147–169.
32.
SalzR., LoomisD., & FinnK. (2001). Development and validation of a specialization index and testing of specialization theory.Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6, 239–258.
33.
SchreyerR., LimeD., & WilliamsD.R. (1984). Characterizing the influence of past experience on behavior.Journal of Leisure Research, 16 (1), 35–50.
34.
SchroederH. (2002). Experiencing nature in special places.Journal of Forestry, 100 (5), 8–14.
35.
SmaldoneD., HarrisC., SanyalN., & LindD. (2005). Place attachment and management of critical issues in Grand Teton National Park.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 23 (1), 90–114.
StokolsD., & ShumakerS.A. (1981). People and places: A transactional view of settings. In HarveyJ. (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 441–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
TuanY.F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perceptions, attitudes and values.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
TungY.F., & ZinnH.C. (2004). Motivations of volunteer interpreters in Taiwan.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (1), 27–39.
40.
VaskeJ., & KobrinK. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior.The Journal of Environmental Education, 32 (4), 16–21.
41.
WileyC.G.E., ShawS.M., & HavitzM.E. (2000). Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement.Leisure Sciences, 22, 19–31.
42.
WilliamsD., PattersonM., RoggenbuckJ., & WatsonA. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining the emotional and symbolic attachment to place.Leisure Sciences, 14, 29–46.
43.
WilliamsD., & StewartS. (1998). Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management.Journal of Forestry, 96 (5), 18–23.
44.
WilliamsD., & VaskeJ. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach.Forest Science, 49 (6), 830–840.
45.
WuH. (2005). A study of the perceptions, attitudes, and behavior toward ecotourism by members of the Environmental Protection Organization.Project report for the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 93-2511-S-142-007).
46.
WuH., & ChenJ. (2005). A 20 years overview and prospect of graduate interpretive research in Taiwan: 1984–2003.Journal of Interpretation Research, 10 (1), 59–66.
47.
ZhengY. (2004). Falling in love with the ocean because of dolphins and whales.CommonWealth Magazine, 300, 305–307.
