Aquarium Visitor Engagement with an Ocean Plastics Exhibit: Effects on Self-Reported Intended Single-Use Plastic Reductions and Plastic-Related Environmental Stewardship Actions
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2020
Aquarium Visitor Engagement with an Ocean Plastics Exhibit: Effects on Self-Reported Intended Single-Use Plastic Reductions and Plastic-Related Environmental Stewardship Actions
Plastic pollution requires, among a suite of other interventions, education to inspire behavioral change and reduce consumption of single-use items. We designed and installed an ocean plastics exhibit at the Oregon Coast Aquarium in Newport, Oregon, USA. We evaluated visitor engagement and the effects of the exhibit on their reported single-use plastic and plastic-related environmental stewardship intentions. Timed interaction observations (n = 317) revealed children (0–17 years) engaged more with interactive elements than adults (18–80+ years). Ten single-use plastic reduction and plastic stewardship intentions were evaluated through structured questionnaires; the top three behaviors visitors intended to change were: using a reusable straw (37.4%), cleaning the beach (37.4%), and bring-your-own bag to the store or market (33.0%). 18 to 29 year olds had the highest change in desire to address the ocean plastics problem before and after seeing the exhibit, but the lowest likelihood of engaging in either single-use plastics reduction or plastic stewardship actions of all age groups.
AutaH. S.EmenikeC. U.FauziahS. H. (2017). Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environment International, 102, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013
5.
BallantyneR.HughesK.LeeJ.PackerJ.SneddonS. (2018). Visitors’ values and environmental learning outcomes at wildlife attractions: Implications for interpretive practice. Tourism Management, 64, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.015
6.
BallantyneR.PackerJ.FalkJ. (2011). Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003
7.
BallantyneR.PackerJ.HughesK.DierkingL. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604
8.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
9.
BarnesD. K. A.GalganiF.ThompsonR. C.MortonB. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985–1998. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205
10.
BentonG. M. (2009). From principle to practice: Four conceptions of interpretation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 14(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258720901400102
11.
BitgoodS. (2000). The role of attention in designing effective interpretive labels. Journal of Interpretation Research, 5(2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258720000500205
12.
BludL. M. (1990). Social interaction and learning among family groups visiting a museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647779009515193
13.
BorrelleS. B.RingmaJ.LawK. L.MonnahanC. C.LebretonL.McGivernA.MurphyE.JambeckJ.LeonardG. H.HillearyM. A.EriksenM.PossinghamH. P.FrondH. D.GerberL. R.PolidoroB.TahirA.BernardM.MallosN.BarnesM.RochmanC. M. (2020). Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution. Science, 369(6510), 1515–1518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3656
BravoM.GallardoM.Luna-JorqueraG.NúñezP.VásquezN.ThielM. (2009). Anthropogenic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): Results from a national survey supported by volunteers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(11), 1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.017
16.
Briseño-GarzónA.AndersonD.AndersonA. (2007). Adult learning experiences from an aquarium visit: The role of social interactions in family groups. Curator: The Museum Journal, 50(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2007.tb00274.x
17.
BullockO. M.Colón AmillD.ShulmanH. C.DixonG. N. (2019). Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519865687
18.
ChampP. A.BishopR. C. (2001). Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011604818385
19.
ChaseN. L.DominickG. M.TrepalA.BaileyL. S.FriedmanD. B. (2009). This is public health: Recycling counts! description of a pilot health communications campaign. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(12), 2980–2991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6122980
20.
ChengJ.MonroeM. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082
21.
ClavijoK.KhalilK. (2020). Practical evaluation for conservation education and outreach: Assessing impacts and enhancing effectiveness. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.
22.
ClaytonS.FraserJ.SaundersC. D. (2009). Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28(5), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20186
23.
CohenU. (1987). Learning from children’s museums: Implications for design. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 4(1), 16–23.
24.
ColeM.LindequeP.HalsbandC.GallowayT. S. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(12), 2588–2597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025
25.
DavidsonD. J.FreudenburgW. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596283003
26.
DengLingzhiCaiLuSunFengyunLiGenCheYue. 2020. “Public Attitudes towards Microplastics: Perceptions, Behaviors and Policy Implications.”Resources, Conservation and Recycling163 (December): 105096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105096.
EllenbogenK. M.LukeJ. J.DierkingL. D. (2004). Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix?Science Education, 88(S1), S48–S58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20015
29.
EriksenM.LebretonL. C. M.CarsonH. S.ThielM.MooreC. J.BorerroJ. C.GalganiF.RyanP. G.ReisserJ. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: More than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS One, 9(12), e111913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111913
30.
FalkJ. H.AdelmanL. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10070
31.
HamS. H.KrumpeE. E. (1996). Identifying audiences and messages for nonformal environmental education – a theoretical framework for interpreters. Journal of Interpretation Research, 1(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258729600100103.
32.
HeidbrederL. M.BablokI.DrewsS.MenzelC. (2019). Tackling the plastic problem: A review on perceptions, behaviors, and interventions. Science of The Total Environment, 668, 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.437
33.
HohnS.Acevedos-TrejosE.AbramsJ. F.de MouraJ. F.SpranzR.MericoA. (2020). The long-term legacy of plastic mass production. Science of The Total Environment, 746, 141115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141115
34.
JambeckJ. R.GeyerR.WilcoxC.SieglerT. R.PerrymanM.AndradyA.NarayanR.LawK. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
35.
JensenE. A.MossA.GussetM. (2017). Quantifying long-term impact of zoo and aquarium visits on biodiversity-related learning outcomes. Zoo Biology, 36(4), 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21372
36.
JohnsonB.KubarekJ. (2019). Summary of evaluation findings: Oregon coast aquarium visitor research. PEER Associates. Retrieved April22, 2020, from https://peerassociates.net/productsarchive
37.
JohnsonT. P. (2014). Sources of error in substance use prevalence surveys. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/923290
38.
Kathryn Owen Consulting. (2015). Secrets of shipwrecks summative evaluation. Prepared for Oregon Coast Aquarium (Unpublished report).
39.
KnussenC.YuleF. (2008). “I’m not in the habit of recycling”: The role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307527
40.
KorkalaE. A. E.HuggT. T.JaakkolaJ. J. K. (2014). Awareness of climate change and the dietary choices of young adults in Finland: A population-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 9(5), e97480. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097480
41.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
42.
KühnS.Bravo RebolledoE. L.van FranekerJ. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In BergmannM.GutowL.KlagesM. (Eds.), Marine anthropogenic litter (pp. 75–116). Springer International Publishing.
43.
LauW. W. Y.ShiranY.BaileyR. M.CookE.StuchteyM. R.KoskellaJ.VelisC. A.GodfreyL.BoucherJ.MurphyM. B.ThompsonR. C.JankowskaE.CastilloA. C.PilditchT. D.DixonB.KoerselmanL.KosiorE.FavoinoE.GutberletJ.. . . PalardyJ. E. (2020). Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science, 369(6510), 1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9475
44.
LeisherC.MangubhaiS.HessS.WidodoH.SoekirmanT.TjoeS.WawiyaiS.Neil LarsenS.RumetnaL.HalimA.SanjayanM. (2012). Measuring the benefits and costs of community education and outreach in marine protected areas. Marine Policy, 36(5), 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.022
45.
LevyA.OrionN.LeshemY. (2018). Variables that influence the environmental behavior of adults. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1271865
46.
MarazziL.LoiselleS.AndersonL. G.RocliffeS.WintonD. J. (2020). Consumer-based actions to reduce plastic pollution in rivers: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach. PLoS One, 15(8), e0236410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236410
47.
MeistersJ.HoffmannA.MuschJ. (2020). Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243384
48.
MoussouriT. (1997). Family agendas and family learning in hands-on museums [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Leicester.
49.
NalvenK. B. (2019). Adapting the community based social marketing framework to create actionable messages about plastic pollution at the Oregon coast aquarium [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Oregon State University.
50.
NapperI. E.ThompsonR. C. (2020). Plastic debris in the marine environment: History and future challenges. Global Challenges, 4(6), 1900081. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201900081
51.
Nielsen-PincusM.SussmanP.BennettD. E.GosnellH.ParkerR. (2017). The influence of place on the willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Society & Natural Resources, 30(12), 1423–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1347976
52.
OhtomoS.OhnumaS. (2014). Psychological interventional approach for reduce resource consumption: Reducing plastic bag usage at supermarkets. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 84, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.014
53.
PahlS.WylesK. J. (2017). The human dimension: How social and behavioural research methods can help address microplastics in the environment. Analytical Methods, 9(9), 1404–1411. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02647H
54.
PhelanA.RossH.SetiantoN. A.FieldingK.PradiptaL. (2020). Ocean plastic crisis—Mental models of plastic pollution from remote Indonesian coastal communities. PLoS One, 15(7), e0236149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236149
55.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
56.
ReinhardE. M.VernonC. L.BronnenkantK.HeimlichJ. E.2007. Why Zoos & Aquariums Matter: Assessing the Impact of a Visit to a Zoo or Aquarium.
57.
RoseE.DiClementeR. J.WingoodG. M.McDermott SalesJ.LathamT. P.CrosbyR. A.ZenilmanJ.MelendezJ.HardinJ. (2009). The validity of teens’ and young adults’ self-reported condom use. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.509
58.
RossS. R.GillespieK. L. (2009). Influences on visitor behavior at a modern immersive zoo exhibit. Zoo Biology, 28(5), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20220
59.
SakellariM.SkanavisC. (2013). Environmental behavior and gender: An emerging area of concern for environmental education research. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 12(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2013.820633
60.
SchnurrR. E. J.AlboiuV.ChaudharyM.CorbettR. A.QuanzM. E.SankarK.SrainH. S.ThavarajahV.XanthosD.WalkerT. R. (2018). Reducing marine pollution from single-use plastics (SUPs): A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 137, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.001
61.
SerrellB. (1998). Paying attention: Visitors and museum exhibitions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; American Alliance Of Museums.
62.
ShulmanH. C.DixonG. N.BullockO. M.Colón AmillD. (2020). The effects of Jargon on processing fluency, self-perceptions, and scientific engagement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(5–6), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20902177
63.
SoaresJ.MiguelI.VenâncioC.LopesI.OliveiraM. (2021). Public views on plastic pollution: Knowledge, perceived impacts, and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 412, 125227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125227
64.
SternM. J. (2018). Social science theory for environmental sustainability: A practical guide. In Social science theory for environmental sustainability. Oxford University Press.
65.
SternM. J.PowellR. B. (2013). What leads to better visitor outcomes in live interpretation?Journal of Interpretation Research, 18(2), 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721301800202
66.
StoferK. A.LundgrenL.DunckelB.JamesV.LangeM.KriegerJ. (2019). Public engagement on climate and health in museums and participatory dialogues may Foster behavior change. Journal of STEM Outreach, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.10
67.
StorksdieckM.EllenbogenK.HeimlichJ. E. (2005). Changing minds? Reassessing outcomes in free-choice environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500081228
68.
SujataM.KhorK.-S.RamayahT.TeohA. P. (2019). The role of social media on recycling behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.08.005
69.
TakahashiB.SelfaT. (2015). Predictors of pro-environmental behavior in rural American communities. Environment and Behavior, 47(8), 856–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514521208
70.
VeigaJ. M.VlachogianniT.PahlS.ThompsonR. C.KopkeK.DoyleT. K.HartleyB. L.MaesT.OrthodoxouD. L.LoizidouX. I.AlampeiI. (2016). Enhancing public awareness and promoting co-responsibility for marine litter in Europe: The challenge of MARLISCO. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 102(2), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.031
71.
VeselyS.KlöcknerC. A. (2020). Social desirability in environmental psychology research: Three meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395
WiernikB. M. D.OnesD. Z.DilchertS. (2013). Age and environmental sustainability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7–8), 826–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0221
74.
WillisK.MaureaudC.WilcoxC.HardestyB. D. (2018). How successful are waste abatement campaigns and government policies at reducing plastic waste into the marine environment?Marine Policy, 96, 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.037
75.
WylesK. J.PahlS.WhiteM.MorrisS.CracknellD.ThompsonR. C. (2013). Towards a marine mindset: Visiting an aquarium can improve attitudes and intentions regarding marine sustainability. Visitor Studies, 16(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2013.768077
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
