An important limitation of conventional latent-growth modeling (LGM) is that it assumes that all individuals are drawn from one or more observed populations. However, in many applied-research situations, unobserved subpopulations may exist, and their different latent trajectories may be the focus of research to test theory or to resolve inconsistent prior research findings. Conventional LGM does not help to identify and predict these unobserved subpopulations. This article introduces the growth-mixture modeling (GMM) method for these purposes. Given that GMM handles longitudinal data (i.e., nesting of time observations within individuals) and identifies unobserved subpopulations (i.e., the nesting of individuals within latent classes), GMM can be construed as a multilevel modeling technique. The modeling procedure of GMM is illustrated on a simulated data set. Steps in the modeling process are highlighted and limitations, cautions, recommendations, and extensions of using GMM are discussed. Technical references for additional information are noted throughout.
Bhaskar-Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D.A., Shaffer, M.A., & Luk, D.M. (2005). Input-based and time-based models of international adjustment: Meta-analytic evidence and theoretical extensions. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 257-281.
4.
Biesanz, J.C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A.A., Bollen, K.A., & Curran, J.C. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30—52.
5.
Black, J.S., & Mendenhall, M. (1991). Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research. Academy of Management Review, 15, 113—136.
6.
Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin,107, 256—259.
7.
Calasanti, T.M. (1996). Gender and life satisfaction in retirement: An assessment of the male model. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 51B, S18—S29.
8.
Chan, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421—483.
9.
Chan, D. (2001). Latent growth modeling. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations (pp. 302—349). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190—210.
11.
Chou, C., Bentler, P.M., & Pentz, M.A. (1998). Comparisons of two statistical approaches to study growth curves: The multilevel model and the latent curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 247—266.
12.
Curran, P.J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529—569.
13.
Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Strycker, L.A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Fan, X. ( 2003). Power of latent growth modeling for detecting group differences in linear growth trajectory parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 380—400.
15.
Gall, T.L., Evans, D.R., & Howard, J. (1997). The retirement adjustment process: Changes in the well-being of male retirees across time. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P110—P117.
16.
Garst, H., Frese, M., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (2000). The temporal factor of change in stressor-strain relationships: A growth curve model on a longitudinal study in East Germany. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 417—438.
17.
Greenbaum, P.E., Del Boca, F.K., Darkes, J., Wang, C., & Goldman, M.S. (2005). Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshman college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology ,73, 229—238.
18.
Hair, J., & Black, W. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. Grimm & P. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147—206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
19.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424—453.
20.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1—55.
21.
Jedidi, K., Ramaswamy, V., & Desarbo, W.S. (1993). A maximum likelihood method for latent class regression involving a censored dependent variable. Psychometrika, 58, 375—394.
22.
Juster, F., & Suzman, R. (1995). The health and retirement study: An overview. Journal of Human Resources, 30 (Suppl.), 7—56.
23.
Kim, J.E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: A life-course, ecological model. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P212—P222.
24.
Little, R.J., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley & Sons.
25.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N.R., & Rubin, D.B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture . Biometrika, 88, 767—778.
26.
MacCallum, R., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin , 111, 490—504.
27.
Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin,103, 391—410.
28.
Matthews, A.M., & Brown, K.H. (1987). Retirement as a critical life event: The differential experiences of women and men. Research on Aging, 9, 548—571.
29.
McLachlan, G.J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika , 55, 107—122.
31.
Murphy, K.R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time?Human Performance, 2, 183—200.
32.
Muthén, B. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class-latent growth modeling. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291—322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345—368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Muthén, B., Brown, C.H., Masyn, K., Jo, B., Khoo, S.T., Yang, C.C., et al. (2002). General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics, 3, 459—475.
35.
Muthén, B., Jo, B., & Brown, H. (2003). Comment on the Barnard, Frangakis, Hill, & Rubin article, Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 311—314.
36.
Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2001). Mplus User's Guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463—469.
39.
Ployhart, R.E., & Hakel, M.D. (1998). The substantive nature of performance variability: Predicting interindividual differences in intraindividual performance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 859—901.
40.
Ross, C.E., & Drentea, P. (1998). Consequences of retirement activities for distress and the sense of personal control. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 317—334.
41.
Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461—464.
42.
Sclove, S.L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333—343.
43.
Wang, M. (2005). Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: Examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees' psychological well-being. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
44.
Wang, M., Hakel, M., Whinghter, L.J., Liao, F., & Liang, J. (2005). Examining different types of work experience on expatriate longitudinal performance. Poster presented at the 20th annual Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology conference , Los Angeles, CA.
45.
Willett, J.B., & Sayer, A.G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin,116, 363—381.
46.
Yang, C. (1998). Finite mixture model selection with psychometric applications. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
