Testing Reciprocal Relations by Nonrecursive Structuralequation Models Using Cross-Sectional Data

Abstract

Structural equation modeling has become a common technique to test the reciprocal relations between two constructs using cross-sectional data in management research. Although there are pros and cons to this application, it appears clear that sometimes it is necessary to use a cross-sectional nonrecursive model as an approximation of the cross-lagged reciprocal effects. Several factors (i.e., proper specification of the nonrecursive model, effects of instrumental variables, time interval, true cross-lagged effects, and sample size) that may affect the adequacy of the nonrecursive model are identified from the literature. Two examples using realistic parameters found in the literature are used to explore the potential effects of these factors in the application of a nonrecursive model. The article ends with a discussion of future research implications and recommendations of studies designed to test possible reciprocal relations between constructs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, S. E. , & Williams, L. J. (1992). Assumptions about unmeasured variables with studies of reciprocal relations: The case of employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 638-650.

Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos users’ guide version 3.6. Chicago: SPSS.

Bentler, P. M. (1992). EQS structural equations program manual. Chicago: BMDP Statistical Software.

Berry, W. D. (1984). Nonrecursive causal models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Cook, T. D. , & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Dwyer, J. H. (1983). Statistical models for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.

Earley, P. C. , & Lituchy, T. R. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 81-98.

Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Frone, M. R. , Russell, M. , & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65-78.

10.

Frone, M. R. , Russell, M. , & Cooper, M. L. (1994). Relation between job and family satisfaction: Causal or noncausal covariation? Journal of Management, 29(3), 565-579.

11.

Hunter, J. E. , & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267-320.

12.

James, L. R. , & Singh, B. K. (1978). An introduction to the logic, assumptions, and basic analytic procedures of two-stage least squares. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1104-1122.

13.

Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.

14.

Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL 8. Chicago: SPSS.

15.

Judge, T. A. , & Locke, E. A. (1993). Effect of dysfunctional thought processes on subject well-being and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 475-490.

16.

Lorenz, F. O. , Conger, R. D. , Simons, R. L. , & Whitbeck, L. B. (1995). The effects of unequal covariances and reliabilities on contemporaneous inference: The case of hostility and marital happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1049-1064.

17.

Mathieu, J. E. (1991). A cross-level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 607-618.

18.

Mathieu, J. E. , Hofmann, D. A. , & Farr, J. L. (1993). Job perception-job satisfaction relations: An empirical comparison of three competing theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 370-387.

19.

Medsker, G. J. , Williams, L. J. , & Holahan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20(2), 439-464.

20.

Meyer, J. P. , Allen, N. J. , & Gellatly, I. R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 710-720.

21.

Miller, D. , Dröge, C. , & Toulouse, J. (1988). Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 544-569.

22.

Organ, D. W. , & Bateman, T. S. (1991). Organizational behavior (4th ed.). Boston: Irwin.

23.

Rigdon, E. E. (1995). A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 359-383.

24.

Schaubroeck, J. (1990). Investigating reciprocal causation in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 17-28.

25.

Somers, M. J. (1993). A test of the relation between affective and continuance commitment using nonrecursive models. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 185-192.