Call centers have become an important customer access channel as well as an important source of customerrelated information. This boundary-spanning unit has finally enabled companies to take marketing’s commonplace wisdom of listening to the customer literally. As a result, there has been an increase in voice-to-voice service encounters and in these encounters listening as an essential skill. In this article, three dimensions of listening behavior are discerned: attentiveness, perceptiveness, and responsiveness. Results of an empirical study reveal that attentiveness is a direct driver of encounter satisfaction, whereas perceptiveness is primarily related to trust. Furthermore, the responsiveness dimension is related positively to both satisfaction and trust. In addition, we find a significant association between satisfaction and trust, and, finally, both a satisfactory evaluation of the voice-tovoice encounter and the build up of trust have a significant impact on the customer’s intention to contact the call center again in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, K. S.
and E. P. Hibbison (1986), Communication at Work: Listening, Speaking, Writing and Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Aiello, J. R.
and K. J. Kolb, (1995), “Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Risk Factor for Workplace Stress,” in Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, S. Sauter and L. R. Murphy, eds. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 163-180.
3.
Anderson, C.
and M. Martin (1995), “The Effects of Communication Motives, Interaction Involvement, and Communication Loneliness on Satisfaction,”Small Group Research, 26 (1), 118-137.
4.
Anderson, E. W.
and B. Weitz (1989), “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads,”Marketing Science, 4 (4), 310-323.
5.
Anton, J.
(1996), Call Center Management by the Numbers. Santa Maria, CA: Press on Regardless.
6.
Bagozzi, R. P.
and T. F. Heatherton (1994), “A General Approach to Representing Multifacted Personality Constructs: Application to State Self-Esteem,”Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.
7.
Bagozzi, R. P.
and Y. Yi (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16 (Spring), 74-94.
8.
Barker, L. L.
and D. A. Gaut (1996), Communication, 7th ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Baumgartner, H.
and C. Homburg (1996), “Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (2), 139-161.
10.
Bentler, P. M.
and C. Chou (1987), “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling,”Sociological Methods and Research, 16 (August), 78-117.
11.
Bollen, K. A.
(1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York: John Wiley.
12.
Brody, M.
(1994), “Listen Up! Do You Really Hear What People Are Saying?”American Salesman, 39, 14-14.
13.
Cowles, D.
and L. A. Crosby (1990), “Consumer Acceptance of Interactive Media,”Services Industries Journal, 10 (3), 521-540.
14.
Crosby, L. A.
, K. Evans, and D. Cowles (1990), “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 68-81.
15.
Dabholkar, P.
(1994), “Technology-Based Service Delivery: A Classification Scheme for Developing Marketing Strategies,” in Advances in Services Marketing and Management, Vol. 3, T. A. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, and S. W. Brown, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 241-272.
16.
Dawson, K.
(1998), The Call Center Handbook: The Complete Guide to Starting, Running and Improving Your Call Center. New York: Miller-Freeman.
17.
Dobbins, K.
(1996), “Achieving Customer Loyalty through Increased Usage of Teleservices,”Direct Marketing, 59 (November), 46-49.
18.
Frank, A. D.
and J. L. Brownell (1989), Organizational Communication and Behavior: Communicating to Improve Performance (2+2=5). Orlando FL: Darnell.
19.
Frazier, G. L.
, J. D. Gill, and S. H. Kale (1989), “Dealer Dependence Levels and Reciprocal Actions in a Channel of Distribution in a Developing Country,”Journal of Marketing, 53, 50-69.
20.
Gerbing, D. W.
and J. C. Anderson (1988), “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (May), 186-192.
21.
Hoelter, J. W.
(1983), “The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices,”Sociological Methods and Research,11 (February), 325-344.
22.
Hu, L. T.
and P. M. Bentler (1999), “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives,”Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
23.
Hulland, J.
, Y. H. Chow, and S. Lam (1996), “Use of Causal Models in Marketing Research,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 181-197.
24.
James, L. R.
, S. S. Mulaik, and J. M. Brett (1982), Causal Analysis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Jöreskog, K. G.
and D. Sörbom (1989), LISREL (r) 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
26.
Jöreskog, K. G.
and D. Sörbom (1993), LISREL (r) 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: SPSS Inc., and Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Kenny, D. A.
(1979), Correlation and Causality. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Lagace, R. R.
, R. Dahlstrom, and J. Gassenheimer (1991), “The Relevance of Ethical Salespeople Behavior on Relationship Quality: The Pharmaceutical Industry,”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 11 (Fall), 39-47.
29.
Larzelere, R. E.
and T. L. Huston (1980), “The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42 (August), 595-604.
30.
Lewis, M.
and N. L. Reinsch Jr. (1988), “Listening in Organizational Environments,”Journal of Business Communication, 25 (3), 49-67.
31.
Loehlin, J. C.
(1987), Latent Variable Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Mead, N. A.
(1986), “Listening and Speaking Skills Assessment,” in Performance Assessment: Methods and Applications, R. A. Berk, ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 509-521.
33.
Molloy, M.
(1996), “Romancing the Phone; A Little Irish Matchmaking Helps Europeans Fall in Love with American Marketers,”Direct Marketing, 59 (May), 40-43.
34.
Morgan, R. M.
and S. D. Hunt (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (July), 20-38.
35.
Netemeyer, R. G.
, M. W. Johnston, and S. Burton (1990), “Analysis of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity in a Structural Equations Framework,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (2), 148-157.
36.
Oliver, R. L.
(1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Osterhus, T. L.
(1997), “Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and How Do They Work,”Journal of Marketing, 61 (October), 16-29.
38.
Pearson, J. C.
and P. E. Nelson (1997), An Introduction to Human Communication; Understanding and Sharing. Dubuque, IA: Master.
39.
Ramsey, R. P.
and R. S. Sohi (1997), “Listening to Your Customers: The Impact of Perceived Salesperson Listening Behavior on Relationship Outcomes,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), 127-137.
40.
Selnes, F.
(1998), “Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Satisfaction in Buyer-Seller Relationships,”European Journal of Marketing, 32 (3/4), 305-322.
41.
Settoon, R. P.
, N. Bennett, and R. C. Liden (1996), “Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (3), 219-227.
42.
Trenholm, S.
(1995), Thinking through Communication: An Introduction to the Study of Human Communication. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
43.
Williams, L. J.
and J. T. Hazer (1986), “Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Model: A Reanalysis Using Latent Variable Structural Equation Methods,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (2), 219-231.
