U.K. studies have found that young people have a high tolerance of violence and abuse if committed within an interpersonal heterosexual relationship. This article draws on empirical data from a school-based study conducted with seventy-seven young people in Glasgow that explored their views and opinions of abuse and violence in interpersonal (heterosexual) relationships. A central finding is that there is profound contradiction in the views of the young people regarding what is interpersonal violence and about who is doing what to whom. The young people in this study were extremely ambivalent about acknowledging the predominance of men as the perpetrators of interpersonal violence, and where they did acknowledge this they constructed numerous justifications to explain it. This article presents these findings and explores the reasons for why these young people both resist accepting men as perpetrators of interpersonal violence and endeavor to justify it.
Alderson, P.2001. Research by children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology4(2): 139-153.
2.
Barter, C., and E. Renold.2000. "I wanna tell you a story": Exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology3:307-323.
3.
Burton, S., and J. Kitzinger with L. Kelly and L. Regan.1998. Young people's attitudes towards violence, sex and relationships: A survey and focus group study. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, University of London, and the Media Research Unit, Sociology Department, University of Glasgow: Zero Tolerance Trust.
Dublin Women's Aid.1999. Teenage tolerance: The hidden lives of young Irish people. A study of young people's experience and responses to violence and abuse. Dublin : Women's Aid.
6.
Dobash, R.E. and R.P. Dobash.1992. Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
7.
Dobash, R.E. and R.P. Dobash.2000. The politics and policies of responding to violence against women. In Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influences on policy and practice: A reader, edited by J. Hanmer and C. Itzin with S. Quaid and D. Wigglesworth.London: Routledge.
8.
Dobash, R.P., R.E. Dobash, M. Wilson, and M. Daly.1992. The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems39(1): 71-91.
9.
Donavan, C., M. Hester, J. Holmes, and M. McCarry.2006. Comparing domestic abuse in same sex and heterosexual relationships. Bristol: University of Bristol.
10.
Equal Opportunities Commission.2001. Young people and sex stereotyping. Equal Opportunities Commission Web site. Retrieved from http://www.eoc.org.uk/cseng/research/young_people_and_sex_stereotyping_findings.pdf
11.
Frosh, S., A. Phoenix, and R. Pattman.2002. Young masculinities. Hampshire: Palgrave.
12.
Hanmer, J., and C. Itzin.2000. Introduction: Prevention, provision and protection. In Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influences on policy and practice. A reader, edited by J. Hanmer and C. Itzin with S. Quaid and D. Wigglesworth.London: Routledge.
13.
Hearn, J.1998. The violences of men: How men talk and how agencies respond to men's violence to women. London: Sage.
14.
Hill, M., A. Laybourn, and M. Borland.1996. Engaging with primary-aged children about their emotions and well-being: Methodological considerations. Children and Society10: 129-144.
15.
Home Office.2003. Domestic violence and violence against women. Retrieved from http://www.home-office.gov.uk/crimpol/crimreduc/domviolence/index.html
16.
Home Office.2004. Domestic violence, crime and victims act. Retrieved from www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime/domesticviolence/
17.
Hood, S., P. Kelley, and B. Mayall.1996. Children as research subjects: A risky enterprise. Children and Society10: 117-128.
18.
Johnson, M.P.1995. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family57 (2): 283-294.
19.
Johnson, H.1998. Rethinking survey research on violence against women. In Rethinking violence against women, edited by R. E. Dobash and R. F. Dobash.London: Sage.
20.
Kenway, J., and L. Fitzclarence .1997. Masculinity, violence and schooling: Challenging `poisonous pedagogies'. Gender and Education9 (1): 117-134.
21.
Kitzinger, J., and R.S. Barbour.1999. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger.London: Sage.
22.
Krueger, R.A.1994. 2nd ed. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage.
23.
Kurz, D.1993. Social science perspectives in wife abuse: Current debates and future directions. In Violence against women: The bloody footprints, edited by P. B. Bart and E. G. Moran.London : Sage.
24.
Mac an Ghaill, M. 1994. The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.
25.
McCarry, M.2003. The connection between masculinity and domestic violence: What young people think. University Of Bristol, unpublished PhD thesis.
26.
Messerschmidt, J.W.2000. Becoming `real men': Adolescent masculinity challenges and sexual violence. Men and Masculinities2(3): 286-307.
27.
Mullender, A., G. Hague, U. Imam, L. Kelly, E. Malos, and L. Regan.2002. Children's perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage.
28.
Nspcc.2005. Teen abuse survey of Great Britain, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.nspcc.org.uk
29.
Oakley, A. 1994. Women and children first and last: Parallels and differences
30.
between children's and women's studies. In Children's childhoods: Observed and experienced, edited by B. Mayall. London: Falmer Press.
31.
O'Donnell, M., and S. Sharpe.2000. Uncertain masculinities: Youth, ethnicity and class in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.
32.
Rosen, D.2004. "I just let him have his way": Partner violence in the lives of low-income, teenage mothers. Violence Against Women10 (1): 6-28.
33.
Saunders, D.G.1988. Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In Feminist perspectives on wife abuse, edited by K. Yllo and M. Bograd.London: Sage.
34.
Scottish Executive.2000. Scottish Partnership on Domestic Abuse, National Strategy to Address Domestic Abuse inScotland. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/law/stra-01.asp
35.
Scottish Executive.2001. Protection from abuse (Scotland) Act 2001. Retrieved from www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/bills/billsPassed/b30bs1.pdf
36.
Sharpe, S.1994. Just like a girl: How girls learn to be women, from the seventies to the nineties. London: Penguin Books.
37.
Stark, E.2007. Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
38.
Totten, M.2003. Girlfriend abuse as a form of masculinity construction among violent, marginal male youth. Men and Masculinities6 (1): 70-92.
39.
Wilkinson, S.1998. Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum21(1): 111-125.
40.
Yllo, K.1983. Using a feminist approach in quantitative research: A case study. In The dark side of families: Current family violence research, edited by D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling , and M. A. Straus.London: Sage.
41.
Yllo, K.1993. Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In Current controversies on family violence, edited by R. J. Gelles and D. R. Loseke.London: Sage.
42.
Xenos, S., and D. Smith.2001. Perceptions of rape and sexual assault among Australian adolescents and young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence16 (11): 1103-1119.
