This exploratory study demonstrates the effectiveness of using practice-based and client-focused active learning exercises to develop applied skills and better position the student as a candidate with both practical competencies and strong book knowledge. Findings from surveys of business managers indicate the need for real-world application of the skills and knowledge taught in the classroom.
Two sections of an undergraduate Integrated Marketing Communications course (60 students) completed an active learning, practice-based pedagogical instrument involving Nielsen Academics and client-focused exercises.
A 2 (group: experimental vs. control) × 2 (section) ANOVA with students’ quiz scores as the dependent variable showed the group main effect was the only significant effect. The combination of the Nielsen Academics technology and the client-focused exercises yielded stronger learning outcomes. Not only did students gain experience in media buying and scheduling, but also their knowledge of each was significantly higher than that of students in the control group.
Askim-LovsethM. K.O'KeefeT. P. (2012).
Enhancing the interdisciplinary perspective in the marketing management decision process through an applied, integrated, client project.Marketing Education Review,
22(1), 61–66.
2.
BobotL. (2010).
Teaching sales and negotiation with combining computer-based simulation and case discussions.Marketing Education Review,
20(2), 115–122.
3.
BuzzardC.CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F.McCartyP. (2011).
The use of digital technologies in the classroom: A teaching and learning perspective.Journal of Marketing Education,
33(2), 131–139.
4.
CraciunG.Corrigan, H. B. (2009).
An integrative experiential learning project in the undergraduate branding course: Creating a marketing department brochure.Journal of Marketing Education,
32(2), 116–127.
5.
D’AloisioA. (2006).
Motivating students through awareness of the natural correlation between college learning and corporate work settings.College Teaching,
54, 225–230.
6.
DatarS. M.Garvin, D.Cullen, P. G. (2010). Rethinking the MBA: Business education at a crossroads.
Boston, MA:
Harvard Business School Publishing.
7.
DiamondN.KoernigS. K.IqbalZ. (2008).
Uniting active and deep learning to teach problem-solving skills: Strategic tools and the learning spiral.Journal of Marketing Education,
30(2), 116–129.
8.
EastmanS. T.FergusonD. (2012). Media programming: Strategies and practices (9th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Wadsworth Publishing.
9.
FinchD.NadeauJ.O'ReillyN. (2013).
The future of marketing education: A practitioner's perspective.Journal of Marketing Education,
35(1), 54–67.
10.
GillentineA.SchulzJ. (2001).
Marketing the fantasy football league: Utilization of simulation to enhance sports marketing concepts.Journal of Marketing Education,
23(3), 178–186.
HergertM. (2009).
Student perceptions of the value of internships in business education.American Journal of Business Education,
2(8), 9–13.
13.
HopkinsC. D.RaymondM. A.CarlsonL. (2011).
Educating students to give them a sustainable competitive advantage.Journal of Marketing Education,
33(3), 337–347.
14.
KaltchevaV. D.WeitzB. A. (2006).
When should a retailer create an exciting store environment?Journal of Marketing,
70(1), 107–118.
15.
MantelS.PullinsE. B.ReidD. A.BuehrerR. E. (2002).
A realistic sales experience: Providing feedback by integrating buying, selling, and managing experiences. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management,
22(1), 33–40.
16.
McCorkleD. E.AlexanderJ. F.ReardonJ. (2001).
Integrating business technology and marketing education: Enhancing the diffusion process through technology champions.Journal of Marketing Education,
23(1), 16–24.
17.
McDanielC.GatesR. (2015). Marketing research (10th ed.).
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18.
MitchellT.StraussJ. (2001).
Practitioner and academic recommendations for internet marketing and E-commerce curricula.Journal of Marketing Education,
23(2), 91–102.
19.
NeillM. S.SchausterE. (2015).
Gaps in advertising and public relations education: Perspectives of agency leaders.Journal of Advertising Education,
19(2), 5–17.
20.
NewberryR.CollinsM. K. (2012).
A recruiting and hiring role-play: An experiential simulation.Marketing Education Review,
22(1), 67–72.
21.
ParkerB. (2000).
Putting it all together: Effective participation in advertising competitions. Journal of Advertising Education,
4(1), 19–29.
22.
RubinR. S.DierdorffE. C. (2009).
How relevant is the MBA? Assessing the alignment of required curricula and required managerial competencies.Academy of Management and Learning,
8(2), 208–224.
23.
RubinR. S.DierdorffE. C. (2011).
On the road to Abilene: Time to manage agreement about MBA curricula relevancy.Academy of Management and Learning,
10(2), 148–161.
24.
Seung-ChulY.MorrisP. (2015).
An exploratory study of successful advertising internships: A survey based on paired data of interns and employers.Journal of Advertising Education,
19(1), 5–16.
25.
ShakarianD. (1995).
Beyond lecture: Active learning strategies that work.Journal of Physical Education, Health, Recreation and Dance,
66, 21–24.
26.
SmithL.Van DorenD. (2004).
The reality-based learning method: A simple method for keeping teaching activities relevant and effective.Journal of Marketing Education,
26(1), 66–74.
27.
SojkaJ. Z.FishM. S. B. (2008).
Brief in-class role plays: An experiential teaching tool targeted to generation Y students.Marketing Education Review,
18(1), 25–31.
