American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66 (pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Farley, J. (1991). Sociotechnical theory: An alternative framework for evaluation. In C. L. Larson & H. Preskill (Eds.), Organizations in transition: Opportunities and challenges for evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 49 (pp. 51-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Hess, P. M., & Mullen, E. J. (Eds.). (1995). Practitioner-researcher partnerships: Building knowledge from, in and for practice. Washington, D.C.: NASW Press.
5.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Mabry, L. (1999). Circumstantial ethics. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 199-212.
7.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Preskill, H. (1991). The cultural lens: Bringing utilization into focus. In C. L. Larson & H. Preskill (Eds.), Organizations in transition: Opportunities and challenges for evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 49 (pp. 5-15). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Schwandt, T. (1991). Evaluation as moral critique. In C. L. Larson & H. Preskill (Eds.), Organizations in transition: Opportunities and challenges for evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 49 (pp. 63-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Schwandt, T. (1998). Commentary: Moral demands and strong evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 227-229.
11.
Task Force on Social Work Research. (1991). Building social work knowledge for effective services and policies: A plan for research development. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, School of Social Work.
12.
Voluntary Sector Evaluation Research Project (VSERP). (2000). Funded by the Community University Research Alliance (CURA) program. Ottawa: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
13.
Whitmore, E. (1998). Final commentary. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, No. 80 (pp. 95-99). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Whitmore, E., & McKee, C. (2000). Six street youth who could.... In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 397-402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Zimmerman, B. J., Lindberg, C., & Plsek, P. (2000). Edgeware: Insights from complexity science for health care leaders. www.plexusinstitute.com/edgeplace.
