Biklen, S.K., & Bogdan, R. (1986). On your own with naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Bogdan, R., Brown, M.A., & Foster, S.B. (1982). Be honest but not cruel: Staff-parent communication on a neo-natal unit. In S. J. Taylor & R. Bogdan (Eds.), Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Cahan, L., Filby, N., McCutcheon, G., & Kyle, D. (1983). Class size and instruction. New York: Longman.
4.
Denzin, N.K. (1978). Sociological methods. New York : McGraw-Hill.
5.
Eisner, E.W. (1979). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan.
6.
Farley, F. (1986). The debate. MidwesternEducational Researcher, 7, 5-33.
7.
Farrar, E., & House, E.R. (1983). The evaluation of Push/ Excel: A case study. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.). Stakeholder-based evaluation: Vol. 30. New Directions for program evaluation. (Vol. 17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Conceptual crossroads: Methods and ethics in ethnographic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalisticevaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays . New York: Basic Books.
10.
Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (in press). The countenances of fourth-generation evaluation: Description, judgment, and negotiation. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Hebert, Y.M. (1986). Naturalistic evaluation in practice: A case study . In D. D. Williams (Ed.). Naturalistic evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. Paper accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Kansas City, MO, October 30-November 1, 1986.
15.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1986a). Research, evaluation, and policy analysis: Heuristics for disciplined inquiry. Policy Studies Review, 5, 546-565.
16.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1986b). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Lucas, W. (1974a). The case survey and alternative methods for research aggregation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
18.
Lucas, W. (1974b). The case survey method: aggregating case experience . Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
19.
Morgan, G. (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
National Institute of Education. (1978). Evaluation of Project Excel (FRP-NIE-R-78-0026). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
21.
Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Pierce, W.S. (1981). Bureaucratic failure and public expenditure. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Roncek, D.W., & Weinberger, G.E. (1981). Neighborhoods of leased public housing. Evaluation Review, 5, 231-244.
24.
Sieber, S.D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods . American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335-1359.
25.
Skrtic, T.M., Guba, E.G., & Knowlton, H.E. (1985). Interorganizational special education programming in rural areas: Technical report on a multisite naturalistic field study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
26.
Smircich, L. (1986). Behind the debate over the validity of alternative paradigm research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles.
27.
Smith, M.L. (1986). The whole is greater: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in evaluation studies. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic Evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Smith, L.N., & Kleine, P.G. (1986). Qualitative research and evaluation: Triangulation and multimethods reconsidered. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic Evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Swann, A.C. (1986). A naturalistic study of the art-making process in a pre-school setting. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
30.
Stake, R.E. (1978). Should educational evaluation be more objective or more subjective? More subjective! Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto.
31.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1982). Housing block grant activity in Dallas: A case study (CED-82-75). Washington, DC: General Accounting Office .
32.
Williams, D. D. (Ed.). (1986a). Naturalistic evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Williams, D. D. (Ed.). (1986b). Editor's notes. Naturalistic evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
34.
Williams, D. D. (Ed.). (1986c). When is naturalistic evaluation appropriate? Naturalistic evaluation: Vol. 30. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.