Commentary: Can This Evaluation Be Saved?

American Evaluation Association , Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators . (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 19-26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chelimsky, E. (1987). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8, 5-21.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation . (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mowbray, C. T. (1988). Getting the system to respond to evaluation findings. In J. A. McLaughlin , I. J. Weber , R. W. Covert , & R. B. Ingle (Eds.), Evaluation utilization. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 39, 47-58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Posavac, E. J. (1994). Misusing program evaluation by asking the wrong question. In C. J. Stevens & M. Dial (Eds.), Preventing the misuse of evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 64, 69-78. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Posavac, E. J. , & Carey, R. G. (1992). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Preskill, H. , & Caracelli, V. (1997). Current and developing conceptions of use: Evaluation Use TIG survey results. Evaluation Practice, 18, 209-225.

Russ-Eft, D. (1986). Evaluability assessment of the Adult Education Program (AEP): The results and their use. Evaluation and Program Planning, 9, 39-47.

Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Vroom, P. I. , Colombo, M. , & Nahan, N. (1994). Confronting ideology and self-interest: Avoiding misuse of evaluation. In C. J. Stevens & M. Dial (Eds.), Preventing the misuse of evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 64, 49-59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.