Policing has become decentered from the state as substate and transnational developments have shifted some of the roles and authority for policing to new social and international groups and agencies. At the international level, a number of regime communities (e.g., scholars, nongovernmental organizations, police leaders, transnational policy makers, and policy think tanks) have actively promoted the emergence of a democratic, international policing regime and its adoption by states and police forces in transitional, failed, and developed countries. Recent developments are described, and their implications for the practices and the study of policing are assessed.
Amir, M., & Einstein, S. (Eds.). (2001). Policing, security and democracy (Vols. 1-2). Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University, Office of International Criminal Justice.
2.
Anderson, M. (1989). Policing the world: Interpol and the politics of international police cooperation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
3.
Anderson, M. (1997). Interpol and the developing system of international police cooperation. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.), Crime and law enforcement in the global village (pp. 89-121). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Anderson, M. (2000). The transformation of border controls: A European precedent? In P. Andreas & T. Snyder (Eds.), The wall around the West: State borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe (pp. 15-29). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
5.
Anderson, M., Apap, J., & Mulkins, C. (2001). Policy alternatives to Schengen border controls on the future EU external frontier: Proceedings of an expert seminar. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies.
6.
Association of European Police Colleges. (2002a). Europe, Police, Polizei, Police: Calendar of courses. Groningen, the Netherlands: Author.
7.
Association of European Police Colleges. (2002b). European curriculum for police training in central and eastern European countries. Groningen, the Netherlands: Author.
8.
Bayley, D. H. (1985). Patterns of policing. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
Bayley, D. H. (1995). A foreign policy for democratic policing. Policing and Society, 5(2), 79-94.
10.
Bayley, D. H. (1999). The contemporary practices of policing: A comparative view. In J. Burack, W. Lewis,&E. Marks (Eds.), A role for democratic policing, civilian police and multinational peacekeeping: A workshop series (pp. 3-7). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11.
Bayley, D. H. (2001). Democratizing the police abroad: What to do and how to do it. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
12.
Bayley, D. H. (2002). Law enforcement and the rule of law: Is there a tradeoff?Criminology & Public Policy, 2(1), 133-154.
13.
Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (1996). The future of policing. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 585-606.
14.
Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (2001). The new structure of policing: Description, conceptualization and research agenda. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15.
Bigo, D. (2000). Liaison officers in Europe: New officers in the European security field. In J.W.E. Sheptycki (Ed.), Issues in transnational policing (pp.67-99). London: Routledge.
16.
Brodeur, J.P. (1983). High policing and low policing: Remarks about the policing of political activities. Social Problems, 30, 507-520.
17.
Brodeur, J. P. (Ed.). (1998). How to recognize good policing: Problems and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Brogden, M. (1982). The police: Autonomy and consent. New York: Academic Press.
19.
Brogden, M. (1999). Community policing as cherry pie. In R. I. Mawby (Ed.), Policing across the world (pp. 167-186). London: UCL Press.
20.
Brogden, M., & Shearing, C. (1993). Policing for a New South Africa. London: Routledge.
21.
Call, C. T. (2003). Challenges in police reform: Promoting effectiveness and accountability (IPA Policy Report). New York: United Nations.
22.
Caparini, M. (2002). Lessons learned and upcoming research issues in democratic control of armed forces and security sector reform. In H. Born, M. Caparini, & P. Fluri (Eds.), Security sector reform and democracy in transitional societies (pp. 207-216). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
23.
Caparini, M. (2003). Security sector reform and NATO and EU enlargement. In Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Ed.), SIPRI yearbook 2003: Armaments, disarmament and international security. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Caparini, M., & Marenin, O. (2002, November). Reform and progress in the policing systems of central and eastern European states. Paper presented at the Workshop on Police Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, Prague, Czech Republic.
25.
Center for European Policy Studies. (2001, July). New European borders and security cooperation: Promoting trust in an enlarged European Union (Conference report). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
26.
Chan, J. B. L. (1997). Changing police culture: Policing in a multicultural society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Chan, J. B. L. (2001). The technological game: How information technology is transforming police practice. Criminal Justice, 1(2), 139-159.
28.
Chanaa, J. (2002). Security sector reform: Issues, challenges and prospects (Adelphi Paper No. 344). London: Institute for Strategic Studies.
29.
Council of Europe. (2000). Police powers and accountability in a democratic society. Paper presented at the 12th Criminological Colloquium, Strasbourg, France.
30.
Das, D., & Marenin, O. (Eds.). (2000). Challenges of policing democracies: A world perspective. Newark, NJ: Gordon & Breach.
31.
Das, D., & Palmiotto, M. J. (2002). International human rights standards: Guidelines for the world’s police officers. Police Quarterly, 5(2), 206-221.
32.
Deflem, M. (2003). Policing world society: Historical foundations of international police cooperation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
Della Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (Eds.). (1998). Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in Western democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
den Boer, M. (1999). Organisational changes within the police and prosecution services of the EU member states as a consequence of the fight against organised crime: The intersection between national and EU policies. Paper presented at the Occasion of the Falcone Round Table, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
35.
Department for International Development. (2002). Understanding and supporting security sector reform. London: Author.
36.
Dixon, B. (2000). The globalisation of democratic policing: Sector policing and zero tolerance in the new South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town, Institute of Criminology.
37.
Dutton, M. (2000). The end of the (mass) line? Chinese policing in the era of contract. Social Justice, 27(2), 61-105.
38.
Ericson, R. (1994). The division of expert knowledge in policing and security. British Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 149-175.
39.
Fijnaut, C. (Ed.). (1993). The internationalization of police co-operation in western Europe. Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation.
40.
Findlay, M., & Zvekic, U. (Eds.). (1993). Alternative policing styles: Cross-cultural perspectives. Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation.
41.
Friedman, R. R. (1992). Community policing: Comparative perspectives and prospects. New York: St. Martin’s.
42.
Gamarra, E. A. (1996). Implementing the Summit of the Americas: Combating illegal drugs and related crimes (North-South Center Working Paper). Miami, FL: University of Miami.
43.
Garcia, J. Z. (2002). Security regimes on the U.S.-Mexico border. In J. Bailey & J. Chabat (Eds.), Transnational crime and public security: Challenges to Mexico and the United States (pp. 299-334). San Diego: University of California.
44.
Garland, D. (1996). The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology, 36(4), 445-471.
45.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces. (2001, April). Security sector reform and managing the context of police reform. Proceedings of the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
47.
Goldsmith, A., & Lewis, C. (Eds.). (2000). Civilian oversight of policing: Governance, democracy and human rights. Oxford, UK: Hart.
48.
Gottlieb, G., Krözsel, K., & Prestel, B. (1998). Die reform der Ungarischen polizei: Vorgehen, methoden, resultate [The reform of the Hungarian police: Processes, methods, results]. Holzkirchen, Germany: Felix-Verlag.
49.
Haberfeld, M. R. (1997). Poland: The police are not the public and the public are not the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 20, 641-654.
50.
Haberfeld, M. R. (2002). Critical issues in police training. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
51.
Haberfeld, M. R., Klockars, C. B., Kutjnak Ivkovich, S., & Pagon, S. (2000). Police officer perceptions of the disciplinary consequences of police corruption in Croatia, Poland, Slovenia, and the United States. International Journal of Police Practice and Research, 1(1), 34-51.
52.
Hansen, A. (2002). From Congo to Kosovo: Civilian police in peace operations (Adelphi Paper No. 343). London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
53.
Hebenton, B., & Thomas, T. (1995). Policing Europe: Co-operation, conflict and control. New York: St. Martin’s.
54.
Henderson, D. (1999). A review of security sector reform (Working Paper No. 1). London: King’s College London, Centre for Defence Studies.
55.
Henderson, D., & Karkoszka, A. (2002). The challenges of security sector reform. In Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Ed.), SIPRI yearbook 2002: Armaments, disarmament and international security. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56.
Heyman, P. B. (1992). Creating democratic law enforcement institutions in eastern Europe, Latin America, and South Africa. Paper presented at the Alan Fortunoff Criminal Justice Colloquium, New York.
57.
Hills, A. (1996). Low intensity conflict and law enforcement in sub-Saharan Africa. Low Intensity Conflict and Law Enforcement, 5(1), 1-17.
58.
Hills, A. (2000). Policing Africa: Internal security and the limits of liberalization. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
59.
Hobbing, P. (2000). Polizeiliche zusammenarbeit in Europa 2000: Sachstand und anforderungen aus sicht der kommission [Police cooperation in Europe 2000: Current situation and requirements from the point of view of the commission]. Paper presented at Seminar Lagebild Innere Sicherheit in Europa, Polizeiliche Fuhrungsakademie, Hiltrup, Germany.
60.
Hoogenboom, A. B. (1991). Grey policing: A theoretical framework. Policing and Society, 2(1), 17-30.
61.
Huggins, M. K. (1998). Political policing: The United States and Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
Huggins, M. K. (2000). Violence and police privatization in Brazil. Social Justice, 27(2), 113-134.
63.
Huisman, S. (2002). Transparency and accountability of police forces, security services and intelligence agencies (TAPAS): A comparative assessment of the effectiveness of existing arrangements in seven countries: Bulgaria, France, Italy, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Groningen, the Netherlands: Centre for European Security Studies.
64.
Hutchful, E. (2003). Security sector governance in Africa. Accra, Ghana: African Security Dialogue and Research.
65.
Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland. (1999). A new beginning: Policing in Northern Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.belfast.org.uk/report.html
66.
Inter-American Development Bank. (1997). Studies of the magnitude, costs and policies against violence in six places: Lima, Rio de Janeiro, San Salvador, Mexico, Venezuela and Colombia. Washington, DC: Author.
67.
International Council on Human Rights Policy. (2003, March). Crime, public order and human rights (Draft report for consultation). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
68.
International Crisis Group. (2002). Policing the police in Bosnia: A further reform agenda (Balkans Report No. 130). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
69.
Jobard, F. (2000). Un et un font un: L’alchemie policière dans le Berlin on voie de réunification [One and one makes one: The magical transformation of policing in Berlin on the road to reunification]. Cahiers de la Sécurite Intérieure, 41(1), 119-140.
70.
John Jay College of Criminal Justice. (1996). Human dignity and the police: Morality, integrity and professional ethics in police work. New York: Author.
71.
Johnston, L. (1992). The rebirth of private policing. London: Routledge.
72.
Johnston, L. (1998). Late modernity, governance, and policing. In J. P. Brodeur (Ed.), How to recognize good policing: Problems and issues (pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
Jones, T., Newburn, T., & Smith, T. J. (1996). Policing and the idea of democracy. British Journal of Criminology, 36(2), 182-198.
74.
Kádár, A. (Ed.). (2001). Police in transition: Essays on the police forces in transition countries. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.
75.
Karstedt, S. (2001). Comparing cultures, comparing crime: Challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 36, 285-308.
76.
Karstedt, S. (2002). Durkheim, Tarde and beyond: The global travel of crime policies. Criminal Justice, 2(2), 111-123.
77.
Koenig, D., & Das, D. (Eds.). (2001). International police cooperation. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
78.
Kraska, P. (Ed.). (2001). Militarizing the American criminal justice system: The changing roles of the armed forces and the police. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
79.
Lab, S. P., & Das, D. K. (Eds.). (2003). International perspectives on community policing and crime prevention. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
80.
Larsen, J. I. (2002). Police forces with military status in international peace operations: Preliminary findings. Kjeller, Norway: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.
81.
Law Commission of Canada. (2002). In search of security: The roles of the public police and private agencies. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
82.
Lia, B. (2002). Building a police without a state: The PLO, the donor community, and the establishment of the Palestinian police and security forces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
83.
Loader, I. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governance. Social and Legal Studies, 9(3), 323-345.
84.
Loader, I. (2002). Policing, securitization and democratization in Europe. Criminal Justice, 2(2), 125-153.
85.
Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2001). Policing as a public good: Reconstituting the connections between policing and the state. Theoretical Criminology, 5(1), 9-35.
86.
Los, M., & Zybertowicz, A. (2001). Privatizing the police state: The case of Poland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
87.
Loveday, B. (1999). Government and accountability of the police. In R. I. Mawby (Ed.), Policing across the world: Issues for the twenty-first century (pp. 132-150). London: UCL Press.
88.
MacDonald, W. F. (Ed.). (1997). Crime and law enforcement in the global village. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
89.
Mani, R. (1999). Contextualizing police reform: Security, the rule of law, and post-conflict peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 6(4), 9-26.
90.
Manning, P. K. (1998a). Media loops. In F. Bailey & D. Hale (Eds.), Popular culture, crime and justice (pp. 25-39). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
91.
Manning, P. K. (1998b). Police work: The social organization of policing (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92.
Manning, P. K. (2000). Policing new social spaces. In J. Sheptycki (Ed.), Issues in transnational policing (pp. 177-200). London: Routledge.
93.
Manning, P. K. (2001). Technology’s ways: Information technology, crime analysis and the rationalizing of policing. Criminal Justice, 1(1), 83-103.
94.
Marenin, O. (1990). The police and the coercive nature of the state. In E. S. Greenberg & T. F. Mayer (Eds.), Changes in the state: Causes and consequences (pp. 115-130). Newbury Park: Sage.
95.
Marenin, O. (1998a). The goal of democracy in international police assistance programs. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 21(1), 159-177.
96.
Marenin, O. (1998b). From IPA to ILEA: Change and continuity in United States’ international police training programs. Police Quarterly, 1(4), 93-126.
97.
Mawby, R. C. (2002). Continuity and change, convergence and divergence: The police and practice of police-media relations. Criminal Justice, 2(3), 303-324.
98.
McHugh, H. S. (1994). Key issues in police training: Lessons learned from USAID experience. Washington, DC: The United States Agency for International Development.
99.
McLaughlin, E. (1992). The democratic deficit: European Union and the accountability of the British police. British Journal of Criminology, 32(4), 473-487.
100.
Nadelmann, E. A. (1993). Cops across borders: The internationalization of U.S. criminal law enforcement. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
101.
Nadelmann, E. A. (1997). The Americanization of global law enforcement: The diffusion of American tactics and personnel. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.), Crime and law enforcement in the global village (pp. 123-138). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
102.
Neild, R. (2001). Democratic police reforms in war-torn societies. Washington, DC: Washington Office on Latin America.
103.
Neild, R. (2002). Sustaining reform: Democratic policing in Central America. Washington, DC: Washington Office on Latin America.
104.
Neyroud, P., & Beckley, A. (2001). Policing, ethics and human rights. Devon, UK: Willan.
105.
Oakley, R. B., & Dziedzic, M. J. (1998). Conclusions. In R. B. Oakley, M. J. Dziedzic, & E. M. Goldberg (Eds.), Policing the new world disorder: Peace operations and public security (pp. 509-535). Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
106.
O’Rawe, M. (2003). Transitional policing arrangements in Northern Ireland: The can’t and the won’t of the change dialectic. Fordham International Law Journal, 26(4), 1015-1073.
107.
O’Rawe, M., & Moore, L. (1997). Human rights on duty: Principles for better policing: International lessons for Northern Ireland. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Committee for the Administration of Justice.
108.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2000). Security-sector reform and development co-operation: A conceptual framework for enhancing policy coherence. Paris: Author.
109.
Organization of American States. (1992). Statute and regulations of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) and Inter-American Program of Action of Rio de Janeiro. Washington, DC: Author.
110.
Organization of American States. (1996). Anti-drug strategy in the hemisphere. Washington, DC: Author.
111.
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2001). Study on policing in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Vienna: Author.
112.
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2002). Council of Europe and OSCE joint final report on police accountability in Serbia. Vienna: Author.
113.
Pagon, M. (1996). Policing in central and eastern Europe: Comparing firsthand knowledge with experience from the West. Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
114.
Pagon, M. (1998). Policing in central and eastern Europe: Organizational, managerial and human resource perspectives. Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
115.
Pagon, M. (2000). Policing in central and eastern Europe: Ethics, integrity and human rights. Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
116.
Pagon, M. (Ed.). (2002). Policing in central and eastern Europe: Deviance, violence, and victimization. Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
117.
Papsworth, T., & Wihata, S. (2001). Policing Europe: European policing? The challenge of coordination in international policing. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
118.
Perez, T. E. (2000). External governmental mechanisms of police accountability: Three investigative structures. Policing and Society, 10(1), 47-77.
119.
Perito, R. (1998, March). The experience of ICITAP in assisting the institutional development of foreign police forces. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Albuquerque, NM.
120.
Reiner, R. (1992). The politics of the police (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
121.
Sarre, R. (2000). Issues in the governance for 21st century policing and security. Police Practice and Research, 1(2), 169-181.
122.
Schlicht, M. (Ed.). (1998). Policing in a democratic society. Harare, Zimbabwe: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
123.
Shearing, C. (1992). The relationship between public and private policing. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Modern policing (pp. 399-434). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
124.
Shearing, C. (1996). Reinventing policing: Policing as governance. In O. Marenin (Ed.), Policing change, changing police: International Perspectives (pp. 285-307). New York: Garland.
125.
Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2000). Reflections on the governance of security: A normative inquiry. Police Practice and Research, 1(4), 457-476.
126.
Sheptycki, J. W. E. (1996). Law enforcement, justice and democracy in the transnational arena: Reflections on the war on drugs. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 24, 61-75.
127.
Sheptycki, J. W. E. (2000). Policing and human rights: An introduction. Policing and Society, 10, 1-10.
128.
Skolnick, J., & Bayley, D. H. (1988). Community policing: Issues and practices around the world. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates.
129.
Stepan, A., & Costa, A. (2001). Democratization and the police: Crafting in five democratic arenas: Civil society, political society, rule of law, useable state, and economic society. Paper presented at the Conference on Democratic Transition and Consolidation, Madrid, Spain.
130.
Steytler, N. (1990). Policing political opponents: Death squads and cop culture. In D. Hansson &D.V.Z. Smit (Eds.), Towards justice/crime and state control in South Africa (pp. 106-134). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
131.
Stone, C. E., & Ward, H. (2000). Democratic policing: A framework for action. Policing and Society, 10, 11-45.
132.
Tanner, M. S. (2000, October). Will the state bring you back in? Policing and democratization. Comparative Politics, pp. 101-124.
133.
United Nations. (1994). United Nations criminal justice standards for peace-keeping police. New York: Author.
134.
United Nations. (1996). Commissioner’s guidance for democratic policing in the Federation of Bosnia-Herzogovina. New York: Author.
135.
United Nations. (1997). Human rights and law enforcement: A manual on human rights training for the police (Professional Training Series No. 5). New York: Author.
136.
United Nations. (2000). Principles and guidelines for United Nations civilian police. New York: Author.
137.
United Nations. (2002). Justice and security sector reform: A conceptual framework for BCPR. New York: Author.
138.
U.S. Congress. (1996). Democracy, rule of law and police training assistance. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
139.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1992). Foreign aid: Police training and assistance. Washington, DC: Author.
140.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (l993). Foreign assistance: Meeting the training needs of police in new democracies. Washington, DC: Author.
141.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1994). Promoting democracy: Foreign affairs and defense agencies funds and activities, 1991 to 1993. Washington, DC: Author.
142.
U.S. Institute of Peace. (2003). Establishing the rule of law in Iraq (Special report). Washington, DC: Author.
143.
Vera Institute of Justice. (2000). The public accountability of private police: Lessons from New York, Johannesburg, and Mexico City. New York: Author.
144.
Waddington, P. A. J. (1993). Public order policing in Britain. In M. L. Mathews, P. B. Heymann, & A. S. Mathews (Eds.), Policing the conflict in South Africa (pp. 133-160). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
145.
Waddington, P. A. J. (1994). Liberty and order: Public order policing in a capital city. London: UCL Press.
146.
Waddington, P. A. J. (2001). Negotiating and defining “Public Order.”Police Practice and Research, 2(1/2), 3-14.
147.
Walker, N. (1993). The international dimension. In R. Reiner & S. Spencer (Eds.), Accountable policing: Effectiveness, empowerment and equity (pp. 113-171). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
148.
Washington Office on Latin America. (1995). Demilitarizing public order: The international community, police reform and human rights in Central America and Haiti. Washington, DC: Author.
149.
Washington Office on Latin America. (1999-2000). Themes and debates on public security reform: A manual for civil society. Washington, DC: Author.
150.
Weiner, T. (2003, January 16). Mexico City journal: Enter consultant Giuliani, his fee preceding him. The New York Times, p. A4.
151.
Winkler, T. H. (2002). Managing change: The reform and democratic control of the security sector and international order (Occasional paper). Geneva, Switzerland: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
152.
Wong, K.C. (2001). The philosophy of community policing in China. Police Quarterly, 4(2), 186-214.
153.
Ziegler, M., & Neild, R. (2002). From peace to governance: Police reform and the international community. Washington, DC: Washington Office on Latin America.
