While early arrest studies tended to be more qualitative in nature and focus on the nonarrest process, more recent quantitative research has centered on the factors most likely to predict arrest. Using observational data, the current study draws on both lines of inquiry by examining incidents of nonarrest where there was a threshold of evidence that would support an arrest. A multivariate model of nonarrest decision making is presented, and qualitative narratives are analyzed to disentangle actions that police took in lieu of arrest, as well as reasons for alternate actions. The findings indicate that nonarrest behavior is much more prevalent than arrest, irrespective of evidence strength, and that several situational factors are statistically related to nonarrest decisions. The findings also show that alternative arrest actions are not demonstrably different than those noted by descriptive studies some 40 years ago, although the reasons for nonarrest behavior are substantially more varied.
Bayley, D.H., & Bittner, E. (1984). Learning the skills of policing. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47, 35-59.
2.
Berk, S.F., & Loseke, D.R. (1980-1981). “Handling” family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances . Law & Society Review, 15, 317-346.
3.
Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of police in modern society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
4.
Black, D.J. (1971). The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Review, 23, 1087-1111.
5.
Black, D.J. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Brown, M.K. (1981). Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
Davis, K.C. (1969). Discretionary justice. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
8.
Davis, K.C. (1975). Police discretion. St. Paul, MN: West.
9.
Engel, R.S., Sobol, J.J., & Worden, R.E. (2000). Further exploration on the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction effects of suspects' characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17, 235-258.
10.
Finckenauer, J.O. (1976). Some factors in police discretion and decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 29-46.
11.
Goldstein, H. (1993). Confronting the complexity of the police function . In L. E. Ohlin & F. J. Remington (Eds.), Discretion in criminal justice: The tension between individualization and uniformity (pp. 23-71). New York: State University of New York Press.
12.
Goldstein, J. (1960). Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low visibility decisions in the administration of justice. The Yale Law Journal, 69, 543-594.
13.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Gottfredson, D.M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. New York: Plenum Press.
14.
Kadish, M.R., & Kadish, S.H. (1973). Discretion to disobey: A study of lawful departures from legal rules. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
Kelling, G.L., & Moore, M.H. (1996). The evolving strategy of policing. In S. G. Brandl & D. E. Barlow (Eds.), Classics in policing (pp. 71-95). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
16.
Klinger, D.A. (1994). Demeanor or crime? Why “hostile” citizens are more likely to be arrested. Criminology, 32, 475-493.
17.
Klinger, D.A. (1996). More on demeanor and arrest in Dade County. Criminology, 34, 61-82.
18.
LaFave, W.R. (1962a). The police and nonenforcement of the law—Part I. Wisconsin Law Review, January, 104-137.
19.
LaFave, W.R. (1962b). The police and nonenforcement of the law—Part II. Wisconsin Law Review, January, 179-239.
20.
LaFave, W.R. (1965). Arrest: The decision to take a suspect into custody . Boston: Little, Brown and Company .
21.
Liao, T.F. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Sage University Papers: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-045. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Lundman, R.J. (1979). Organizational norms and police discretion: An observational study of police work with traffic violators. Criminology, 17, 159-171.
23.
Lundman, R.J. (1994). Demeanor or crime: The Midwest City police-citizen encounter study. Criminology, 32, 631-656.
24.
Lundman, R.J. (1996). Demeanor and arrest: Additional evidence from previously unpublished data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 306-323.
25.
Lundman, R.J. (1998). City police and drunk driving: Baseline data. Justice Quarterly, 15, 527-546.
26.
Maguire, E.R. (2003). Measuring the performance of law enforcement agencies, part 1. CALEA Update, 83.
Mastrofski, S.D., Parks, R.B., Reiss, A.J., Jr., Worden, R.E., DeJong, C., Snipes, J.B., et al. (1998). Systematic observation of public police: Applying field research methods to policy issues. National Institute of Justice Research Report, NCJ 172859. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
Mastrofski, S.D., Worden, R.E., & Snipes, J.B. (1995). Law enforcement in a time of community policing . Criminology, 33, 539-563.
30.
Novak, K.J., Frank, J., Smith, B.W., & Engel, R.S. (2002). Revisiting the decision to arrest: Comparing beat and community officers. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 70-98.
31.
Ohlin, L.E. (1993). Surveying discretion by criminal justice decision makers. In L. E. Ohlin & F. J. Remington (Eds.), Discretion in criminal justice: The tension between individualization and uniformity (pp. 1-22). New York: State University of New York Press.
32.
Piliavin, I.M., & Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 206-214.
33.
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Riksheim, E.C., & Chermak, S.M. (1993). Causes of police behavior revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 353-382.
35.
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
36.
Schafer, J.A., & Mastrofski, S.D. (2005). Police leniency in traffic enforcement encounters: Exploratory findings from observations and interviews . Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 225-238.
37.
Sherman, L.W. (1980). Causes of police behavior: The current state of quantitative research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 17, 69-100.
38.
Sherman, L.W., & Berk, R.S. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
39.
Smith, D.A. (1984). The organizational context of legal control. Criminology, 22, 19-38.
40.
Smith, D.A. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. In A. J. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 313-341). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Smith, D.A. (1987). Police response to interpersonal violence: Defining the parameters of legal control. Social Forces, 65, 767-782.
42.
Smith, D.A., & Klein, J.R. (1983). Police agency characteristics and arrest decisions . In G. P. Whitaker & C. D. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluating performance of criminal justice agencies (pp. 63-97). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
Smith, D.A., & Klein, J.R. (1984). Police control of interpersonal disputes. Social Problems, 31, 468-481.
44.
Smith, D.A., & Visher, C.A. (1981). Street level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions. Social Problems, 29, 167-177.
45.
Sykes, R.E., & Brent, E.E. (1983). Policing: A social behaviorist perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
46.
Sykes, R.E., Fox, J.C., & Clark, J.P. (1976). A socio-legal theory of police discretion. In A. Niederhoffer & A. S. Blumberg (Eds.), The ambivalent force: Perspective on the police (pp. 171-183). Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
47.
Walker, S. (1992). Origins of the contemporary criminal justice paradigm: The American Bar Foundation survey, 1953-1969. Justice Quarterly , 9, 47-76.
48.
Whitaker, G.P. (1982). What is patrol work?Police Studies , 4, 13-22.
49.
Wilson, J.Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law & order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Worden, R.E. (1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law and Society Review, 23, 667-711.
51.
Worden, R.E., & Shepard, R.L. (1996). Demeanor, crime and police behavior: A reexamination of police services study data. Criminology, 34, 83-105.
