Using a national probability sample of municipal police departments, this study provides the first systematic look at the prevalence, predictors, and content of municipal police websites in the United States. A content analysis revealed that police agencies with websites (42% of all police agencies nationwide in 2008) were more inclined to use websites to “push out” information rather than “pull in” information from the community. The results support the hypothesis that departments with a greater emphasis on community policing (defined by Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics [LEMAS] data) would be more likely to have a website, exhibit greater transparency in the display of data and provide more opportunities for citizen input. Crime rate and population size were also important determinants of website creation and content, respectively. This study concludes that websites are underutilized by both the police and research communities.
Abt Associates. (2000). Police department information systems technology enhancement project (ISTEP). Washington, DC : Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
2.
Barthe, E., & Lateano, T. ( 2006). The state of police department websites. Police Chief, 73(5), 68-74.
3.
Beck, C., & McCue, C. ( 2009). Predictive policing: What can we learn from Wal-Mart and Amazon about fighting crime in a recession?Police Chief , 76(11), 18-24.
4.
Boba, R. ( 1999). Using the Internet to disseminate crime information. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 68(10), 6-9.
5.
Bratton, W.J., & Malinowski, S.W. (2008). Police performance management in practice: Taking COMPSTAT to the next level. Policing, 2, 259-265.
6.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2009). Data online: Crime trends. Retrieved from http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/
7.
Byrne, J.M., & Rebovich, D.J. (2007). New technology of crime, law and social control. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press/Willow Tree Press.
8.
Chan, J.B. ( 1999). Governing police practice: Limits of the new accountability . British Journal of Sociology, 50, 251-270.
9.
Chan, J., Brereton, D., Legosz, M., & Doran, S. ( 2001). E-policing: The impact of information technology on police practices. Brisbane, Australia: Criminal Justice Commission.
10.
Cordner, G.W. ( 1999). Elements of community policing. In L. K. Gaines & G. Cordner (Eds.), Policing perspectives: An anthology (pp. 137-149). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
11.
Crank, J.P., & Langworthy, R. (1992). An institutional perspective of policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 338-363.
12.
Dunworth, T. ( 2000). Criminal justice and the IT revolution. In J. Horney, D. Mackenzie, J. Martin, R. Peterson, & D. P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Criminal justice 2000, Volume 3. Policies, processes and decisions in the Criminal Justice System (pp. 371-426). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
13.
Dykehouse, S.G., & Sigler, R.T. ( 2000). Use of the World Wide Web, hyperlinks and managing the news by criminal justice agencies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 23, 318-338.
14.
Federal Bureau of Investigations. (n.d.). Uniform Crime Reports. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr
15.
Fulla, S., & Welch, E. ( 2002). Framing virtual interactivity between government and citizens: A study on feedback systems in the Chicago police department. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Lectures in Electronic Government, IEEE Computer Society Press, Honolulu.
16.
Garcia, M. ( 2009, August 18). Gov. Pat Quinn signs overhaul of state’s open records law. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-08-18/news/0908180012_1_signs-overhaul-new-law/.
17.
Goodman, M.D. ( 1997). Working the Net: Exploiting technology to increase community involvement and enhance service delivery. Police Chief, 64(8), 45-53.
18.
Greene, J.R. ( 2000). Community policing in America: Changing the nature, structure, and function of the police. In J. Horney, D. Mackenzie, J. Martin, R. Peterson, & D. P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Criminal justice 2000, Volume 3. Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 299-368). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
19.
Griffith, R.E. ( 2005). How criminal justice agencies use the Internet. In A. Pattavina (Ed.), Information technology and the criminal justice system (pp. 59-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
Hickman, M.J., & Reaves, B.A. ( 2001). Local police departments, 1999 (NCJ 186478). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
Hickman, M.J., & Reaves, B.A. ( 2006). Local police departments, 2003 (NCJ 210118). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
22.
Illinois State Police. (n.d.). Annual reports and databases. Retrieved from http://www.isp.state.il.us/crime/ucrhome.cfm
23.
La Porte, T.M. ( 2005). E-government II. Being good and doing well: Organizational openness and government effectiveness on the World Wide Web. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31(3), 23-27.
24.
La Porte, T.M., Demchak, C.C., & de Jong, M. ( 2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34, 411-446.
25.
Manning, P.K. ( 1988). Community policing as a drama of control. In J. R. Greene & S. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality (pp. 27-46). New York, NY: Praeger.
26.
Manning, P.K. ( 2008). The technology of policing: Crime mapping, information technology, and the rationality of crime control. New York, NY: New York University Press.
27.
Mastrofski, S. ( 2006). Community policing: A skeptical view. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Policing innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 44-73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Orlikowski, W.J. ( 1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research , 7(1), 63-92.
29.
Orlikowski, W.J. ( 2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
30.
Pattavina, A. ( 2005). Information technology and the criminal justice system . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
Peterson, M. ( 2005). Intelligence-led policing: The new intelligence architecture (Research Report, NCJ210681). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Reddick, C.G. ( 2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51-64.
34.
Rosenbaum, D.P. ( 1994). The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
Rosenbaum, D.P. ( 2004). Community policing and web-based communication: Addressing the new information imperative. In L. A. Fridell & M. A. Wycoff (Eds.), The future of community policing (pp. 93-113). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
36.
Rosenbaum, D.P. ( 2007). Police innovation post 1980: Assessing effectiveness and equity concerns in the information technology era. Institute for the Prevention of Crime Review, 1, 11-44.
37.
Scarborough, K.E., & Cordner, G. ( 2005). Overview of law enforcement technology. In L. J. Moriarty (Ed.), Criminal justice technology in the 21st century (pp. 97-123). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
38.
Schuck, A.M., & Rosenbaum, D.P. (2008). Building trust and a police-community website: An assessment of the ClearPath planning and community engagement process (Final report). Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
39.
Scott, J.K. ( 2006). "E" the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66, 341-353.
40.
Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. ( 2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
41.
Skogan, W.G. ( 2006). The promise of community policing. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Policing innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 27-43). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Skogan, W., & Hartnett, S. ( 1997). Community policing, Chicago style. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
Skogan, W.G., Rosenbaum, D.P., Hartnett, S.M., DuBois, J., Graziano, L., & Stephens, C. ( 2005). CLEAR and I-CLEAR: A status report on new information technology and its impact on management, the organization and crime-fighting strategies (Final report to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority). Chicago: Center for Research in Law and Justice, University of Illinois at Chicago.
44.
Sulewski, K.E. ( 1997). Fax back response previous question: How has the Internet helped your agency? Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66(1), 23-25.
45.
Tully, E.J., & McKee, S. ( 2000). The present and future use of the internet by law enforcement- Part one. A report for the Major Cities Chiefs, FBI Academy, and the National Executive Institute Associates . NRA Research Projects On-line. Retrieved from http://www.neiassociates.org
46.
Wartell, J., & McEwen, J.T. (2001). Privacy in the information age: A guide for sharing crime maps and spatial data series ( Research Report, NCJ188739). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
47.
Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., & Sechrest, L. ( 1966). Unobtrusive measures: Non-reactive research in the social sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally .
48.
Weisburd, D., & Braga, A.A. ( 2006). Policing innovation: Contrasting perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S.D., Willis, J.J., & Greenspan, R. ( 2006). Changing everything so that everything can remain the same: Compstat and American policing. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Policing innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 284-301). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
