Parametric study on factors influencing the stiffness of honeycomb sandwich panels using impulse excitation technique

Abstract

Metallic thermal protection systems are used to protect the airframe and pay load from aerodynamic and aerothermal heating in hypersonic cruise vehicles that are powered with advanced scramjet engines. Metallic thermal protection systems is a composite structure that contains honeycomb sandwich panels at the top and bottom and a variety of thermal insulating materials placed in between them. Several design factors influence the structural and thermal performance of the honeycomb sandwich panels. Panel bending stiffness is one important structural property that is generally estimated using a destructive 3-point or 4-point bending test. In this study, a numerical model based on the impulse excitation nondestructive evaluation technique has been developed to estimate the effect of various design parameters that affect the bending stiffness of the honeycomb sandwich panels. The results obtained are analyzed using standard statistical procedures. A major advantage of this method lies in evaluating the panel stiffness at the design stage without resorting to actual fabrication of the panels for destructive testing.

Keywords

Sandwich panels stiffness impulse excitation design of experiment Taguchi ANOVA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kerrebrock

. Aircraft engines and gas turbines, 2nd ed. London: The MIT Press, 1992.

Segal

. The scramjet engine – Processes and characteristics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Dorsey JT, Poteet CC, Chen RR, et al. Metallic thermal protection system technology development: Concepts, Requirements and assessment overview. In: 40th aerospace science meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 2002.

Duffa

. Ablative thermal protection systems modeling, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2013.

Blosser

Martin

Daryabeigi

et al.

Reusable metallic thermal protection system development. In: Third European workshop on thermal protection systems, ESTEC: Netherlands, 1998.

Blosser

Chen

Schmidt

et al.

Metallic thermal protection system requirements - Environments and integrated concepts. J Spacecraft Rockets 2004; 41: 183–194.

Blosser ML. Investigation of fundamental modeling and thermal performance issues for a metallic thermal protection system design. In: 40th aerospace science meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 2002.

Goswami

. On the prediction of effective elastic material properties of cellular hexagonal honeycomb core. J Reinf Plast Compos 2006; 25: 393–405.

Murthy

Munirudrappa

Srikanth

et al.

Strength and stiffness optimization studies on honeycomb core sandwich panels. J Reinf Plast Compos 2006; 25: 663–671.

10.

Gryzagoridis

Oliver

Findeis

. On the equivalent flexural rigidity of sandwich composite panels. Insight 2015; 57: 140–143.

11.

Azarmi

Coyle

Mostaghimi

. Evaluation of the flexural rigidity of sandwich structures using experimentally obtained mechanical properties of the constituents. J Therm Spray Technol 2010; 19: 429–438.

12.

Viens MJ and Johnson JJ. Determination of elastic moduli of fiber-resin composite using an impulse excitation technique. NASA Technical Memorandum 104629, February 1996.

13.

Haynes® 263. Product data sheet. Kokomo, IN: Haynes International, 2000.

14.

Chi

Langdon

Nurick

. The influence of core height and face plate thickness on the response of honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to blast loading. Mater Des 2010; 31: 1887–1899.

15.

Roy

. A primer on the Taguchi method, New York: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1990.

16.

Taguchi

Chowdhury

. Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook, New Jersey: John Wiley, 2005.

17.

Ross

. Taguchi Method for quality engineering, Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 1986.

18.

Croccolo

De Agostinis

Fini

et al.

Influence of the engagement ratio on the shear strength of an epoxy adhesive by push-out tests on pin-and-collar joints: Part I: Campaign at room temperature. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016; 67: 69–75.

19.

Bollen B. The innovative impulse excitation technique: A new approach for non-destructive evaluation of material properties. In: Proceedings of ATCOM 2011, Ranchi, India, 5–7 July 2011.

20.

Schwingshackl

Aglietti

Cunningham

. Determination of honeycomb material properties: Existing theories and an alternative dynamic approach. J Aerosp Eng 2006; 19: 177–183.

21.

Nayak SK. Optimization of honeycomb sandwich panel to mitigate the effects of air blast loading. Master Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, USA, 2010.

22.

Aydincak

Kayran

. An approach for the evaluation of effective elastic properties of honeycomb cores by finite element analysis of sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mater 2009; 11: 385–408.

23.

ASTM E1876-15:2015. Standard test method for dynamic Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio by impulse excitation of vibration. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2015.