Re-entrant and honeycomb cellular structures have shown potential for mitigating the effects of extreme loadings such as those imposed by impacts and near-range air blast. However, these cellular geometries can buckle locally and collapse in the immediate vicinity of the loading, which can limit their effectiveness as a protective element. These deficiencies can be addressed by mimicking alternate, naturally occurring, cellular structures, including that of the porcupine quill, which is studied here. The quill possesses several distinct features that effectively counteract buckling and bending, and minimise weight. This study mimics several structural features of the quill to develop a novel cellular design for counteracting air blast loads such as those associated with detonations of high explosives. The performance of the bio-mimetic structure is benchmarked against traditional hexagonal and re-entrant designs, which have been documented in the archival literature. The quill-inspired structure offers more design freedom than the traditional cellular geometries. By iteratively mimicking several of the structural features of the porcupine quill, an optimal balance between local buckling and collapse can be realised, which minimises the reaction on the target below and maximises energy dissipation.
ImbalzanoGNgoTTranP.A numerical study of auxetic composite panels under blast loadings. Compos Struct2015;
135: 339–352.
2.
ImbalzanoGTranPNgoT, et al.
Three-dimensional modelling of auxetic sandwich panels for localised impact resistance. J Sandwich Struct Mater2015;
19: 1–26.
3.
GibsonLJ.The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech1985;
18: 317–328.
4.
SilvaMJGibsonLJ.Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure. Bone1997;
21: 191–199.
5.
BiniFPicaAMarinozziA, et al.
3D diffusion model within the collagen apatite porosity: an insight to the nanostructure of human trabecular bone. Plos One2017;
12: 1–17.
6.
KaramGNGibsonLJ.Biomimicking of animal quills and plant stems: natural cylindrical shells with foam cores. Mater Sci Eng C1994;
2: 113–132.
7.
TorresFGTroncosoOPDiazJ, et al.
Failure analysis of porcupine quills under axial compression reveals their mechanical response during buckling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014;
39: 111–118.
8.
VincentJFVOwersP.Mechanical design of hedgehog spines and porcupine quills. J Zool A1986;
210: 55–75.
9.
AchraiBWagnerHD.The turtle carapace as an optimized multi-scale biological composite armor–A review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
73: 50–67.
10.
LysonTRRubidgeBSScheyerTM, et al.
Fossorial origin of the turtle shell. Curr Biol2016;
26: 1887–1894.
11.
ShelefYBar-OnB.Surface protection in bio-shields via a functional soft skin layer: Lessons from the turtle shell. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
73: 68–75.
12.
FecchioRSSekiYBoddeSG, et al.
Mechanical behavior of prosthesis in Toucan beak (Ramphastos toco). Mater Sci Eng C2010;
30: 460–464.
13.
SekiYMackeyMMeyersMA.Structure and micro-computed tomography-based finite element modeling of Toucan beak. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012;
9: 1–8.
14.
SekiYSchneiderMSMeyersMA.Structure and mechanical behavior of a toucan beak. Acta Materialia2005;
53: 5281–5296.
15.
ChouSFOverfeltRA.Tensile deformation and failure of North American porcupine quills. Mater Sci Eng C2011;
31: 1729–1736.
16.
YangWChaoCMcKittrickJ.Axial compression of a hollow cylinder filled with foam: a study of porcupine quills. Acta Biomater2013;
9: 5297–5304.
17.
KaramGNGibsonLJ.Biomimicking of animal quills and plant stems: natural cylindrical shells with foam cores.Mater Sci Eng C21994; 2: 113–132.
18.
LiewJYSohelKMAKohCG.Impact tests on steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core. Eng Struct2009;
31: 2045–2059.
19.
RemennikovAMKongSY.Numerical simulation and validation of impact response of axially-restrained steel–concrete–steel sandwich panels. Compos Struct2012;
94: 3546–3555.
20.
YanJBLiewJYZhangMH, et al.
Ultimate strength behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with ultra-lightweight cement composite, part 1: experimental and analytical study. Steel Compos Struct2014;
17: 907–927.
21.
YangWMcKittrickJ.Separating the influence of the cortex and foam on the mechanical properties of porcupine quills. Acta Biomater2013;
9: 9065–9074.
22.
QiCRemennikovAPeiLZ, et al.
Impact and close-in blast response of auxetic honeycomb-cored sandwich panels: experimental tests and numerical simulations. Compos Struct2017;
180: 161–178.
23.
ImbalzanoGLinforthSNgoTD, et al.
Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: comparisons and parametric designs. Compos Struct2018;
183: 242–261.
24.
JohnsonGRCookWH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, The Hague, Netherlands, 1983, pp.541–547.
25.
HydeD.ConWep – application of TM 5-855-1. In: Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons. USACE Waterways Experiment Station: Vicksburg, MS, 1992.
26.
KingeryCNBulmashG.Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst.
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD:
Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1984.
27.
US Army Corps of Engineers. In: US Department of Defense (ed) UFC 3-340-02: Structures to Resist the Effects of Explosions. Washington, 2008.
28.
GhazlanANgoTTranP.Three-dimensional voronoi model of a nacre-mimetic composite structure under impulsive loading. Compos Struct2016;
153: 278–296.
29.
GhazlanANgoTTranP. Influence of geometric and material parameters on the behavior of nacreous composites under quasi-static loading. Compos Struct2017; 183: 457–482.
30.
WejrzanowskiTSkibinskiJSzumbarskiJ, et al.
Structure of foams modeled by Laguerre-Voronoi tessellations. Computat Mater Sci2013;
67: 216–221.
31.
TangLShiXZhangL, et al.
Effects of statistics of cell’s size and shape irregularity on mechanical properties of 2D and 3D voronoi foams. Acta Mech2014;
225: 1361–1372.
32.
BenedettiIAliabadiMH.A three-dimensional grain boundary formulation for microstructural modeling of polycrystalline materials. Computat Mater Sci2013;
67: 249–260.
33.
FanZWuYZhaoX, et al.
Simulation of polycrystalline structure with Voronoi diagram in Laguerre geometry based on random closed packing of spheres. Computat Mater Sci2004;
29: 301–308.
34.
TranPNgoTDGhazlanA, et al.
Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings. Compos Part B2017;
108: 210–223.
35.
de BergMCheongOvan KreveldM, et al., Voronoi diagrams, in computational geometry: algorithms and applications.
Berlin Heidelberg:
Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 147–170.
