This article proposes the use of a support as a passive vibration absorber to a composite sandwich structure for vibration suppression of satellite structures. Based on continuous mass distributions, an approximate formulation is presented for conducting vibration (modal, frequency response) analyses of the composite sandwich structure with the support. This formulation is derived by the Ritz method; verified for accuracy and computational efficiency by comparing finite element analyses. Finally, we perform optimization of the composite sandwich structure with passive vibration absorber by the present method. This optimization is conducted to applying satellite structures for maximizing vibration suppression performance in limited mass. The optimization result allows a database to be obtained on the vibration characteristics of composite sandwich structures with passive vibration absorber for applying aerospace applications. Consequently, it is concluded that the approximate formulation is well suited to vibration analyses of composite sandwich structures with passive vibration absorber due to their relative simplicity and computational efficiency.
ThomasPSWileyJL.1995. Spacecraft structures and mechanisms from concept to launch: space technology library. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2.
KimYHKimMJKimPH, et al.
Optimal design of a high-agility satellite with composite solar panels. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2016;
17: 476–490.
3.
ZhuangLMalcolmJC.A review on vibration damping in sandwich composite structures. Int J Acoust Vib2005;
10: 159–169.
4.
PeterSIngridDPatríciaD.Analysis of sandwich structures by the FEM. Am J Mech Eng2017;
5: 243–246.
5.
KumarSSMilwichMDeopuraBL, et al.
Finite element analysis of carbon composite sandwich material with agglomerated cork core. Procedia Eng2011;
10: 478–483.,
6.
WangMNWangBLiuC, et al.
Mechanical respond and failure mode of large size honeycomb sandwiched composites under in-plane shear load. Molecules2019;
24: 1–24.
7.
KarthikRVAshwinRTomS, et al. 2020. Finite element-based damage and failure analysis of honeycomb core sandwich composite structures for space applications. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 forum, Orlando FL, USA, 6–10 January 2020, pp.1–10. Hyatt Regency Orlando, Florida: AIAA Scitech 2020 forum Location.
8.
MahaMALA OkashaEN.Free vibration analysis of sandwich beam structure using finite element approach. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng2015;
12: 34–42.
9.
HakimBSalimBEl MostafaD, et al.
A shell finite element for active-passive vibration control of composite structures with piezoelectric and viscoelastic layers. Mech Adv Mater Struct2008;
15: 208–219.
10.
ChoHKRheeJ.Vibration in a satellite structure with a laminate composite hybrid sandwich panel. Compos Struct2011;
93: 2566–2574.
11.
ShiGTongP.Equivalent transverse shear stiffness of honeycomb cores. Int J Solids Struct1995;
32: 1383–1393.
12.
YuanCBergsmaOKoussiosS, et al.
Optimization of sandwich composites fuselages under flight loads. Appl Compos Mater2012;
19: 47–64.
13.
ZhuXLiuYWangY, et al.
Mechanical behavior of CFRP lattice core sandwich bolted corner joints. Appl Compos Mater2017;
24: 1373–1386.
14.
AshbyMFMedalistREM.The mechanical properties of cellular solids. Metall Trans A1983;
14: 1755–1769.
15.
HassanIWaqasSMuhammadZA, et al.
Finite element analysis of bend test of sandwich structures using strain energy based homogenization method. Adv Mater Sci Eng2017;
2017: 1–10.
16.
Yong-JingWZhi-JiaZXiao-MinX, et al.
Free vibration analysis of composite sandwich panels with hierarchical honeycomb sandwich core. Thin-Walled Struct2019;
145: 1–10.
SerdounSMNHamzaCherif SM.Free vibration analysis of composite and sandwich plates by alternative hierarchical finite element method based on Reddy’s C1 HSDT. J Sandwich Struct Mater2016;
18: 501–528.
19.
ShanshanSBingzhiCZhiS.Equivalent properties of composite sandwich panels with honeycomb–grid hybrid core. J Sandwich Struct Mater. Epub ahead of print 30 July 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1099636218789615.
20.
Guo-DongXTaoZSuC, et al.
Free vibration of composite sandwich beam with graded corrugated lattice core. Compos Struct2019;
229: 111466.
21.
ManishKDSatyajitP.Shear-based vibration control of annular sandwich plates using different piezoelectric fiber composites: a comparative study. J Sandwich Struct Mater. Epub ahead of print 29 march 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1099636219838446.
ReddyJN.2007. Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
24.
LeissaWMohamadSQ.Vibrations of continuous systems.
New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2011.
25.
OltmannJSeemannRKrauseD. Experimental investigation on damping for honeycomb sandwich panels under different support conditions. In: Workshop on aircraft system technologies 2015, Hamburg, Germany, 24–25 February 2015.
26.
BenaBSBenbBAAdarshK, et al.
Damping measurement in composite materials using combined finite element and frequency response method. Int J Eng Sci Invention2013;
2013: 89–97.
27.
SinanMMustafaYMehmetFŞ, et al.
Free vibration analysis of fiber metal laminated straight beam. Open Chem2018;
16: 944–948.
28.
ZechangXQiuhongLWenhaoH, et al.
Vibration characteristics analysis of moderately thick laminated composite plates with arbitrary boundary conditions. Materials2019;
12: 1–26.
29.
ItishreeMShishirKS.Modal analysis of woven fiber composite plates with different boundary conditions.Int J Struct Stab Dyn2015;
15: 1–17.
30.
HollandJH.Adaptation in natural and artificial system.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press, 1975.
31.
GoldbergDE.Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning.
London:
Pearson Education, 2013.
32.
KimYHKimPHKimHY, et al.
Optimal design of a composite lattice rectangular plate for solar panels of a high-agility satellite. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2018;
19: 762–775.
