The vibroacoustic behaviour of aluminium foam sandwich panels in similitude

Abstract

Aluminium Foam Sandwich (AFS) panels are a type of structural configuration in which two aluminium thin layers enclose a core made of foamed aluminium. Both the metallic characteristic of the matrix and the foam porosity lead to a remarkable combination of properties which range from high specific stiffness to thermal and acoustic isolation. However, these characteristics, depending on core properties as foam density, pores morphology, type and size of gas bubbles, are obtained by means of a manufacturing process that is not fully controlled. Thus, in order to reduce the financial and temporal costs of the campaign of experimental tests needed for completely understanding the properties and potentialities of AFS panels, similitude methods can be used so that scaled-down models can be tested in place of the full-scale structure. In this work, the similitude conditions and scaling laws of Alulight® AFS panels with two different boundary conditions (simply supported and free-free) are derived and validated. In particular, two different sets of conditions are derived: the first by expliciting all the geometrical and material properties, the second by combining some parameters into just one with physical meaning, the bending stiffness. The analysis in similitude is addressed towards the prediction of vibroacoustic properties such as natural frequencies, Frequency Response Function (FRF) and radiated acoustic power. Both models in complete and partial similitude are investigated. While the former allow to reconstruct the vibroacoustic characteristics of the prototype, the latter does not. Furthermore, it is proved that it is possible to derive a simplified set of similitude conditions if many parameters are gathered into just one parameter with physical meaning.

Keywords

Similitude sandwich plate aluminium foam mobility radiated acoustic power

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Vinson

JR.

The behavior of sandwich structures of isotropic and composite materials. Lancaster: Taylor and Francis Technomic Publishing Co, 1999.

Zenkert

An introduction to sandwich construction. West Midlands: EMAS Publications, 1995.

D'Alessandro

Petrone

Franco

, et al. A review of the vibroacoustics of sandwich panels: models and experiments. J Sandw Struct Mater 2013; 15: 541–582.

Ninh

Tien

Hoang

VNV.

Analyses of nonlinear dynamics of imperfect nanocomposite circular cylindrical shells with swirling annular and internal fluid flow using higher order shear deformation shell theory. Eng Struct 2019; 198: 109502.

Ninh

Tien

Hoang

VNV

Bich

DH.

Vibration of cylindrical shells made of three layers w-cu composite containing heavy water using Flügge-Lur’e-Bryrne theory. Thin-Wall Struct 2020; 146: 106414.

Bauhart

Aluminium foams for lighter vehicles. Int J Veh Des 2005; 37: 114–125.

Schwingel

Seeliger

Vecchionacci

, et al. Aluminium foam sandwich structures for space applications. Acta Astronaut 2007; 61: 326–330.

De Rosa

Franco

Exact and numerical responses of a plate under a turbulent boundary layer excitation. J Fluids Struct 2008; 24: 212–230.

Holmes

Sliter

Scale modeling of vehicle crashes—techniques, applicability, and accuracy; cost effectiveness. Technical Report SAE Paper No. 740586, 1974.

10.

Harris

Sabnis

GM.

Structural modeling and experimental techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1999.

11.

Casaburo

Petrone

Franco

, et al. A review of similitude methods for structural engineering. Appl Mech Rev 2019; 71: 030802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043787

12.

Goodier

Thomson

WT.

Applicability of similarity principles to structural models. Technical Report NACA Technical Report CR-4068. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1944.

13.

Simitses

Rezaeepazhand

Structural similitude for laminated structures. Compos Eng 1993; 3: 751–765.

14.

Rezaeepazhand

Yazdi

AA.

Similitude requirements and scaling laws for flutter prediction of angle-ply composite plates. Compos Part B 2011; 42: 51–56.

15.

Yazdi

Rezaeepazhand

Accuracy of scale models for flutter prediction of cross-ply laminated plates. J Reinf Plast Compos 2011; 30: 45–52.

16.

Singhatanadgid

Ungbhakorn

Scaling laws for vibration response of anti-symmetrically laminated plates. Struct Eng Mech 2002; 14: 345–320.

17.

Singhatanadgid

Na Songkhla

Experimental investigation into the use of scaling laws for predicting vibration responses of rectangular thin plates. J Sound Vib 2008; 311: 314–327.

18.

Kasivitamnuay

Singhatanadgid

Application of an energy theorem to derive a scaling law for structural behaviors. Sci Technol Asia 2005; 10: 33–40.

19.

De Rosa

Franco

Mace

BR.

The asymptotic scaled modal analysis for the response of a 2-plate assembly. Volterra (PI): XVIII AIDAA National Congress, 2005.

20.

De Rosa

Franco

On the use of the asymptotic scaled modal analysis for the time-harmonic structural analysis and for the prediction of coupling loss factors for similar systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 2010; 24: 455–480.

21.

De Rosa

Franco

A scaling procedure for the response of an isolated system with high modal overlap factor. Mech Syst Signal Process 2008; 22: 1549–1565.

22.

De Rosa

Franco

, et al. A similitude for structural acoustic enclosures. Mech Syst Signal Process 2012; 30: 330–342.

23.

De Rosa

Franco

Meruane

Similitudes for structural response of flexural plates. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2016; 230: 174–188.

24.

Meruane

De Rosa

Franco

Numerical and experimental results for the frequency response of plates in similitude. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2016; 230: 3212–3221.

25.

Franco

Robin

Ciappi

, et al. Similitude laws for the structural response of flat plates under a turbulent boundary layer excitation. Mech Syst Signal Process 2019; 129: 590–613.

26.

Luo

Wang

Zhu

, et al. The dynamic similitude design method of thin walled structures and experimental validation. Shock Vibr 2016; 2016: 1–11.

27.

Luo

Wang

Zhu

, et al. The similitude design method of thin-walled annular plates and determination of structural size intervals. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2016; 230: 2158–2168.

28.

Adams

Bös

Slomski

, et al. Scaling laws obtained from a sensitivity analysis and applied to thin vibrating structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 2018; 110: 590–610.

29.

Frostig

Simitses

GJ.

Similitude of sandwich panels with a ‘soft’ core in buckling. Compos Part B 2004; 35: 599–608.

30.

Yang

Hassan

Cantwell

, et al. Scaling effects in the low velocity impact response of sandwich structures. Compos Struct 2013; 99: 97–104.

31.

Luo

Zhao

Zhu

, et al. Determination method of the size structure interval of dynamically similar models for predicting vibration characteristics of the isotropic sandwich plates. J Vibroeng 2014; 16: 608–622.

32.

D'Alessandro

Petrone

De Rosa

, et al. Modelling of aluminium foam sandwich panels. Smart Struct Syst 2014; 13: 615–636.

33.

Petrone

D trone FromO

Franco

, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations on the acoustic power radiated by aluminium foam sandwich panels. Compos Struct 2014; 118: 170–177.

34.

Powell

Stephens

DG.

Vibrational characteristics of sandwich panels in a reduced-pressure environment. Technical Report NASA TN D-3549, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Langley Station, Hampton (VA), USA, 1966.

35.

Cremer

Heckl

Bat

Structural vibrations and sound radiation at audio frequencies. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2005.

36.

Fahy

Gardonio

Sound and structural vibration—radiation, transmission and response. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2007.

37.

Robin

Chazot

Boulandet

, et al. A plane and thin panel with representative simply supported boundary conditions for laboratory vibroacoustic tests. Acta Acust Unit With Acust 2016; 102: 170–182.