Does Working Hard in School Explain Performance Differences between Girls and Boys? A Questionnaire-based Study Comparing Pakistani Students with Majority Group Students in the City of Oslo
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2013
Does Working Hard in School Explain Performance Differences between Girls and Boys? A Questionnaire-based Study Comparing Pakistani Students with Majority Group Students in the City of Oslo
This study examines how working hard in school contributes to explaining gender differences in academic achievement between students of Norwegian (n = 8,002) and Pakistani (n = 862) descent in secondary schools in Oslo, Norway. Path analyses show that reported school effort explains a significant part of the gender differences in school achievement for the Pakistani sample, but not as much of the gender variation in the ethnic Norwegian sample. Working hard in school is characteristic for the Pakistani sample, especially the girls. Explanations that may account for the differences in the two samples are discussed, with particular emphasis on cultural distinctions in such areas as being native within a culture, expectations and pressure from home, social control and self-reporting.
ArnotMadeleineMac an GhaillMairtin (2006) ‘(Re)contextualizing Gender Studies in Education: Schooling in Late Modernity’, in ArnotMadeleineMac an GhaillMairtin (eds) The Routledge Falmer Reader in Gender and Education, pp. 1–14. New York and London: Routledge.
2.
BakkenAnders (2003) Minoritetsspråklig ungdom i skolen. Reproduksjon av ulikhet eller sosial mobilitet?(Minority Language Students in Norwegian Secondary Schools. Reproduction of Inequality or Social Mobility?). NOVA Report 15/03. Oslo: NOVA.
3.
BakkenAnders (2008) ‘Er kjønnsforskjeller i skoleprestasjoner avhengig av klassebakgrunn og minoritetsstatus?’ (‘Are Gender Differences in Achievement Dependent upon Class Background and Minority Status?’), Tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning8(1): 85–93.
4.
BakkenAnders (2009) Ulikhet på tvers. Har foreldres utdanning, kjønn og minoritetsstatus like stor betydning for elevers karakterer på alle skoler?(Differences Across Schools: Are Parents’ Education, Gender, and Minority Status Equally Important Across Norwegian Schools?). NOVA report 8/09. Oslo: NOVA.
5.
BakkenAndersBorgElinHegnaKristinnBacke-HansenElisabeth (2008) Er det skolens skyld? En kunnskapsoversikt om skolens bidrag til kjønnsforskjeller i skoleprestasjoner(Is School to Blame? A Review of How the School System Contribution to Gender Differences in Achievement). NOVA report 4/08. Oslo: NOVA.
6.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A. (1986) ‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–82.
7.
BasitTehmina N. (1997) ‘“I Want More Freedom, but Not Too Much”: British Muslim Girls and the Dynamism of Family Values’, Gender and Education9(4): 425–40.
8.
Bjerrum NielsenHarriet (2000) ‘Inn i klasserommet’ (‘Inside the Classroom’), in ImsenGunn (ed.) Kjønn og likestilling i grunnskolen(Gender and Equal Opportunities in Primary School), pp. 51–69. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
9.
BjörnssonMats (2005) Kön och skolfremgång. Tolkningar och perspektiv(Gender and School Success. Interpretations and Perspective). Stockholm: Skolverket.
10.
BollenKenneth A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
11.
BollenKenneth A.BarbKenney H. (1981) ‘Pearson’s R and Coarseley Categorized Measures’, American Sociological Review46(2): 232–39.
12.
CarbonaroWilliam (2005) ‘Students’ Effort and Academic Achievement’, Sociology of Education78(1): 27–49.
ConnellRaewyn (2009) Short Introductions. Gender. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
15.
ConnollyPaul (2006) ‘The Effects of Social Class and Ethnicity on Gender Differences in GCSE Attainment: A Secondary Analysis of the Youth Cohort Study of England and Wales 1997–2001’, British Educational Research Journal32(1): 3–21.
16.
CooperHarrisRobinsonJorgianne CiveyPatallErika A. (2006) ‘Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research’, Review of Educational Research76(1): 1–62.
17.
CrockettLisa J.SchulenbergJohn E.PetersenAnne C. (1987) ‘Congruence between Objective and Self-reported Data in a Sample of Young Adolecents’, Journal of Adolecent Research2(4): 383–92.
18.
DemieFeyisa (2001) ‘Ethnic and Gender Differences in Educational Achievement and Implications for School Improvement Strategies’, Educational Research43(1): 91–106.
19.
DornbuschStandford M.RitterPhilip L.Mont-ReynaudRandyChenZeng-yin (1990) ‘Family Decision making and Academic Performance in a Diverse High School Population’, Journal of Adolecent Research5(2): 143–60.
20.
EndersCraig K.BandalosDeborah L. (2001) ‘The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models’, Structural Equation Modelin8(3): 430–57.
21.
EpsteinDebbieElwoodJannetteHayValerieMawJanet (2009) Failing Boys?New York: Open University Press.
22.
FekjærSilje (2006) ‘Utdanning hos annengenerasjon etniske minoriteter i Norge’ (‘Education among Second Generation Etnic Minorities in Norway’), Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning47(1): 57–93.
23.
FrancisBecky (1999) ‘Lads, Lasses and (New) Labour: 14-16-Year-Old Students’ Responses to the “Laddish Behaviour and Boys’ Underachievement” Debate’, British Journal of Sociology of Education20(3): 355–71.
24.
FrancisBecky (2000) Boys, Girls, and Achievement: Addressing the Classroom Issues. London: Routledge/Falmer.
25.
FrancisBeckySkeltonChristine (2008) Reassessing Gender and Achievement. London and New York: Routledge.
26.
FredericksonNorahPetridesK.V. (2008) ‘Ethnic, Gender, and Socio-economic Group Differences in Academic Performance and Secondary School Selection: A Longitudinal Analysis’, Learning and Individual Differences18(2): 144–51.
27.
FreudenthalerHarald H.SpinathBirgitNeubauerAljoscha C. (2008) ‘Predicting School Achievement in Boys and Girls’, European Journal of Personality22(3): 231–45.
28.
FuglerudØivindEngebrigtsenAda (2009) Kultur og Generasjon. Tilpasningsprosesser blant somaliere og tamiler i Norge(Culture and Generation. Adjustment Processes among Solmalis and Tamils in Norway). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
29.
GorardStephenReesGarethSalisburyJane (2001) ‘Investigating the Patterns of Differential Attainment of Boys and Girls at School’, British Educational Research Journal27(2): 125–39.
30.
HarrisSusanNixonJonRudduckJean (1993) ‘School Work, Homework and Gender’, Gender and Education5(1): 3–15.
31.
HeggenKåre (2002) ‘Utkantjentene sin stille revolusjon’ (’Rural Girls’ Silent Revolution’), Tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning2(2): 3–20.
32.
HodgettsKathrine (2008) ‘Underperformance or “Getting it Right”? Constructions of Gender and Achievement in the Australian Inquiry into Boys’ Education’, British Journal of Sociology of Education29(5): 465–77.
33.
JacksonCarolyn (2002) ‘“Laddishness” as a Self-Worth Protection Strategy’, Gender and Education14(1): 37–51.
34.
JacksonCarolyn (2003) ‘Motives for “Laddishness” at School: Fear of Failure and Fear of the “Feminine”’, British Educational Research Journal29(4): 583–98.
35.
JacksonCarolyn (2006) ‘“Wild” Girls? An Exploration of “Ladette” Cultures in Secondary Schools’, Gender and Education18(4): 339–60.
36.
JacksonCarolynDempsterSteven (2009) ‘“I Sat Back on My Computer- with a Bottle of Whisky Next to Me”: Constructing “Cool” Masculinity through “Effortless” Achievement in Secondary and Higher Education’, Journal of Gender Studies18(4): 341–56.
37.
JacksonCarolynTinklerPenny (2007) ‘“Ladettes” and “Modern Girls”: “Troublesome” Young Femininities’, Sociological Review55(2): 251–72.
38.
KaoGraceThompsonJennifer S. (2003) ‘Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment’, Annual Review of Sociology29(1): 417–42.
39.
Kenney-BensonGwen A.PomerantzEva M.RyanAllison M.PatrickHelen (2006) ‘Sex Differences in Math Performance: The Role of Children’s Approach to Schoolwork’, Developmental Psychology42(1): 11–26.
40.
KjærnsliMaritLieSveinOlsenRolf VegardRoeAstrid (2007) Tid for tunge løft: Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, lesing og matematikk i PISA 2006(Norwegian Students’ Qualifications in Natural Science, Reading and Mathematics in PISA 2006). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
41.
KrangeOlveBakkenAnders (1998) ‘Innvandrerungdoms skoleprestasjoner. Tradisjonelle klasseskiller eller nye skillelinjer?’ (‘Explaining Minority Language Students’ Achievement’), Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning39(3): 381–410.
42.
LaugloJon (1996) Motbakke, men mer driv? Innvandrerungdom i norsk skole(Working Harder to Make the Grade? Minority Language Students in Norwegian Schools). Report 6/98. Oslo: Ungforsk.
43.
LaugloJon (1999) ‘Working Harder to Make the Grade: Immigrant Youth in Norwegian Schools’, Journal of Youth Studies2(1): 77–100.
44.
LaugloJon (2000) ‘Social Capital Trumping Class and Cultural Capital? Engagement with School among Immigrant Youth’, in BaronJohn Field StephenSchullerTom (eds) Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, pp. 143–67. London: Oxford University Press.
45.
LaugloJon (2004) ‘Innvandrerungdommers anspennelse på skolen’ (‘Immigrants’ Working Harder in School’), in AasenPetterForosPer BjørnKjølPer (eds) Pedagogikk og politikk. Festskrift til Alfred Oftedal Telhaug(Pedagogy amd Politics. To Alfred Oftedal Telhaug), pp. 346–70. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske Forlag.
46.
LaugloJon (2010) Unge fra innvandrerfamilier og sosial kapital for utdanning(Young Immigrants and Social Capital for Education). Oslo: Forskningsrådet.
47.
LyngSelma Therese (2009) ‘Is There More to “Antischoolishness” than Masculinity? On Multiple Student Styles, Gender, and Educational Self-exclusion in Secondary School’, Men and Masculinities11(4): 462–87.
48.
LøddingBerit (2003) Frafall blant minoritetsspråklige. Om frafall og norsk som andrespråk blant minoritetsspråklige elever i overgangen fra 10. klasse til videregående opplæring(Drop-out among Minority Language Students. About Drop-out and Norwegian as Second Language among Minority Language Students in the Transition from 10th Grade to Upper Secondary School). NIFU report 29/03. Oslo: NIFU.
49.
LøddingBerit (2009) ‘Minoritetsspråklige i videregående opplæring’ (‘Minority Language Students in Upper Secondary Education’), in MarkussenEifred (ed.) Videregående opplæring for nesten alle[Upper Secondary Education for Almost All], pp. 143–61. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske Forlag.
50.
MacKinnonDavid P.WarsiGhulamDwyerJames H. (1995) ‘A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures’, Multivariate Behavioural Research30(1): 41–62.
51.
MarksGary N. (2008) ‘Accounting for the Gender Gaps in Student Performance in Reading and Mathematics: Evidence from 31 Countries’, Oxford Review of Education34(1): 89–109.
52.
MikkelsenRolfFjeldstadDagLaugloJon (2011) Morgendagens samfunnsborgere. Norske ungdomsskoleelevers prestasjoner og svar på spørsmål i den internasjonale demokratiundersøkelsen ICCS(Tomorrows Citizens. Norwegian Lower Secondary School Students’ Achievement and Answers on Questions on the International Democracy Survey ICCS). Report 02/2011. Oslo: Department of Teacher Education and School Research (ILS).
53.
MoenBjørg (2009) Tilhøringhetens balanse. Norsk-Pakistanske kvinners hverdagsliv i transnasjonale familier(Norwegian-Pakistani Women’s Everyday Experiences in Transnational Families). Nova Report 13/09. Oslo: NOVA.
54.
MorganStephen L. (2005) On the Edge of Commitment: Educational Attainment and Race in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
MuthénLinda K.MuthénBengt O. (1998–2010) Mplus User’s Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
ØiaTormod (2007) ‘Flinke gutter og jenter i utakt’ (‘Clever Boys and Girls Out of Step’), in StrandbuÅseTormodØia (eds) Ung i Norge. Skole, fritid og ungdomskultur(Young in Norway. School, Leisure and Youth Culture), pp. 62–83. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
58.
OpheimVibekeStørenLiv Anne (2001) Innvandrerungdom og majoritetsungdom gjennom videregående til høyere utdanning. Utdanningsforløp, utdanningsaspirasjoner og realiserte utdanningsvalg(Immigrant and Majority Youths Transition from Upper Secondary Education to Higher Education. Educational Gradient, Aspirations and Choices). NIFU Report 7/01. Oslo: NIFU.
59.
ØzerkKamil Z. (2007) Tospråklige overgangsmodeller og tosidige modeller(Bilingual Transitional Models and Two Sided Models). Vallset: Oplandske Bokforlag.
60.
PettersenSilje Vatne (2009) Innvandrere i norske kommuner. Demografi, levekår og deltagelse i arbeidsstyrken(Immigrants in Norwegian Municipalities. Demography, Living Conditions and Participation in the Work Force). Report 36/09. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
61.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin (1993) ‘The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants among Post-1965 Immigrant Youth’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences530(1): 74–96.
62.
SalisburyJaneReesGarethGorardStephen (1999) ‘Accounting for the Differential Attainment of Boys and Girls at School’, School Leadership & Management19(4): 403–26.
63.
SatorraAlbertBentlerPeter M. (2001) ‘A Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis’, Psychometrika66(4): 507–14.
64.
SchaferJoseph L.GrahamJohn W. (2002) ‘Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art’, Psychological Methods7(2): 147–77.
65.
SkeltonChristine (2002) ‘The “Feminisation of Schooling” or “Re-masculinising” Primary Education?’International Studies in Sociology of Education12(1): 77–96.
66.
SobelMichael E. (1982) ‘Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models’, in LeinhartSamuel (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1982, pp. 290–312. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
67.
Statistics Norway (2009) ‘Innvandrere og norskfødte med innvandrerforeldre. 1.januar 2009’(‘Immigrants and Norwegian Born with Immigrant Parents. 1 January 2009’), URL (consultedApril, 2010): http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/01/10/innvbef/
68.
SteffensenKjartanZiadeSalah E. (2009) Skoleresultater 2008. En kartlegging av karakterer fra grunnskolen og videregående skoler i Norge(School Results 2008. Mapping Marks from Compulsory to Upper Secondary School in Norway). Oslo, Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
69.
Stærkebye LeirvikMariann (2010) ‘“For mors skyld”. Utdanning, takknemlighet og status blant unge med pakistansk og indisk bakgrunn’ (‘For Our Mother’. Education, Gratitude and Status among Young Norwegian-Pakistanis and Norwegian-Indians), Tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning10(1): 23–47.
70.
StørenLiv AnneHellandHåvardGrøgaardJens B. (2007) Og hvem stod igjen-? Sluttrapport fra prosjektet Gjennomstrømning i videregående opplæring blant elever som startet i videregående opplæring i årene 1999–2001(Final Report from the Project Completing Secondary Education for Students Who Started Upper Secondary School in 1999–2001). NIFU STEP Report 14/07. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
71.
TrautweinUlrich (2007) ‘The Homework–Achievement Relation Reconsidered: Differentiating Homework Time, Homework Frequency, and Homework Effort’, Learning and Instruction17(3): 372–88.
72.
TrautweinUlrichLüdtkeOliver (2007) ‘“Students” Self-reported Effort and Time on Homework in Six School Subjects: Between-student Differences and Within-student Variation’, Journal of Educational Psychology99(2): 432–44.
73.
TrautweinUlrichLüdtkeOliverKartensClaudiaKöllerOlaf (2006) ‘Effort on Homework in Grades 5–9: Development, Motivational Antecedents, and the Association with Effort on Classwork’, Child Development77(4): 1094–111.
74.
Van de gaerEvaPustjensHeidiVan DammeJanDe MunterAgnes (2006) ‘Tracking and the Effects of School-related Attitudes on the Language Achievement of Boys and Girls’, British Journal of Sociology of Education27(3): 293–309.
75.
Van de gaerEvaPustjensHeidiVan DammeJanDe MunterAgnes (2007) ‘Impact of Attitudes of Peers on Language Achievement: Gender Differences’, Journal of Educational Research101(2): 78–93.
76.
WarringtonMollyYoungerMikeWilliamsJacquetta (2000) ‘Student Attitudes, Image and the Gender Gap’, British Educational Research Journal26(3): 393–407.
77.
WillisPaul E. (1977) Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
