Young adults in Norway mostly choose cohabitation as their first co-residential union and the age of first union formation is comparatively low. However, dissolution rates are higher in Norway than in most other parts of Europe, potentially leading to unstable relationship careers in young adulthood. Using recent survey data from Norway on men and women born 1927–73 (N = 9, 723), we analyze the prevalence and correlates of the number of co-residential unions experienced by the age of 35. We find that the number of co-residential relationships has increased across cohorts, but this development has slowed down among the youngest cohorts. The type of the first union plays a crucial role, and young adults who did not marry their first cohabiting partner have a higher likelihood of experiencing several co-residential unions than those who married directly or via cohabitation.
AassveArnsteinBettiGiannaMazzucoStefanoMencariniLetizia (2007) ‘Marital Disruption and Economic Well-being: A Comparative Analysis’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)170(3): 781–99.
2.
AnderssonGunnarNoackTuridSeierstadAneWeedon-FekjærHarald (2006) ‘The Demographics of Same-Sex Marriages in Norway and Sweden’, Demography43(1): 79–98.
3.
BeckUlrich (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications.
4.
BillariFrancesco C.LiefbroerAart C. (2010) ‘Towards a New Pattern of Transition to Adulthood?’, Advances in Life Course Research15(1): 59–75.
5.
BinstockGeorginaThorntonArland (2003) ‘Separations, Reconciliations, and Living Apart in Cohabiting and Marital Unions’, Journal of Marriage and Family65(2): 432–43.
6.
BuchmannMarlis C.KriesiIrene (2011) ‘Transition to Adulthood in Europe’, Annual Review of Sociology37: 481–503.
7.
BukodiErzsébet (2012) ‘Serial Cohabitation among Men in Britain: Does Work History Matter?’, European Journal of Population, 28(4): 441–66.
8.
CherlinAndrew J. (2009) The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family Today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
9.
CorijnMartineKlijzingErik (2001) Transition to Adulthood in Europe. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
DykstraPearl A.PoortmanAnne-Rigt (2010) ‘Economic Resources and Remaining Single: Trends over Time’, European Sociological Review26(3): 277–90.
11.
GiddensAnthony (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
JensenAn-MargrittClausenSten-Erik (2003) ‘Children and Family Dissolution in Norway. The Impact of Consensual Unions’, Childhood10(1): 65–81.
13.
JalovaaraMarika (2002) ‘Socioeconomic Differentials in Divorce Risk by Duration of Marriage’, Demographic Research7(16): 537–64.
14.
KohlerHans-PeterBehrmannJere R.SkyttheAxel (2005) ‘Partner + Children = Happiness? The Effects of Partnerships and Fertility on Well-being’, Population and Development Review31(3): 407–45.
15.
KohliMartin (2007) ‘The Institutionalization of the Life Coures: Looking Back to Look Ahead’, Research in Human Development4(3-4): 253–71.
16.
KuluHillBoylePaul J. (2010) ‘Premarital Cohabitation and Divorce: Support for the “Trial Marriage” Theory?’, Demographic Research23(31): 879–904.
17.
LappegårdTrudeVeenstraMarijke (2010) Life-Course, Generation and Gender. LOGG 2007. Field Report of the Norwegian Generations and Gender Survey. Documents, Oslo: Statistics Norway.
18.
LappegårdTrudeRønsenMarit (2013) ‘Socioeconomic Differentials in Multipartnered Fertility among Norwegian Men’, Demography40(3): 1135–53.
19.
LesthaegheRon J. (2010) ‘The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition’, Population and Development Review36(2): 211–51.
20.
LichterDaniel T.QianZhenchao (2008) ‘Serial Cohabitation and the Marital Life Course’, Journal of Marriage and Family70(4): 861–78.
21.
LichterDaniel T.TurnerRichard N.SasslerSharon (2010) ‘National Estimates of the Rise in Serial Cohabitation’, Social Science Research39: 754–65.
22.
LiefbroerAart C.DourleijnEdith (2006) ‘Unmarried Cohabitation and Union Stability: Testing the Role of Diffusion Using Data From 16 European Countries’, Demography43(2): 203–21.
23.
LyngstadTorkild Hovde (2006) ‘Why do Couples with Highly Educated Parents have Higher Divorce Rates?’, European Sociological Review22(1): 49–60.
24.
LyngstadTorkild HovdeJalovaaraMarika (2010) ‘A Review of the Antecedents of Union Dissolution’, Demographic Research23(10): 257–92.
25.
MastekaasaArne (2006) ‘Is Marriage/Cohabitation Beneficial for Young People? Some Evidence on Psychological Distressamong Norwegian College Students’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology16(2): 149–65.
26.
ModellJohnFurstenbergFrank F.HershbergTheodore (1976) ‘Social Change and Transition to Adulthood in Historical Perspective’, Journal of Family History1(1): 7–32.
27.
MorenoAlmudena (2012) ‘The Transition to Adulthood in Spain in a Comparative Perspective’, Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research20(1): 19–48.
28.
Ní BhrolcháinMáireSigle-RushtonWendy (2005) ‘Partner Supply in Britain and the US. Estimates and Gender Contrasts’, Population60(1–2): 37–64.
29.
NoackTuridSeierstadAne (2003) ‘Utviklingen i samliv: Heller jeg enn vi?’ [The Development of Unions: Me Rather than Us]’, Samfunnsspeilet17(3): 19–25.
30.
OinonenEriikka (2003) ‘Extended Present, Faltering Future. Family Formation in the Process of Attaining Adult Status in Finland and Spain’, Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research11(2): 121–40.
31.
Perelli-HarrisBriennaSánchez GassenNora (2012) ‘How Similar Are Cohabitation and Marriage? Legal Approaches to Cohabitation across Western Europe’, Population and Development Review38(3): 435–67.
32.
PetersEls (1996) ‘(Dis)continuity Between the Generations? A Comparison of Mothers and Daughters’, Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research4(30): 30–46.
33.
PoortmanAnne-Rigt (2007) ‘The First Cut is the Deepest? The Role of the Relationship Career for Union Formation’, European Sociological Review23(5): 585–98.
34.
PoortmanAnne-RigtLyngstadTorkild Hovde (2007) ‘Dissolution Risks in First and Higher Order Marital and Cohabiting Unions’, Social Science Research36(4): 143–146.
35.
RønsenMarit (2004) ‘Fertility and Family Policy in Norway: A Refelection on Trends and Possible Connections’, Demographic Research10(10): 265–86.
36.
SandliHans Christian (2008) ‘To må man være. Om Ungdoms Boligetablering på 1990-tallet’ [It Takes Two. The Transition to Home Ownership among Young People in the 1990s]’, NOVA Rapport 09/2008, NOVA–Norwegian Social Research: Oslo.
37.
ShanahanMichael J (2000) ‘Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and Mechanisms in Life Course Perspective’, Annual Review of Sociology26: 667–92.
SteeleFionaKallisConstantinosJoshiHeather (2006) ‘The Formation and Outcomes of Cohabiting and Marital Partnerships in Early Adulthood: The Role of Previous Partnership Experience’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society169(4): 757–79.
40.
SyltevikLiv Johanne (2010) ‘Sense and Sensibility: Cohabitation in ‘Cohabitation Land’, The Sociological Review58(3): 444–62.
41.
TeachmanJay (2003) ‘Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution among Women’, Journal of Marriage and Family65(2): 444–55.
42.
TexmonInger (1999) ‘Samliv i Norge mot Slutten av 1900-tallet. En Beskrivelse av Endringer og Mangfold. [Co-residential Unions in Norway at the Dawn of the 1990s. A Description of Changes and Diversities]’, in Norges Offentlige Utredninger, No. 1999/25, Samboerne og samfunnet [Cohabitors and the Society], pp. 251–85. Oslo: Statens Forvaltningstjeneste.
43.
VikatAndresSpéderZsoltPailhéArianePinnelliAntonellaSolazAnneBeetsGijsBillariFrancesco C.BühlerChristophDésesquellesAlineFokkemaTinekeHoemJan M.MacDonaldAlphonseNeyerGerda (2007) ‘Generations and Gender Survey (GGS). Towards a Better Understanding of Relationships and Processes in the Life Course’, Demographic Research17(14): 389–400.
44.
WaltherAndreas (2006) ‘Regimes of Youth Transitions. Choice, Flexibility and Security in Young People’s Experiences across Different European Contexts’, Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research14(2): 119–39.
45.
WiikKenneth AarskaugDommermuthLars (2014) ‘Who Remains Unpartnered by Mid-Life in Norway? Differentials by Gender and Education’, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, XLV(3), 405–424.
46.
WiikKenneth AarskaugDommermuthLars (2011) ‘Type, Number, and Incidence: Recent Patterns and Differentials in Relationship Careers in Norway’, Discussion Papers No. 650, Statistics Norway, Oslo.
47.
WiikKenneth AarskaugKeizerRenskeLappegårdTrude (2012) ‘Relationship Quality in Marital and Cohabiting Unions Across Europe’, Journal of Marriage and Family74(3): 389–98.
48.
ZimmermannAnke C.EasterlinRichard A. (2006) ‘Happily ever after? Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Happiness in Germany’, Population and Development Review32(2): 511–28.
