Between Mobility and Belonging: The Meanings of Locality among Youth in Lapland in the Transition to Adulthood

Abstract

The article analyses mobility and belonging to a place among young people living in rural areas in Finnish Lapland. Our focus is on the meanings of locality when young people make decisions concerning education, work and their living environment. The data consist of 24 interviews of persons in the transition stage to adulthood and in need of support in finding educational or training opportunities. The article highlights the diversity of young people’s aspirations as regards leaving, staying in or returning to their home region. We challenge the cultural discourse urging young people to move to growth centres from sparsely populated areas. Locality was found to play an important role in their lives and transitions. The key factors identified in the decisions of young people were embeddedness in one’s home region and local, social relations and the prospects of meaningful life choices in either the rural or urban context.

Keywords

Youth transition to adulthood agency rural area locality migration mobility belonging

References

Ansell

(2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190–209.

Augé

(2012). Thinking mobility. Transfers, 2(1), 5–9.

Bamberg

Zielke

(2007). From dialogical practices to polyphonic thought? Developmental inquiry and where to look for it? International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2(1), 223–242.

Bamming

(2017). Työpajatoiminta 2016. Valtakunnallisen työpajakyselyn tulokset [Workshop activities 2016. The Results of the National Workshop Inquiry]. Publications of the Regional State Administrative Agencies. Retrieved from https://www.avi.fi/documents/10191/8064383/Julkaisu-30-LSSAVI.pdf/accessed

Barry

(2005). The inclusive illusion of youth transitions. In Barry

(Ed.), Youth policy and social inclusion: Critical debates with young people (pp. 97–112). London: Routledge.

Clapham

Mackie

Orford

Thomas

Buckley

(2014). The housing pathways of young people in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 46(8), 2016–2031.

Coulton

C. J.

(1995). Potential and problems in developing community-level indicators of children’s well-being. In Indicators of children’s well-being: Conference Papers—Volume III: Cross-cutting Issues; Population, Family, and Neighborhood; Social Development and Problem Behaviors (pp. 15–33). Institute for Research on Poverty Special Report. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved from https://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/sr/pdfs/sr60c.pdf./

Cuervo

(2015). Rethinking social exclusion and young people in rural places: Toward a spatial and relational approach in youth and education studies. In Skelton

Worth

Dwyer

(Eds.), Identities and subjectivities, geographies of children and young people (pp. 333–350). Heidelberg: Springer.

Cuervo

Wyn

(2012). Young people making it work: Continuity and change in rural places. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.

10.

Cuervo

Wyn

(2017). A longitudinal analysis of belonging: Temporal, performative and relational practices by young people in rural Australia. Young, 25(3), 1–16.

11.

Emirbayer

Mische

(1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

12.

Evans

(2016). Moving away or staying local: The role of locality in young people’s ‘spatial horizons’ and career aspirations’. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(4), 501–516.

13.

Farrugia

(2014). Towards a spatialised youth sociology: The rural and the urban in times of change. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 293–307.

14.

Farrugia

(2015). The mobility imperative for rural youth: The structural, symbolic and nonrepresentational dimensions rural youth mobilities. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(6), 836–851.

15.

Farrugia

Smyth

Harrison

(2014). Rural young people in late modernity: Place, globalization and the spatial contours of identity. Current Sociology, 62(7), 1036–1054.

16.

Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland 2012. Retrieved from http://www.tenk.fi/en/responsible-conduct-of-research/accessed

17.

Furlong

Cartmel

(1997). Young people and social change: New perspectives. Berkshire: Open University Press.

18.

Gillies

(2000). Young people and family life: Analysing and comparing disciplinary discourses. Journal of Youth Studies, 3(2), 211–228.

19.

Haukanes

(2013). Belonging, mobility and the future: Representations of space in the life narratives of young rural Czechs. Young, 21(2), 193–210.

20.

Heinz

W. S.

(2009). Youth transitions in an age of uncertainty. In Furlong

(Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 3–13). London: Routledge.

21.

Hitlin

Elder

G. H.

Jr. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191.

22.

Jones

(2009). Youth. Cambridge: Polity Press.

23.

Jørgensen

Knudsen

L. B.

Arp

Skov

(2016). Zones of belonging: Experiences from a Danish study on belonging, local community and mobility. Geoforum Perspektivi, 15(29), 1–28.

24.

Juvonen

(2014). Fragile agencies in the making: Challenges of independent living in emerging adulthood. Young, 22(3), 253–269.

25.

Kiilakoski

(2016). I am fire but my environment is the lighter: A study on locality, mobility, and youth engagement in the Barents Region. Helsinki: Youth Research Network.

26.

Kilpatrick

(2008). Community workshops in the youth training programme. Irish Educational Studies, 4(2), 180–191.

27.

Mallett

(2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89.

28.

Marzi

(2015). Aspirations and social mobility: The role of social and spatial (im)mobilities in the development and achievement of young people’s aspirations. In Laoire

C. N.

White

Skelton

(Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys (pp. 111–130). Heidelberg: Springer.

29.

Massey

(2003). The conceptualization of place. In Massey

Jess

(Eds.), A place in the world (pp. 45–85). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

30.

May

(2011). Self, belonging and social change. Sociology, 45(3), 363–378.

31.

Merino

Garcia

(2006). Emancipation enlargement and the acquisition of autonomy by young people in Catalonia. Young, 14(1), 33–47.

32.

Molgat

Vézina

(2008). Transitionless biographies? Youth and representations of solo living. Young, 16(4), 349–371.

33.

Nairn

Panelli

Mccormack

(2003). Destabilizing dualisms: Young people’s experiences of rural and urban environments. Childhood, 10(1), 9–42.

34.

Niemi

(2012). Lapin nuorisopoliittinen kehittämisohjelma 2015 [The development plan of Lapland’s youth policy]. Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland. Retrieved from http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/86254/Elinvoimaa_alueelle_11_2012.pdf?sequence=1/accessed

35.

Nygren

Blom

(2001). Analysis of short reflective narratives: A method for the study of knowledge in social workers’ actions. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 369–384.

36.

Ollila

(2008). Kerrottu tulevaisuus: Alueet ja nuoret, menestys ja marginaalit [The future told: Regions and youth, success and marginals]. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis No. 141. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.

37.

Ponto

(2017). Young people’s everyday lives in the city: Living and experiencing daily places. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

38.

Regional Council of Lapland. (2017). Lapland’s arctic specialization programme. Retrieved from http://www.lappi.fi/lapinliitto/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=1483089&name=DLFE-21423.pdf

39.

Ricoeur

(1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.

40.

Russell

Simmons

Thompson

(2011). Conceptualising the lives of NEET young people: Structuration theory and disengagement. Education, Knowledge and Economy, 5(3), 89–106.

41.

Sheller

Urry

(2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10–25.

42.

Stauber

Walther

(2002). Misleading trajectories as transition dilemmas of young adults. In Walther/Stauber

Bois-Reymonds

M. d.

Furlong

López Blasco

Moerch

Machado Pais

(Eds.), Misleading trajectories. Integration policies for young adults in Europe? (An EGRIS Publication, pp. 11–18). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

43.

Teater

(2010). Introduction to applying social work theories and methods. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education and Open University Press.

44.

Thomson

Taylor

(2005). Between cosmopolitanism and the locals: Mobility as a resource in the transition to adulthood. Young, 13(4), 327–342.

45.

Tomaney

(2015). Region and place II: Belonging. Progress in Human Geography, 39(4), 507–516.

46.

Tyrrell

Harmer

(2015). A good move? Young people’s comparisons of rural and urban living in Britain. Childhood, 22(4), 551–565.

47.

Urry

(2010). Mobile sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(s1), 347–366.

48.

Vaattovaara

(2015). Elämänkulku ja toimijuus: Lapin maaseudun nuorista aikuisiksi 1990–2011 [Life course and agency: From youth to adulthood in Lapland in 1990–2011]. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.

49.

Wierenga

(2011). Transitions, local culture and human dignity: Rural young men in a changing world. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 371–387.

50.

Williamson

(2007). A complex but increasingly coherent journey? The emergence of ‘youth policy’ in Europe. Youth & Policy, 95, 57–72.