Young adults’ use of individualized explanations for conditions that are structural in origin is well documented. However, recent scholarship has contended that young adults are often more aware of the macro-scale forces that shape their life chances than has previously been acknowledged. We build upon this work by drawing on findings from focus groups conducted with 19 Australian young adults aged 27–28 in which they were called upon to discuss issues and experiences relevant to both their own lives and those of their age cohort more broadly. We find that although the participants co-constructed explanatory narratives that positioned their cohort within a specific socio-historical context, they nevertheless drew chiefly upon individualized explanations and coping strategies to understand these structural changes when the conversation moved to micro-level experiences. We contend that this disjuncture is attributable not to a lack of knowledge or reflexivity but to a perceived lack of social recognition.
AaltonenS. (2016). ‘My Mother thought upper secondary school was ok, but then my siblings said no’: Young people’s perceptions of the involvement of parents and siblings in their future choices. Sociological Research Online, 21(1), 1–12.
2.
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: SAGE Publications.
3.
BlattererH. (2007a). Contemporary adulthood: Reconceptualising an uncontested category. Current Sociology, 55(6), 771–792.
4.
BlattererH. (2007b). Redefinition of a social category. Sociological Research Online, 12(4), 1–11.
5.
BrannenJ.NilsenA. (2005). Individualisation, choice and structure: A discussion of current trends in sociological analysis. Sociological Review, 53(3), 412–428.
6.
ButlerJ. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories of subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
ButlerJ. (2007). An account of oneself. In DaviesB. (Ed.), Judith Butler in conversation: Analyzing the texts and talk of everyday life (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
CampbellI.BurgessJ. (2018). Patchy progress? Two decades of research on precariousness and precarious work in Australia. Labour & Industry, 28(1), 48–67.
9.
CuervoH.WynJ. (2016). An unspoken crisis: The ‘scarring effects’ of the complex nexus between education and work on two generations of young Australians. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 35(2), 122–135.
10.
EvansK. (2002). Taking control of their lives? Agency in young adult transitions in England and the new Germany. Journal of Youth Studies, 5(3), 245–269.
11.
FinchH.LewisJ.TurleyC. (2014). Focus groups. In RitchieJ.LewisJ.McNaughton NichollsC.OrmstonR. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 211–239). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
12.
FranceA.HaddonE. (2014). Exploring the epistemological fallacy: Subjectivity and class in the lives of young people. Young, 22(4), 305–321.
13.
FurlongA.CartmelF. (2006). Young people and social change: Individualisation and risk in late modernity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
14.
GoodwinJ.O’ConnorH. (2009). Through the interviewer’s lens: Representations of 1960s households and families in a lost sociological study. Sociological Research Online, 14(4).
15.
HonnethA. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
IrwinS. (2018). Lay perceptions of inequality and social structure. Sociology, 52(2), 211–227.
17.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–120.
18.
KohliM. (2007). The institutionalization of the life course: Looking back to look ahead. Research in Human Development, 4(3), 253–271.
19.
Laughland-BooÿJ.MayallM.SkrbišZ. (2014). Whose choice? Young people, career choices and reflexivity re-examined. Current Sociology, 63(4), 586–603.
20.
RaynorK.DosenI.OtterC. (2017). Housing affordability in Victoria. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria Library.
21.
RobertsK. (1995). Youth and employment in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
RobertsS. (2010). Misrepresenting ‘choice biographies’? A reply to Woodman. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(1), 137–149.
23.
RosaH. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity (Trejo-MathysJ., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
24.
ThreadgoldS. (2011). Should I pitch my tent in the middle ground? On ‘middling tendency’, Beck and inequality in youth sociology. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(4), 381–393.
25.
VogtK. (2017). From job seekers to self-searchers: Changing contexts and understandings of school-to-work transitions. Young, 26(4), 1–16.
26.
WaltherA. (2015). ‘Me, my education and I’: Constellations of decision-making in young people’s educational trajectories. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(3), 349–371.
27.
WoodmanD. (2010). Class, individualism and tracing processes of inequality in a changing world: A reply to Steven Roberts. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(6), 737–746.
