Today’s young people are engaging in politicized activities and are more attuned to the concerns of their own generation, as opposed to issues more relevant to their parents. Youth political activism takes a less overt and more individualized approach, and young people today are enthusiastic about online participation and engaging in it in different ways.
This article adds to the growing discussion that focuses on connections between social media use and non-institutional youth political participation. The article focuses on the meaning that young people attribute to their own social media participation in two countries—Estonia and Finland—taking into account the impact of the wider social context. The empirical part of the study relies on material collected within the framework of the large-scale European project MYPLACE. The in-depth micro-level analysis is primary based on interviews with young people from Estonia and Finland, contextualized by diverse survey data.
AllasteA.-A.CairnsD. (2017). Understanding online activism in transition society. In FurlongA. (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood (pp. 308–315). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
AminR. (2010). The empire strikes back: Social media uprisings and the future of cyber activism. Kennedy School Review, 10(1), 64–66.
6.
AmnåE. (2013). Active, passive and standby citizens. In KüpperB.ZickA.Mompoint-GaillardP.AmnåE.ByramM.ReinertsenA. B. (Eds.), The EWC statement series (pp. 17–21). Oslo: The European Wergeland Centre.
7.
AmnåE.EkmanJ. (2013). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 1–21.
8.
BakardjievaM. (2009). Subactivism: Lifeworld and politics in the age of the internet. The Information Society, 25(2), 91–104.
9.
BangH. P.SørensenE. (1999). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 325–341.
10.
BeckU. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BennettW. L. (2008). Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12.
BennettW. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39.
13.
BennettW. L.SegerbergA. (2012). The logic of connective action: The personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
14.
BodeL. (2012). Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), 352–369.
15.
CastellsM. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Oxford: Polity Press.
16.
ChristensenH. S. (2012). Simply slacktivism? Internet participation in Finland. JeDem, 4(1), 1–23.
17.
DimitrovaD. V.ShehataA.StrombackJ.NordL. W. (2011). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118.
18.
EkströmM.OlssonT.ShehataA. (2014). Spaces for public orientation? Longitudinal effects of internet use in adolescence. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 168–183.
FentonN.BarassiV. (2011). Alternative media and social networking sites: The politics of individuation and political participation. The Communication Review, 14(3), 179–196.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
HarrisA.WynJ.YounesS. (2010). Beyond apathetic or activist youth: ‘Ordinary’ young people and contemporary forms of participation. Young, 18(1), 9–33.
24.
KalmusV.Kõuts-KlemmR.BeilmannM.RämmerA.OpermannS. (2018). Long-lasting shadows of (post)communism? Generational and ethnic divides in political and civic participation in Estonia. In WallnerC.WimmerJ.WinterR.OelsnerK. (Eds.), (Mis-)Understanding political participation (pp. 35–56). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Ltd.
25.
KeatingA.MelisG. (2017). Social media and youth political engagement: Preaching to the converted or providing a new voice for youth?The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 877–894.
26.
Kõuts-KlemmR.Pruulmann-VengerfeldtP.SiibakA.LauristinM. (2017). Internetikasutus ja sotsiaalmeedia kasutus [The use of the Internet and social media]. In VihalemmP.LauristinM.KalmusV.VihalemmT. (Eds.), Eesti ühiskond kiirenevas ajas: Uuringu Mina. Maailm. Meedia 2002-2014 tulemused [Estonian society in the accelerating time: Results of the survey me. The world. The media 2002–2014] (pp. 279–298). Tartu: Tartu University Press.
27.
LivingstoneS. (2012). Challenges to comparative research in a globalizing media landscape. In EsserF.HanitzschT. (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (ICA Handbook Series, pp. 415–429). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
LoaderB. D.VromenA.XenosM. A. (2014). The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 143–150.
29.
MerikiviJ.MyllyniemiS.SalasuoM. (Eds.). (2016). Media hanskassa: Lasten ja nuorten vapaa-aikatutkimus 2016 mediasta ja liikunnasta. [A grip on media—A study of children’s and young people’s leisure activities in 2016, with an emphasis on media and physical activities]. Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusseura/ Nuorisotutkimuverkosto.
30.
MichelettiM. (2003). Political virtue and Shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
MorozovE. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
ÖstmanJ. (2013). When private talk becomes public political expression: Examining a practice- field hypothesis of youth political development. Political Communication, 30(3), 601–619.
35.
PilkingtonH.PollockG. (2015). ‘Politics are bollocks’: Youth, politics and activism in contemporary Europe. The Sociological Review, 63(S2): 1–35.
36.
QuintelierE.VissersS. (2008). The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411–427.
37.
RunnelP.Pruulmann-VengerfeldtP.ReinsaluK. (2009). The Estonian tiger leap from post-communism to the information society: From policy to practice. Journal of Baltic Studies, 40(1), 29−51.
SiisiäinenM. (1990). The spirit of the 60’s and the formation of voluntary associations in Finland. In MarinM.PekonenK.SiisiäinenM. (Eds.), Aging, generations, and politics (pp. 56–97). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
41.
SiisiäinenM. (1998). Uusien ja vanhojen liikkeiden keinovalikoimat [The range of methods of new and old movements]. In IlmonenK.SiisiäinenM. (Eds.), Uudet ja vanhat liikkeet [New and old movements] (pp. 219–243). Tampere: Vastapaino.
42.
SinananJ.HoseinG.-J. (2017). Non-activism: Political engagement and Facebook through ethnography in Trinidad. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–10.
43.
SveningssonM. (2015). ‘I wouldn’t have what it takes’: Young Swedes understandings of political participation. Young, 24(2), 139–156.
44.
TheocharisY.QuintelierE. (2016). Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society, 18(5), 817–836.
45.
ThorsonK. (2014). Facing an uncertain reception: Young citizens and political interaction on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 203–216.
46.
TiidenbergK.AllasteA.-A. (2016). Perceptions of participation and the share button. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 8(2), 52–63.
47.
VukelicJ.StanojevicD. (2012). Environmental activism as a new form of political participation of the youth in Serbia. Sociologija, 54(2), 387–399.
48.
WolfsfeldG.YarchiM.Samuel-AzranT. (2016). Political information repertoires and political participation. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2096–2115.
