‘She was Like “Don’t Try This” and “Don’t Drink This” and “Don’t Mix These”’: Older Siblings and the Transmission of Embodied Knowledge Surrounding Alcohol Consumption
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2020
‘She was Like “Don’t Try This” and “Don’t Drink This” and “Don’t Mix These”’: Older Siblings and the Transmission of Embodied Knowledge Surrounding Alcohol Consumption
This article draws on qualitative research conducted with 40 young people, aged 15–24, in the Chorlton and Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK. With a focus on alcohol consumption, this article shows how older siblings transmit embodied knowledge to younger siblings. This article finds that older siblings are an important source of protection for younger siblings when starting their drinking careers. Moreover, they play a fundamental role in facilitating open intragenerational dialogue surrounding alcohol consumption. Through highlighting the important role of older siblings in transmitting embodied knowledge to younger siblings during the transition to adulthood, this article argues that there is a need to encourage greater involvement of siblings in formal educational settings surrounding learning about important issues, such as: alcohol consumption; drug consumption; and relationships and sex education, to help ensure consistent messages.
AaltonenS. (2016). ‘My mother thought upper secondary school was ok, but then my sibling said no’—young people’s perceptions of the involvement of parents and siblings in their Future Choices. Finnish Youth Research Society, 21, 1–12.
2.
AthertonJ.BakerC.GrahamE. (2005). A ‘genius of place’? Manchester as a case study in public theology. In GrahamE.RowlandsA. (Eds.), Pathways to the public square: Proceedings of the 2003 IAPT conference, Manchester (pp. 63–83). London: Transaction.
3.
BaconK. (2012). ‘Beings in their own right’? Exploring children and young people’s sibling and twin relationships in the minority world. Children’s Geographies, 10, 307–319.
EdwardsR.HadfieldL.LuceyH.MauthnerM. (2006). Sibling identity and relationships: Sisters and brothers. London: Routledge.
11.
EdwardsR.MauthnerM.HadfieldL. (2005). Children’s sibling relationships and gendered practices: Talk, activity and dealing with change. Gender and Education, 17, 499–513.
EvansB. (2008). Geographies of youth/young people. Geography Compass, 2, 1659–1680.
14.
GilliesV.LuceyH. (2006). ‘It’s a connection you can’t get away from’: Brothers, sisters and social capital. Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 479–493.
15.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
16.
GuanS. A.FuligniA. J. (2015). Changes in parent, sibling, and peer support during the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 1–14.
17.
GuilleminM.GillamL. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 261–280.
18.
HadfieldL.EdwardsR.MauthnerM. (2006). Brothers and sisters: A source of support for children in school. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 34, 65–72.
19.
HelsethS.SletteboA. (2004). Research involving children: Some ethical issues. Nursing Ethics, 11, 298–308.
20.
HoldsworthC. (2007). Leaving home in Britain and Spain. European Sociological Review, 16, 201–222.
21.
HopkinsP.OlsonE.PainR.VincettG. (2011). Mapping intergenerationalities: The formation of youthful religiosities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 314–327.
22.
JayneM.ValentineG. (2015). ‘It makes you go crazy’: Children’s knowledge and experience of alcohol consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 1–20.
23.
JonesO. (2008). True geography [ ] quickly forgotten, giving away to an adult-imagined universe. Approaching the otherness of childhood. Children’s Geographies, 6, 195–212.
24.
JosephJ.DonnellyM. K. (2012). Reflections on ethnography, ethics and inebriation. Leisure36(3–4), 357–372.
25.
KaarM. (2007). A critical investigation of the merits and drawbacks of in-depth interviews. Grin: Verlag.
26.
KatainenA.RolandoS. (2015). Adolescents’ understandings of binge drinking in southern and northern European contexts: Cultural variations of ‘controlled loss of control’. Journal of Youth Studies, 18, 151–166.
27.
KilpatrickR.McCartanC.McAlisterS.McKeownP. (2007). ‘If I’m brutally honest, research has never appealed to me …’ the problems and successes of a peer research project. Educational Action Research, 15, 251–369.
28.
KothariB. H.SorensonP.BankL.SnyderJ. (2014). Alcohol and substance use in adolescence and young adulthood: The role of siblings. Journal of Family Social Work, 17, 324–343.
29.
KusenbachM. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4, 455–485.
30.
LangevangT. (2007). Movements in time and space: Using multiple methods in research with young people in Accra, Ghana. Children’s Geographies, 5, 267–282.
31.
LatourB. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimensions of science studies. Body and Society, 10, 205–229.
32.
LucasK.TylerS.ChristodoulouG. (2009). Assessing the ‘value’ of new transport initiatives in deprived neighbourhoods in the UK. Transport Policy, 16, 115–122. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.004
33.
Manchester City Council. (2012). Chorlton ward profile. Manchester: Author.
MauthnerM. (2000). Snippets and silences: Ethics and reflexivity in narratives of sistering. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 287–306.
36.
MauthnerM. (2005). Distant lives, still voices: Sistering in family sociology. Sociology, 39, 623–642.
37.
McCartanC.SchubotzD.MurphyJ. (2012). The self-conscious researcher: Post-modern perspectives of participatory research with young people. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). Retrieved from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1798
OswinN.OlundE. (2010). Guest editorial: Governing intimacy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 60–67.
44.
PlowmanL.StevensonO. (2012). Using mobile phone diaries to explore children’s everyday lives. Childhood, 19, 539–553.
45.
PunchS. (2001). Household division of labour: Generation, gender, age, birth order and sibling composition. Work, Employment & Society15(4), 803–823.
46.
PunchS. (2002). Youth transitions and interdependent adult-child relations in rural Bolivia. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 123–133.
47.
PunchS. (2005). The generationing of power: A comparison of child-parent and sibling relations in Scotland. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 10, 169–188.
48.
PunchS. (2008). ‘You can do nasty things to your brothers and sisters without a reason’: Siblings’ backstage behaviour. Children and Society, 22, 333–344.
49.
RenoldE. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities: Exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
50.
Ripoll-NúñezK.CarrilloS. (2014). Sibling relationships and children’s social wellbeing. In Ben-AriehA.CasasF.FronesI.KorbinJ. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being: Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (pp. 1817–1842). Netherlands: Springer.
51.
SchäferN.YarwoodR. (2008). Involving young people as researchers: Uncovering multiple power relations among youths. Children’s Geographies, 6, 121–135.
52.
SchnallS.HaidtJ.CloreG. L.JordanA. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.
53.
SmallR. (2001). Codes are not enough: What philosophy can contribute to the ethics of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 387–406.
54.
SongM. (2010). Does ‘race’ matter? A study of ‘mixed race’ siblings’ identifications. The Sociological Review, 58, 265–285.
TibbettsG.ScharfeE. (2015). Oh, brother (or sister)!: An examination of sibling attachment, conflict, and cooperation in emerging adulthood. Journal of Relationships Research, 6, 1–11.
57.
TolonenT. (2008). Success, coping and social exclusion in transitions of young Finns. Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 233–249.
58.
ValentineG. (1999). Being seen and heard? The Ethical complexities of working with children and young people at home and at school. Philosophy and Geography, 2, 141–155.
59.
ValentineG. (2003). Boundary crossings: Transitions from childhood to adulthood. Children’s Geographies, 1, 37–52.
60.
ValentineG. (2013). Using interviews as a research methodology. In FlowerdewR.MartinD. (Eds.), Methods in human geography: A guide for students doing a research project (2nd ed., pp. 110–127). New York, NY: Routledge.
61.
ValentineG.HollowayS. L.JayneM. (2010). Generational patterns of alcohol consumption: Continuity and change. Health and Place, 16, 916–925.
62.
ValentineG.HughesK. (2011). Shared space, distant lives? Understanding family and intimacy at home through the lens of internet gambling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 242–255.
63.
ValentineG.JayneM.GouldM. (2012). Do as I say, not as I do: The affective space of family life and the generational transmission of drinking cultures. Environment and Planning A, 44, 776–792.
64.
ValentineG. (2014). The proximity effect: The role of the affective space of family life in shaping children’s knowledge about alcohol and its social and health implications. Childhood, 21, 103–118.
65.
WaittG.JessopL.Gorman-MurrayA. (2011). ‘The guys in there just expect to be laid’: The embodied and gendered socio-spatial practices of a ‘night out’ in Wollongong Australia. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 18, 255–275.
66.
WhitemanS. D.McHaleS. M.SoliA. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on sibling relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 3, 124–139.
67.
WilkinsonS. (2016). Hold the phone! Culturally credible research ‘with’ young people. Children’s Geographies14(2), 232–238.
68.
WilkinsonS. (2017). Young women’s careful and careless drinking geographies. In HortonJ.PyerM. (Eds.), Children, young people and care (pp. 192–203). Oxon: Routledge.
69.
WilkinsonS.WilkinsonC. (2018). Researching drinking ‘with’ young people: A palette of methods. Drugs and Alcohol Today18(1), 6–16.
