This research considers the waiting and confinement experienced by young asylum seekers during and after their stay at a temporary shelter in Finland. The data for this research consists of interviews and ethnographic ‘hanging out’ with nine young asylum seekers throughout their asylum process. In order to generate new knowledge about the situated and fluid experiences of young adult asylum seekers’ confinement, this article focuses on four in-depth interviews with two young men, Kokab and Mahammed. They arrived in Finland in 2015, and are, at the time of writing this article, still waiting for their final asylum decisions. The results show, first, that while the time in the temporary shelter resembles physical, punitive confinement, it is also experienced as warm and social time. Second, the article argues that the confinement of young asylum seekers extends beyond the physical confinement, as they are for years confined in forced movement, indefinite waiting and othered as a number in the system.
AbourahmeN. (2014). Assembling and spilling-over: Towards an ‘ethnography of cement’ in a Palestinian refugee camp. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 200–217.
2.
AllsoppJ.ChaseE.MitchellM. (2015). The tactics of time and status: Young people’s experiences of building futures while subject to immigration control in Britain. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(2), 163–182.
3.
AgambenG. (1998). Homo sacer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
BaileyA. J.WrightR. A.MountzA.MiyaresI. M. (2002). (Re)producing Salvadoran transnational geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 125–144.
5.
BengtssonT. T. (2012). Boredom and action: Experiences from youth confinement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(5), 526–553.
6.
BrunC. (2015). Active waiting and changing hopes: Toward a time perspective on protracted displacement. Social Analysis, 59(1), 19–37.
7.
CampesiG. (2015). Humanitarian confinement: An ethnography of reception centres for asylum seekers at Europe’s southern border. Migration and Border Studies, 1(4), 398–418.
8.
ChaseE. (2013). Security and subjective wellbeing: The experiences of unaccompanied young people seeking asylum in the UK. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(6), 858–872.
9.
ColeD. R. (2013). Lost in data space: Using nomadic analysis to perform social science. In ColemanR.RingroseJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 219–237). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10.
De LissovoyN. (2012). Conceptualizing the carceral turn: Neoliberalism, racism and violation. Critical Sociology, 39(2), 739–55.
11.
DuncombeJ.JessopJ. (2002). ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In MautherM. (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107–122). London: SAGE Publications.
12.
EnellS. (2017). ‘I got to know myself better, my failings and faults’: Young people’s understandings of being assessed in secure accommodation. YOUNG, 25(2), 124–140.
FontanariE. (2015). Confined to the threshold: The experiences of asylum seekers in Germany. City, 19(5), 715–726.
16.
GhorashiH.BoerM.HolderF. (2017). Unexpected agency on the threshold: Asylum seekers narrating from an asylum seeker centre. Current Sociology, 66(3), 373–391.
17.
GreenB. (2019). Drowning in neoliberal lies: State responses towards people seeking asylum. British Journal of Social Work, (2019), 1–18. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcz070.
18.
HeylB. S. (2007). Ethnographic interviewing. In AtkinsonP. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.
19.
HonkasaloV.MaicheK.OnoderaH.PeltolaM.SuurpääL. (2017). Young people at reception centres. Helsinki: Finnish Youth Research Society, Finnish Youth Research Network.
20.
HonkatukiaP. (2018). Haastattelu nuorisotutkimuksen metodina [Interview as a method in youth research]. In KiilakoskiT.HonkatukiaP. (Eds.), Miten tutkia nuoria ja nuorisotyötä? [How to research youth and youth work?] (pp. 149–170). Tampere: Vastapaino.
21.
HyndmanJ.GilesW. (2011). Waiting for what? The feminization of asylum in protracted situations. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 18(3), 361–379.
22.
IkävalkoE. (2016). Vaikenemisia ja vastavirtaa. Valtasuhteet ja toiminnan mahdollisuudet oppilaitosten tasa-arvosuunnittelussa [Silences and resistance. Power relations and opportunities for agency in the educational institutions’ gender equality planning] (Doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
23.
JeffersonA.SegalL. (2019). The confines of time: On the ebbing away of futures in Sierra Leone and Palestine. Ethnos, 84(1), 96–112.
24.
JeffersonA.TurnerS.JensenS. (2019). Introduction: On stuckness and sites of confinement. Ethnos, 84(1), 1–13.
25.
KaukkoM.ParkkilaH. (2014). Nykyajan totaaliset laitokset tyttöjen suojelijoina [The total institutions of today. Girls in foster care]. In GisslerKekkonenKänkäinenMuranenWrede-Jäntti (Eds.), Nuoruus toisin sanoen [Youth in other words] (pp. 113–121). Helsinki: Youth Research Network and National Institute for Health and Welfare.
26.
KaukkoM.Korkiamäki.R.KuusistoA. K. (2019). Normatiivisesta etiikasta elettyyn kohtaamiseen: Tutkimuksellista hengailua yksin tulleiden maahanmuuttajanuorten kanssa [From normative ethics to lived encounters: Hanging out and doing research with unaccompanied asylum seeking youth]. In VehkalahtiKaisaRutanenNiina (Eds.), Lasten ja nuorten tutkimuksen etiikka II [The ethics of child and youth research]. Helsinki: Youth Research Network.
27.
KohliR. K. S. (2014). Protecting asylum seeking children on the move. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 30(1), 83–104.
28.
KohliR.KaukkoM. (2018). The management of time and waiting of unaccompanied asylum seeking girls in Finland. Journal of Refugee Studies, 31(4), 488–506.
LanasM.RautioP. (2014). Reciprocity as relational. Two examples of conducting research in Finnish Lapland. In WhiteS.CorbettM. (Eds.), Doing educational research in rural settings. Methodological issues, international perspectives and practical solutions. London: Routledge.
31.
LemsA.OesterK.StrasserS. (Eds.). (2019). Children of the crisis: Ethnographic perspectives on unaccompanied refugee youth in and en route to Europe [Special issue]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584697.
32.
MalkkiL. (1995). Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 495–523.
33.
MalkkiL. (1997). National geographic: The rooting of people and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. In GuptaA.FergusonJ. (Eds.), Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology (pp. 52–74). Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.
34.
MacLureM. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In ColemanR.RingroseJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
35.
MartinL.MitchelsonM. (2009). Geographies of detention and imprisonment: Interrogating spatial practices of confinement, discipline, law, and state power. Geography Compass, 3(1), 459–477.
36.
MountzA. (2011). Where asylum seekers wait: Feminist counter-topographies of sites between states. Gender, Place and Culture, 18(3), 381–399.
37.
MountzA.CoddingtonK.CataniaR. T.LoydJ. M. (2013). Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 522–541.
38.
MurphyE.DingwallR. (2007). The ethics of ethnography. In AtkinsonP. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.
39.
NykänenT.KoikkalainenS.SeppäläTMikkonenE.RainioM. (2019). Poikkeusajan tilat: Vastaanottokeskukset pohjoisessa Suomessa [Spaces in times of exception: Reception centres in Northern Finland]. In LyytinenE. (Eds.), Turvapaikanhaku ja pakolaisuus Suomessa [Asylum seeking and refugees in Finland] (pp. 161–184). Turku: Siirtolaisinstituutti (Migration Institute of Finland).
40.
O’ReillyZ. (2018). ‘Living liminality’: Everyday experiences of asylum seekers in the ‘Direct Provision’ system in Ireland. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(6), 821–842.
PetäjäniemiM.LanasM.KaukkoM. (2018). Osallisuus turvaa hakevan reunaehdoissa: Hätämajoitusyksikössä asuvien nuorten turvapaikanhakijamiesten kertomuksia arjesta. [Participation as part of the boundary conditions of an asylum seeker: Stories of participation, inclusion and exclusion of young male asylum seekers living in a temporary shelter]. Aikuiskasvatus, 38(1), 4–17.
44.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 12–28.
45.
PyyryN. (2015). Hanging out with young people, urban spaces and ideas: Openings to dwelling, participation and thinking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
46.
RotterR. (2016). Waiting in the asylum determination process: Just an empty interlude?Time & Society, 25(1), 80–101.
47.
SchweizerH. (2008). On waiting (thinking in action). London: Routledge.
48.
SharmaS. (2008). Baring life and lifestyle in the non-place. Cultural Studies, 23(1), 129–148.
49.
SigonaN. (2015). Campzenship: Reimagining the camp as a social and political space. Citizenship Studies, 19(1), 1–15.
50.
StaceyJ. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women’s Studies International Forum, 12, 579–592.
51.
TaniS. (2014). The right to be seen, the right to be shown: Ethical issues regarding the geographies of hanging out. YOUNG, 22(4), 361–379.
52.
ThorshaugR. Ø. (2019). Arrival in-between: Analyzing the lived experiences of different forms of accommodation for asylum seekers in Norway. In MeeusB.ArnautK.van HeurB. (Eds.), Arrival infrastructures. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
TurnerV. (1964). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in Rites de Passage. Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society. Symposium on the new approaches to the study of religion, 4–20.
VerdascoA. (2018). Communities of belonging in the temporariness of the Danish Asylum System: Shalini’s anchoring points. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(9), 1–19.
56.
VerdascoA. (2019). Everyday rituals of migration: Constructing relatedness and agency among young refugees in Denmark. Ethnos. doi:10.1080/00141844.2019.1604558
57.
VitusK. (2010). Waiting time: The de-subjectification of children in Danish asylum centres. Childhood, 17(1), 26–42.
58.
VälimäkiM. (2019). Kylmän sodan ajasta eurooppalaiseen päätöksentekoon: Kansainvälistä suojelua hakevia ihmisiä koskeva politiikka ja lainsäädäntö 1973–2015 [From the time of Cold War to European decision making: The politics and law regarding people seeking international protection]. In LyytinenE. (Ed.), Turvapaikanhaku ja pakolaisuus Suomessa [Asylum seeking and refugees in Finland] (pp. 161–184). Turku: Siirtolaisinstituutti (Migration Institute of Finland).
59.
Yle. (2018). Turvapaikkahakemukset käsiteltävä kohta puolessa vuodessa [Asylum applications need to soon be processed in six months]. Retrieved from https://yle.fi/uutiset/3–10204654
