Inaccuracy of Diagnosis in a Cohort of Patients on the Waiting List for Dacryocystorhinostomy When the Diagnosis Was Made by Only Syringing the Lacrimal System

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate identification of the factors contributing to epiphora is essential in directing appropriate management and treatment strategies. The authors applied a methodical strategy of assessment for epiphora to patients who were already on the waiting list for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The findings were compared to the original findings.

Methods

Forty-four eyes of 35 patients listed for DCR were re-examined. All canaliculi were examined using four tests: dye disappearance, Jones 1 (dye retrieval), probing using Bowman probes, and syringing of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) under local anesthesia. Some patients were examined using an endocanalicular mini-endoscope. Patients with NLD obstruction underwent DCR and those with canalicular and NLD stenosis underwent intubation of the lacrimal system-canaliculus, lacrimal sac, and nasolacrimal duct-using silicone stents. The authors refer to this as canaliculodacryocystoplasty (CDCP). The patients were assessed for symptoms of epiphora at 12 months. Forty-four eyes had been listed for DCR. They had been originally diagnosed, by means of lacrimal syringing, as NLD obstruction (24 eyes) or stenosis (12 eyes), and functional blocks (8 eyes).

Results

Four out of the original 44 planned DCR surgeries were performed after re-evaluation. After re-examination, 28 lacrimal systems were found to have canalicular stenosis, 4 NLD stenosis, 4 NLD obstruction, 4 punctal phimosis, 3 ocular surface disease, and 1 patient was asymptomatic. Twenty-eight lacrimal systems underwent CDCP, 4 underwent DCR, 4 had punctoplasty, and 4 had probing alone. Three had treatment for ocular surface disease and one patient required no treatment. After a follow-up of 12 months, 41 (93%) systems had improvement or were free of their epiphora.

Conclusions

Syringing of the lacrimal apparatus may result in a high false positive diagnosis of NLD obstruction. Canalicular pathology is not uncommon in this cohort of patients and may be underdiagnosed.

Keywords

Canaliculodacryocystoplasty Dacryocystorhinostomy Epiphora Nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Guzek

J.P.

, Ching

A.S.

, Hoang

T.A.

Clinical and radiologic lacrimal testing in patients with epiphora. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1875–81.

Fulcher

, O'Connor

, Moriarty

Nasolacrimal intubation in adults. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 1039–41.

Psilas

, Eftaxias

, Kastanioudakis

, Kalogeropoulos

Silicone intubation as an alternative to dacryocystorhinostomy for naso-lacrimal drainage obstruction in adults. Eur J Ophthalmol 1993; 3: 71–6.

Pashby

R.C.

, Rathbun

J.E.

Silicone tube intubation of the lacrimal drainage system. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 1318–22.

Mullner

, Bordner

, Mannor

G.E.

Endoscopy of the lacrimal system. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 949–52.

Beigi

, O'Keefe

Results of Crawford tube intubation in children. Acta Ophthalmol 1993; 71: 405.

Mullner

Ritleng intubation set: a new system for lacrimal pathway intubation. Ophthalmologica 2000; 214: 237–9.