The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and to investigate results of a modified two-incision total hip replacement using either intraoperative fluoroscopy or imageless navigation. Twenty-nine patients (30 hips) with a minimum follow-up of one year were enrolled in this study. The patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1-year. The functional recovery as represented by the Harris hip score and WOMAC scale were better in the fluoroscopy group of patients at the early postoperative stage (3 wks). Thereafter, both groups showed rapid recovery with no difference in scores. Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was the most commonly seen complication and it occurred in 6 hips (fluoroscopy 2; imageless 4). The symptoms were transient and resolved in 6 months in all 6 cases. This study demonstrated that the role of intraoperative fluoroscopy could safely be replaced by an imageless navigation system for the MIS-2 THA.
BergerR.A.Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach.Clin Orthop Relat Res2003; 417: 232–41.
2.
BergerR.A., JacobsJ.J., MeneghiniR.M., ValleC.D., PaproskyW., RosenbergA.G.Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 429: 239–47.
3.
BerryD.J., BergerR.A., CallaghanJ.J.. American orthopaedic association symposium: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: development, early results, and a critical analysis.J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85: 2235–46.
4.
FehringT.K., MasonJ.B.Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases.J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87: 711–4.
5.
FeinblattJ.S., BerendK.R., LombardiA.V.Jr.. Severe symptomatic heterotopic ossification and dislocation: a complication after two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2005; 20: 802–6.
6.
BalB.S., HaltomD., AletoT., BarrettM.Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87: 2432–8.
7.
DiGioiaA.M.III, JaramazB., BlackwellM.. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment.Clin Orthop Relat Res1998; 355: 8–22.
8.
DiGioiaAMIII, JaramazB., PlakseychukA.Y.. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket.J Arthroplasty2002; 17: 359–64.
9.
JollesB.M., GenoudP., HoffmeyerP.Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 426: 174–9.
10.
AmiotL., PoulinF.Computer tomography-based navigation for hip, knee and spine surgery.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 421: 77–86.
11.
WixsonR.L., MacDonaldM.A.Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation.J Arthroplasty2005; 20(suppl 3): S51–6.
12.
NoglerM., KesslerO., PrasslA.. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imagelss navigation system.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 426: 159–63.
13.
HarrisW.H.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.J Bone Joint Surg Am1969; 51: 737–55.
14.
BellamyN., BuchananW.W., GoldsmithC.H., CampbellJ., StittL.W.Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.J Rheumatol1998; 15: 1833–40.
15.
PradhanR.Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs.J Bone Joint Surg Br1999; 81: 431–5.
16.
ChanY.S., ShihC.H.Bipolar versus total hip arthroplasty for hip osteonecrosis in the same patient.Clin Orthop Relat Res2000; 379: 169–77.
17.
WrightJ.M., CrockettH.C., DelgadoS., LymanS., MadsenM., SculcoT.P.Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation.J Arthroplasty2004; 19: 538–45.
18.
GoldsteinW.M., BransonJ.J., BerlandK.A., GordonA.C.Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85: 33–8.
19.
SiguierT., SiguierM., BrumptB.Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate. A study of 1037 total hip replacements.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 426: 164–73.
20.
FrndakP.A., MalloryT.H., LombardiA.V.Jr.. Translateral surgical approach to the hip: The abductor muscle “split”.Clin Orthop Relat Res1993; 295: 135–41.
21.
HardingeK.The direct lateral approach to the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Br1982; 64: 17–9.
22.
BertinK.C., RöttingerH.Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery. A modified Watson-Jones approach.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 429: 248–55.
23.
ArchibeckM.J., WhiteR.E.Jr.. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 429: 232–8.
24.
KennonR.E., KeggiJ.M., WetmoreR.S., ZatorskiL.E., HuoM.H., KeggiK.J.Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach.J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85: 39–48.
25.
WidmerK.H., ZurfluhB.Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.J Orthop Res2004; 22: 815–21.
26.
BiedermannR., ToninA., KrismerM., RachbauerF., Eibl, StöcklB.Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. The effect of orientation of the acetabular component.J Bone Joint Surg Br2005; 87: 762–9.
27.
AsayamaI., ChamnongkichS., SimpsonK.J., KinseyT.L., MahoneyO.M.Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2005; 20: 414–20.
28.
DelpS.L., MaloneyW.Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles.J Biomech1993; 26: 485–99.
