Retrograde Genocephalic Removal of Fractured or Immovable Femoral Stems in Revision Hip Surgery

Abstract

Revision arthroplasty for femoral stem breakage can be challenging. We report a new method for the removal of the distal stem segment performed in 6 cases between 2004 and 2008. After extracting the proximal part of the femoral component, the femoral canal was opened at the knee joint and a modified intramedullary nail was used to dislodge the distal stem under fluoroscopic control. In five cases the surgery was uneventful. In one case femoral perforation occurred due to the contour of the cement mantle at the tip of the stem. In the postoperative period all patients progessed well. Removal of a broken stem using our method has limited indications, and it is not recommended in septic cases or when the cement mantle at the tip of the stem has an oblique contour. It also requires opening of the knee joint, but the technique is simple, saves surgical time and in selected cases it does not weaken the femur.

Keywords

Broken femoral implant Hip prosthesis Joint Revision

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lee

, Goodman

S.B.

. Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5: 383–93.

Kurtz

, Ong

, Lau

, Mowat

, Halpern

. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 780–5.

Bradnock

. Cement removal from the femoral cavity, 55-440-C-10. In: Duparc

, ed. Surgical tehniques in orthopedics and traumatology. Pelvic ring and hip. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2003.

Wagner

, Wagner

. Hip prosthesis revision with the non-cemented femoral revision stem -10 years' experience. Orthopäde 1987; 16: 295–300.

Miner

T.M.

, Momberger

N.G.

, Chong

, Paprosky

W.L.

. The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(Suppl 1): 188–94.