Natural history of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Aim:

The aim of this study was to examine the natural history of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropraxia in a previously reported cohort of individuals after direct anterior approach (DAA).

Methods:

99 patients (107 hips) with LFCN neuropraxia were identified, out of which 82 patients (87 hips) (83.1%) completed functional outcomes questionnaires at mean follow-up of 5.5 years (4.4–6.9 years). 5 patients were excluded from the study due to intra-articular source of pain and/or revision surgery. The total sample was composed of 77 patients (31 total hip replacements and 51 hip resurfacings) and functional outcomes scores were obtained for all patients.

Results:

At average 5.46-year follow-up, 55 patients (60 hips 73%) still reported symptoms of LFCN neuropraxia but their Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were not inferior to those who had resolution for pain, function and stiffness: p values of 0.716, 0.171, and 0.238, respectively. The mean score on visual analogue scale decreased from 2.32 (SD 2.11) to 1.76 (SD 1.99). 1 patient (1.2%) reported his activities were limited by his symptoms.

Conclusion:

Although the majority of patients still report symptoms related to LFCN neuropraxia, symptoms do improve over time and there are no functional limitations. Even if LFCN neuropraxia following DAA does not lead to functional limitations, all patients should be made aware in order to alleviate any long-term functional concerns.

Keywords

direct anterior approach hip resurfacing (HR)LFCN neuropraxia total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lindgren

Wretenberg

Karrholm

et al . Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42,233 patients. Bone Joint J 2014; 96: 590–596.

Amlie

Havelin

Furnes

et al . Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 463–469.

Berry

von Knoch

Schleck

et al . The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 9–14.

Judet

The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1950; 32: 166–173.

Taunton

Mason

Odum

et al . Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(9 Suppl.): 169–172.

Zawadsky

Paulus

Murray

et al . Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1256–1260.

Alexandrov

Ahlmann

Menendez

LR.

Early clinical and radiographic results of minimally invasive anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2014; 2014: 954208.

Agudelo

Dayton

et al . Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2013; 36: e276–281.

Bhandari

Matta

Dodgin

et al . Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40: 329–342.

10.

Goulding

Beaulé

Kim

et al . Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 2397–2404.

11.

Bhargava

Goytia

Jones

et al . Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve impairment after direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2010; 33: 472.

12.

van Oldenrijk

Hoogland

Tuijthof

et al . Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THA. Acta orthopaedica 2010; 81: 696–702.

13.

Smith

Blake

Hing

CB.

Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 173–184.

14.

Benezis

Boutaud

Leclerc

et al . Lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy and its surgical treatment: a report of 167 cases. Muscle Nerve 2007; 36: 659–663.

15.

Coert

Dellon

AL.

Documenting neuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve using the Pressure-Specified Sensory Testing device. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 373–377.

16.

Eto

Hwang

Huddleston

et al . The direct anterior approach is associated with early revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1001–1005.

17.

McConnell

Kolopack

Davis

AM.

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 453–461.

18.

Bellamy

Buchanan

Goldsmith

et al . Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840.

19.

Nilsdotter

Lohmander

Klässbo

et al . Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.

20.

Paulsen

Roos

Pedersen

et al . Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 39–48.

21.

Ilchmann

Gersbach

Zwicky

et al . Standard transgluteal versus minimal invasive anterior approach in hip arthroplasty: a prospective, consecutive cohort study. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2013; 5: e31.

22.

Zawadsky

Paulus

Murray

23.

Sibia

Turner

MacDonald

et al . The impact of surgical technique on patient reported outcome measures and early complications after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1171–1175.

24.

Jelsma

Pijnenburg

Boons

et al . Limited benefits of the direct anterior approach in primary hip arthroplasty: A prospective single centre cohort study. J Orthop 2017; 14: 53–58.

25.

Lin

Bendich

et al . A comparison of radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty between the posterior approach and direct anterior approach with intraoperative fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 616–623.

26.

Parvizi

Restrepo

Maltenfort

MG.

Total hip arthroplasty performed through direct anterior approach provides superior early outcome: results of a randomized, prospective study. Orthop Clin North Am 2016; 47: 497–504.

27.

Porter

ME.

What is value in health care?

N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2477–2481.

28.

Grossman

Ducey

Nadler

et al . Meralgia paresthetica: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 336–344.

29.

Ahlmann

Patzakis

Roidis

et al . Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 716–720.

30.

Kurz

Garfin

Booth

Jr.

Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine 1989; 14: 1324–1331.

31.

Younger

Chapman

MW.

Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 1989; 3: 192–195.

32.

Uzel

Akkin

Tanyeli

et al . Relationships of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve to bony landmarks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 2605–2611.

33.

Rudin

Manestar

Ullrich

et al . The anatomical course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with special attention to the anterior approach to the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98: 561–567.

34.

Lee

Dellon

AL.

Surgical management of groin pain of neural origin. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 137–142.

35.

Reid

Cros

Proximal sensory neuropathies of the leg. Neurol Clin 1999; 17: 655–667, viii.

36.

Schnatz

Wax

Steinfeld

et al . Meralgia paresthetica: an unusual complication of post-cesarean analgesia. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11: 416–418.

37.

Seng

Berend

Ajluni

et al . Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40: 343–350.

38.

Restrepo

Parvizi

Pour

et al . Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 671–679.e1.

39.

Lovell

TP.

Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(7 Suppl.): 64–68.

40.

Woolson

Pouliot

Huddleston

JI.

Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short-term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 999–1005.

41.

Chen

Garland

Roffey

et al . Can surgeons adequately capture adverse events using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity system (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 253–260.

42.

Hunter

Louis

Ricciardi

et al . The saphenous nerve: its course and importance in medial arthrotomy. Am J Sports Med 1979; 7: 227–230.

43.

Bhave

Mont

Tennis

et al . Functional problems and treatment solutions after total hip and knee joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(Suppl. 2): 9–21.

44.

Kjaergaard

Fauno

Sensibility loss after ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 507–511.

45.

Luo

et al . Relationship between different skin incisions and the injury of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007; 120: 1127–1130.

46.

Sanders

Rolf

McClelland

et al . Prevalence of saphenous nerve injury after autogenous hamstring harvest: an anatomic and clinical study of sartorial branch injury. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 956–963.

47.

Flowers

RS.

Meralgia paresthetica. A clue to retroperitoneal malignant tumor. Am J Surg 1968; 116: 89–92.

48.

Nahabedian

Dellon

AL.

Meralgia paresthetica: etiology, diagnosis, and outcome of surgical decompression. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35: 590–594.

49.

Yang

Chen

PQ.

Postoperative meralgia paresthetica after posterior spine surgery: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: E547–550.

50.

Toros

Karabay

Ozaksar

et al . Evaluation of peripheral nerves of the upper limb with ultrasonography: a comparison of ultrasonographic examination and the intra-operative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 762–765.