The posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) often requires dissection of the short external rotators (SERs), which could increase the postoperative dislocation rate. The reattachment of the dissected SERs has been reported to reduce the dislocation rate, while such repair generally causes progression of muscle atrophy. 1 of the suggested causes of atrophy is reduced blood flow to the repaired SERs. The present study aimed to measure the blood flow of the SERs before dissection (pre-tenotomy) and after reattachment (post-reattachment) during the posterior approach in THA.
Methods:
This prospective study included 26 patients who underwent THA via the posterior approach. A laser-Doppler rheometer was used to measure the blood flow in the following SERs at the time of pre-tenotomy and post-reattachment: the piriformis muscle (PM), superior gemellus (SG), inferior gemellus (IG), obturator internus (OI), and subcutaneous tissue as a control.
Results:
The average pre-tenotomy and post-reattachment blood flows (mL/minutes/100 g) were: 1.90 ± 0.28 and 1.92 ± 0.40 in the PM, 1.94 ± 0.20 and 1.99 ± 0.39 in the SG, 1.91 ± 0.21 and 1.94 ± 0.30 in the IG, 1.93 ± 0.22 and 1.98 ± 0.36 in the OI, and 1.94 ± 0.24 and 1.87 ± 0.38 in the subcutaneous tissue. The pre-tenotomy and post-reattachment blood flows did not show significant difference in any muscle.
Conclusions:
Laser-Doppler blood flow measurements showed that the blood flow is preserved, even when the SERs are dissected and reattached in THA via the posterior approach.
RobinsonRPRobinsonHJJrSalvatiEA.Comparison of the transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res1980; (147): 143–147.
2.
HigginsBTBarlowDRHeagertyNE, et alAnterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty2015; 30: 419–434.
3.
ZawadskyMWPaulusMCMurrayPJ, et al. Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty2014; 29: 1256–1260.
4.
HuntLPBen-ShlomoYClarkEM, et al. 90-day mortality after 409,096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the national joint registry for England and Wales: a retrospective analysis. Lancet2013; 382: 1097–1104.
5.
ChandlerRWDorrLDPerryJ.The functional cost of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res1982; (168): 168–172.
6.
McCollumDEGrayWJ.Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res1990; (261): 159–170.
7.
PellicciPMSalvatiEARobinsonHJ.Mechanical failures in total hip replacement requiring reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am1979; 61: 28–36.
8.
MoussallemCDHoyekFALahoudJC.Incidence of piriformis tendon preservation on the dislocation rate of total hip replacement following the posterior approach: a series of 226 cases. J Med Liban2012; 60: 19–23.
9.
KwonMSKuskowskiMMulhallKJ, et al. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates?Clin Orthop Relat Res2006; 447: 34–38.
10.
RitterMAHartyLDKeatingME, et al. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res2001; (385): 95–99.
11.
VicarAJColemanCR.A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res1984; (188): 152–159.
12.
IrioRSpechtLMHealyWL, et al. The effect of EPSTR and minimal incision surgery on dislocation after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res2006; 447: 39–42.
13.
McLawhornASPotterHGCrossMB, et al. Posterior soft tissue repair after primary THA is durable at mid-term followup: a prospective MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res2015, 473: 3183–3189.
14.
KhanRJLamLOBreidahlW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of preserved vs divided and repaired piriformis during total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty2012; 27: 551–558.
HobermanHD.Endocrine regulation of amino acid protein metabolism during fasting. Yale J Biol Med1950; 22: 341–367.
17.
BraunTPMarksDL.The regulation of muscle mass by endogenous glucocorticoids. Front Physiol2015; 6: 12.
18.
ShacharSSWilliamsGRMussHB, et al. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer2016; 57: 58–67.
19.
PaulsonOBEngelAGGomezMR.Muscle blood flow in Duchenne type muscular dystrophy, limb-girdle dystrophy, polymyositis, and in normal controls. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1974; 37: 685–690.
20.
SmitsGJRomanRJLombardJH.Evaluation of laser-Doppler flowmetry as a measure of tissue blood flow. J Appl Physiol1986; 61: 666–672.
21.
HidaSNaitoMKuboM.Intraoperative measurements of nerve root blood flow during discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2003; 28: 85–90.
22.
KiyamaTNaitoMShiramizuK, et al. Ischemia of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve during periacetabular osteotomy using Smith-Petersen approach. J Orthop Trauma2009; 10: 123–126.
23.
KiyamaTNaitoMShitamaH, et al. Comparison of skin blood flow between mini- and standard-incision approaches during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty2008; 23: 1045–1049.
24.
ShitamaHNaitoMShinodaT, et al. Effect of the lateral approach on blood flow of the gluteus medius and abductor function in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics2008; 31: 549.
25.
DastaneMDorrLDTarwalaR, et al. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res2011; 469: 429–436.
26.
KjellbergMAl-AmiryBEnglundE, et al. Measurement of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: the reliability of a plain radiographic method compared to CT-scanogram. Skeletal Radiol2012; 41: 187–191.
27.
MeermansGMalikAWittJ, et al. Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res2011; 469: 1677–1682.
28.
StandringS.Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41st ed. New York: Elsevier Limited, 2016, pp.1358–1361.
29.
ZlotorowiczMSzczodryMCzubakJ, et al. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery with respect to the vascularity of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br2011; 93: 1471–1474.
30.
GautierEGanzKKrügelN, et al. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br2000; 82: 679–683.
31.
GroseAWGardnerMJSussmannPS, et al. The surgical anatomy of the blood supply to the femoral head: description of the anastomosis between the medial femoral circumflex and inferior gluteal arteries at the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br2008; 90: 1298–1303.
32.
DrakeRVoglWMitchellAWM. Gray’s anatomy for students. 3rd ed.Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2015, pp. 568.
33.
LeeYCCallarySAHowieDW, et al. The effect of hip position on the length of trochanteric muscles: potential implications for early postoperative management of hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty2012; 27: 953–960.
34.
RanawatCSMeftahMPotterHG, et al. The posterior approach in THR: assuring capsular stability. Orthopedics2011; 34: e452–e455.
35.
NakaoMSegalSS.Muscle length alters geometry of arterioles and venules in hamster retractor. Am J Physiol1995; 268(Pt 2): 336–344.
36.
PooleDCMuschTIKindigCA.In vivo microvascular structural and functional consequences of muscle length changes. Am J Physiol1997; 272(Pt 2): 2107–2114.
37.
KruseNTSiletteCRScheuermannBW.Influence of passive stretch on muscle blood flow, oxygenation and central cardiovascular responses in healthy young males. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2016; 310: H1210–H1221.
