Does femoral morphology and stem alignment influence outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty with proximally coated double-tapered titanium stems?

Abstract

Introduction:

Stem subsidence and thigh pain can cause significant patient dissatisfaction after cementless THA. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of proximal-femoral morphology and stem alignment on clinical outcomes using a double-tapered, cementless titanium femoral component.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 281 consecutive, primary THAs from 2012 to 2014 with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Preoperative radiographs were used to assess femoral neck shaft angle (FNS), canal flare index (CFI), Dorr classification, and greater trochanter (GT) overhang. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine stem alignment and 6-week follow-up radiographs were used to determine subsidence. Clinical outcomes included thigh pain, leg-length discrepancy (LLD), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and revision surgeries.

Results:

271 stems (96%) did not subside (<4 mm) and 10 (4%) showed evidence of subsidence (>4 mm). Subsidence was significantly associated with subsequent revision surgery (p < 0.01). 278 stems (99%) were in neutral alignment and 3 in varus (1%). Alignment did not significantly influence subsidence, thigh pain, LLD, revisions, or PROMs. Femoral morphology measures (FNS, CFI, Dorr classification, and GT overhang) were not significantly associated with stem alignment, subsidence, LLD, or revisions. CFI was significantly associated with intraoperative calcar fractures (p = 0.02). GT overhang was associated with thigh pain (p = 0.03) and FNS was inversely associated with postoperative HOOS scores.

Conclusions:

Subsidence and proximal-femoral morphology are potential sources of postoperative morbidity in certain cementless THA patients. In accordance with prior studies, CFI was identified as a potential risk factor for intraoperative calcar fractures. More research into preoperative femoral morphologies, such as GT overhang and FNS, is warranted as these may contribute to unsatisfactory results related to cementless THA.

Keywords

Stem alignment subsidence total hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Froimson

Garino

Machenaud

, et al. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 1–7.

Lachiewicz

Soileau

Bryant

. Second-generation proximally coated titanium femoral component: minimum 7-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 465: 117–121.

Mueller

Nowak

Haeberle

, et al. Progressive femoral cortical and cancellous bone density loss after uncemented tapered-design stem fixation. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 171–177.

Schramm

Keck

Hohmann

, et al. Total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented femoral component with taper design: outcome at 10-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 407–412.

Vresilovic

Hozack

Rothman

. Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 304–311.

Kim

. The results of a proximally-coated cementless femoral component in total hip replacement: a five- to 12-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 299–305.

Mouttet

Philippot

Farizon

, et al. Five-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite coated stem. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008; 94: 746–752.

McLaughlin

Lee

. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1290–1296.

Purtill

Rothman

Hozack

, et al. Total hip arthroplasty using two different cementless tapered stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 121–127.z

10.

Gromov

Bersang

Nielsen

, et al. Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 451–457.

11.

Engh

Bobyn

Glassman

. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69: 45–55.

12.

Vresilovic

Hozack

Rothman

. Radiographic assessment of cementless femoral components. Correlation with intraoperative mechanical stability. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 137–141.

13.

Min

Song

Bae

, et al. The effect of stem alignment on results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless tapered-wedge femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 418–423.

14.

Pajarinen

Lindahl

Savolainen

, et al. Femoral shaft medialisation and neck-shaft angle in unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Int Orthop 2004; 28: 347–353.

15.

Yeung

Chiu

Yau

, et al. Assessment of the proximal femoral morphology using plain radiograph-can it predict the bone quality? J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 508–513.

16.

Dorr

Faugere

Mackel

, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 1993; 14: 231–242.

17.

Khalily

Lester

. Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 463–466.

18.

Cinotti

Della Rocca

Sessa

, et al. Thigh pain, subsidence and survival using a short cementless femoral stem with pure metaphyseal fixation at minimum 9-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99: 30–36.

19.

Berend

Mallory

Lombardi

Jr , et al. Tapered cementless femoral stem: difficult to place in varus but performs well in those rare cases. Orthopedics 2007; 30: 295–297.

20.

Mallory

Lombardi

Leith

, et al. Why a taper? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84(Suppl. 2): 81–89.

21.

Ries

Lynch

Jenkins

, et al. Varus migration of PCA stems. Orthopedics 1996; 19: 581–585.

22.

Casper

Kim

Parvizi

, et al. Morphology of the proximal femur differs widely with age and sex: relevance to design and selection of femoral prostheses. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 1162–1166.

23.

Ishii

Homma

Baba

, et al. Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of Asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, tapered-wedge stem? J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 1524–1528.

24.

Miettinen

Mäkinen

Kostensalo

, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative calcar fracture in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 113–119.

25.

Newell

. The calcar femorale: a tale of historical neglect. Clin Anat 1997; 10: 27–33.

26.

Lamontagne

Adamczyk

, et al. Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1289–1296.

27.

Mantovani

Lamontagne

, et al. Increased hip stresses resulting from a cam deformity and decreased femoral neck-shaft angle during level walking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 998–1008.

28.

Lewis

Sahrmann

Moran

. Effect of hip angle on anterior hip joint force during gait. Gait Posture 2010; 32: 603–607.

29.

Wesseling

de Groote

Meyer

, et al. Gait alterations to effectively reduce hip contact forces. J Orthop Res 2015; 33: 1094–1102.

30.

De Martino

De Santis

D’Apolito

, et al. The synergy cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 29–36.

31.

Dalury

Kelley

Adams

. Modern proximally tapered uncemented stems can be safely used in Dorr type C femoral bone. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 1014–1018.