Short-term outcomes of thin highly cross-linked polyethylene liners in primary total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Introduction:

The use of thin highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA) allows utilisation of larger femoral heads. However, concern surrounding postoperative complications remains. This study aims to investigate rates of revision and re-admission associated with thin HXLPE liners at short-term follow-up.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 3047 patients who underwent THA with a cementless modular acetabular implant with a 36-mm femoral head, and different thicknesses of HXPLE liners from 2011 to 2021. We identified 723 patients (23.7%) with a minimum 2-year follow-up and 206 patients (6.8%) with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients in the thin group (TG, n = 1020) received <5.1-mm liners with 52-mm size cups while patients in the non-thin group (NTG, n = 2027) received >5.1-mm liners with >52-mm size cups. Outcomes were compared using multi-variable logistic regressions while controlling for all significant demographic differences.

Results:

We found no significant differences in re-admission (3.9% vs. 4.3%, OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.63–1.49; p = 0.874) and revision (2.5% vs. 3.2%, OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41–1.26; p = 0.246) rates between groups. The difference in fracture rate between groups was not significant, but the 1 recorded acetabular fracture (5%) occurred in the NTG. Although the rate of liner exchange was lower in the TG (1.1%) compared to the NTG (2.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24–1.05; p = 0.068). Liners were exchanged for liner wear in 1 hip (1%), aseptic reasons in 38 hips (66%), and peri-prosthetic joint infection in 19 hips (33%).

Conclusions:

Patients undergoing THA with a thin liner were not significantly predisposed to higher rates of revision surgery or poorer clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up when compared to those who received a thicker liner. Consequently, further long-term studies regarding the utility of thin HXLPE implants in reducing complications should be pursued.

Keywords

HXLPE modular implant outcomes revision total hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Harris

. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 66–70.

McKellop

Shen

, et al. Effect of sterilization method and other modifications on the wear resistance of acetabular cups made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. A hip-simulator study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 1708–1725.

Hopper

Jr Young

Orishimo

, et al. Effect of terminal sterilization with gas plasma or gamma radiation on wear of polyethylene liners. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 464–468.

Gomez-Barrena

Puertolas

Munuera

, et al. Update on UHMWPE research: from the bench to the bedside. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 832–840.

Langlois

Hamadouche

. Recent update on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. SICOT J 2020; 6: 13.

Bozic

Kurtz

Lau

, et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 128–133.

Howie

Holubowycz

Middleton

, et al. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 1095–1102.

Garbuz

Masri

Duncan

, et al. The Frank Stinchfield award: dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 351–356.

Cooper

Della Valle

. Large diameter femoral heads: is bigger always better? Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(Suppl. A): 23–26.

10.

Pijls

Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag

Nelissen

. Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 1175–1180.

11.

No authors listed. The dangers of big femoral heads on thin polyethylene: the missing part of the equation. Exatech Technical Profiles. 2012. https://www.exac.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/711-12-81-Rev-A_Big_Head_Thin_PolyTech_Mono.pdf

12.

Sayeed

Mont

Costa

, et al. Early outcomes of sequentially cross-linked thin polyethylene liners with large diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2011; 69(Suppl. 1): S90–S94.

13.

Schwartz

Farley

Guild

, et al. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35(Suppl.): S79–S85.

14.

Yee

O’Keefe

Winter

. Incarcerated fracture fragments of Longevity polyethylene liners after total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2016; 2: 6–10.

15.

Waewsawangwong

Goodman

. Unexpected failure of highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 323.e1–323.e4.

16.

Ast

John

Labbisiere

, et al. Fractures of a single design of highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners: an analysis of voluntary reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1231–1235.

17.

Jauregui

Naziri

Pierce

, et al. Is the use of thin, highly cross-linked polyethylene liners safe in total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 2016; 40: 681–686.

18.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175–191.

19.

Dumbleton

D’Antonio

Manley

, et al. The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 265–271.

20.

Bookman

Kaye

Chen

, et al. 10-year follow-up wear analysis of marathon highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 2587–2589.

21.

Zou

Novikov

Feng

, et al. Liner dissociation leading to catastrophic failure of an Oxinium femoral head. Arthroplast Today 2018; 5: 21–25.

22.

Barrett

Prasad

Boyce

, et al. Total hip arthroplasty outcomes in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3: 507–512.